Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)
Conditions
Brief summary
Efficacy - PFS in FCA vs FC alone, defined as the time from randomization to disease progression, or relapse per the Lugano classification criteria (Cheson et al, 2014) as assessed by IRC or death
Detailed description
Efficacy - ORR in FCA vs FC alone, defined as assessment of CR or PR, assessed using the Lugano classification criteria 2014; Cheson , et al, 2014) by IRC at any time up through commencement of new anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent., Efficacy - EFS in FCA vs FC alone, defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or relapse per the Lugano classification criteria 2014 as assessed by IRC and per investigator assessment, new anticancer therapy, or death, Efficacy - DOR, defined as time from the first observed response to disease progression or relapse (per IRC and per investigator assessment) or death, Efficacy - ORR in FCA vs FC alone per investigator assessment at any time up through commencement of new anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent, Efficacy - Best overall response (CR, PR, SD, PD) (per IRC and per investigator assessment) at any time up through commencement of new anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent, Efficacy - PFS in FCA vs FC alone, defined as time from the randomization to progression or relapse per investigator assessment per the Lugano classification criteria as assessed by investigator, or death, Efficacy - TTR, defined as the time from randomization to the first observed response (per IRC and per investigator assessment), Efficacy - OS in FCA vs FC alone, defined as the time from randomization to death, Efficacy - Depth and duration of lymphodepletion, as assessed by lymphocyte count, PK concentrations will be used in a population PK model, ALLO-501A expansion and persistence, eg, Cmax and AUC., Pharmacodynamics will be evaluated on host T cell counts, The incidence of ADA against ALLO-501A scFv and/or TALEN®, The incidence of ADA against ALLO-647, Safety - AEs as characterized by preferred term, frequency, severity, timing, seriousness, and relationship to ALLO-647, and by FCA vs FC, Safety - The incidence of infusion-related reactions, cytopenias, and infections, Safety - AEs as characterized by preferred term, frequency, severity timing, seriousness, and relationship to ALLO-501A and by FCA vs FC, Safety - The incidence and severity of CRS, neurotoxicity, infections, hematologic toxicities, prolonged cytopenias, and GVHD, Safety - The incidence and severity of clinically significant laboratory toxicities.
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Efficacy - PFS in FCA vs FC alone, defined as the time from randomization to disease progression, or relapse per the Lugano classification criteria (Cheson et al, 2014) as assessed by IRC or death | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Efficacy - ORR in FCA vs FC alone, defined as assessment of CR or PR, assessed using the Lugano classification criteria 2014; Cheson , et al, 2014) by IRC at any time up through commencement of new anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent., Efficacy - EFS in FCA vs FC alone, defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or relapse per the Lugano classification criteria 2014 as assessed by IRC and per investigator assessment, new anticancer therapy, or death, Efficacy - DOR, defined as time from the first observed response to disease progression or relapse (per IRC and per investigator assessment) or death, Efficacy - ORR in FCA vs FC alone per investigator assessment at any time up through commencement of new anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent, Efficacy - Best overall response (CR, PR, SD, PD) (per IRC and per investigator assessment) at any time up through commencement of new anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent, Efficacy - PFS in FCA vs FC alone, | — |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, Germany