Skip to content

Utilization of a Microdevice for Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis

Utilization of a Cutaneous Therapy In Situ Microdevice

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07352566
Enrollment
10
Registered
2026-01-20
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2030-06-01
Last updated
2026-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This study is being done to test a microdevice, which is a small device designed to test drugs directly on skin conditions like atopic dermatitis (eczema) and psoriasis. The small device, about the size of a grain of rice, has up to 20 tiny reservoirs that hold medications that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Very small amounts of these medications will be released into the skin (at levels in your body much lower than are typically used). In this study, the device will be tested to see if it's safe and works well for predicting how the skin will react to standard treatments. We will also look at how these reactions are connected to genetic information and overall treatment results.

Interventions

DEVICEIn situ cutaneous microdevice

The small device, about the size of a grain of rice, has up to 20 tiny reservoirs that hold medications that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. In this study, the device will be tested to see if it's safe and works well for predicting how the skin will react to standard treatments. The microdevice will contain a subset of the following: Triamcinolone, 5-fluorouracil, Calcipotriene, Tapinarof, Crisaborole, Tacrolimus, Adalimumab, Etanercept, Certolizumab, Infliximab, Secukinumab, Ixekizumab, Apremilast, Risankizumab, Ustekinumab, Hydroxychloroquine, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate, Azathioprine, Chloroquine, Cyclosporine, Tofacitinib, Deucravacitinib, Dupilumab, Tralokinumab, Guselkumab, Tildrakizumab, Baractinib, Abrocitinib, Upadacitinib, Lebrikizumab, Nemolizumab, Ruxolitinib, Bimekizumab, Roflumilast.

DRUGTriamcinolone

Triamcinolone

DRUG5-Fluorouracil

5-fluorouracil

Calcipotriene

Tapinarof

Crisaborole

DRUGTacrolimus

Tacrolimus

DRUGAdalimumab

Adalimumab

DRUGEtanercept

Etanercept

Certolizumab

DRUGInfliximab

Infliximab

DRUGSecukinumab

Secukinumab

DRUGIxekizumab

Ixekizumab

DRUGApremilast

Apremilast

DRUGRisankizumab

Risankizumab

DRUGUstekinumab

Ustekinumab

DRUGHydroxychloroquine

Hydroxychloroquine

DRUGMethotrexate

Methotrexate

Mycophenolate

DRUGAzathioprine

Azathioprine

DRUGChloroquine

Chloroquine

DRUGCyclosporine

Cyclosporine

DRUGTofacitinib

Tofacitinib

DRUGDeucravacitinib

Deucravacitinib

DRUGDupilumab

Dupilumab

DRUGTralokinumab

Tralokinumab

DRUGGuselkumab

Guselkumab

DRUGTildrakizumab

Tildrakizumab

DRUGBaractinib

Baractinib

DRUGAbrocitinib

Abrocitinib

DRUGUpadacitinib

Upadacitinib

DRUGLebrikizumab

Lebrikizumab

DRUGNemolizumab

Nemolizumab

DRUGRuxolitinib

Ruxolitinib

DRUGBimekizumab

Bimekizumab

DRUGRoflumilast

Roflumilast

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\> 18 years of age patients with atopic dermatitis or psoriasis if female patient with child bearing potential (on oral contraceptive pills or intrauterine device for at least 30 days)

Exclusion criteria

None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with adverse events1 yearThe safety of microdevice placement and removal will be based on assessment of adverse events.
Proportion of retrieved devices with assessable tissue1 yearThe feasibility of microdevice analysis based on the ability to place and retrieve the device with sufficient tissue, of sufficient quality, for downstream histopathology/molecular analysis and interpretation of at least 80% of the device reservoirs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in local skin inflammation (molecular assays)1 yearFeasibility of utilizing quantitative histopathologic assessment and/or transcriptional profiling to determine whether there is local change in lesional rash-affected skin with clinically relevant skin inflammation treating agents.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTRaymond Cho, MD, PhD
raymond.cho@ucsf.edu415-353-7800
CONTACTJeffrey Cheng, MD, PhD
jeffrey.cheng@ucsf.edu415-575-0524
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRaymond Cho, MD, PhD

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026