Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion (MACS)
Conditions
Keywords
cortisol, Cushing, MACS, METYRAPONE, osilodrostat
Brief summary
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of the two 11β-hydroxylase inhibitors-metyrapone and osilodrostat-in patients with MACS. Primary outcome To compare the efficacy (biochemical and clinical) of the two 11β-hydroxylase inhibitors (CYP11B1), metyrapone and osilodrostat, in patients with MACS not treated surgically (mainly bilateral adenomas or adrenal hyperplasias), as well as their side effects at time 0-, 3- and 6-months post-treatment. Secondary outcome To evaluate alterations in clinical parameters (Blood Pressure, Body Mass Index-BMI), metabolic parameters (fasting blood glucose, insulin, Hb1Ac, HOMA, OGTT and lipids levels) at time 0-, 3- and 6-month after the initiation of the treatment and their effect on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) 1 year post-diagnosis
Interventions
Follow-up
administration of 1-3 mg of osilodrostat at 19.00
Surgery performed in patients with MACS
metyrapone( 250 -750 mg) vs. osilodrostat (1-3 mg) vs. surgery vs watch and wait strategy in the management of patients with MACS
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults \> 18 years old with MACS and unilateral or bilateral adrenal adenomas or hyperplasia (based on imaging) * 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ODST): Cortisol levels at 8.00 am\>1.8 μg/dl AND i) ACTH\< 15 pg/ml OR ii) abnormal midnight salivary cortisol OR iii) Urinary free cortisol levels (UFC) /24h ≥ of the UNL
Exclusion criteria
* Abnormal liver enzymes * eGFR \< 40 ml/min/1.73 m3 * Pseudocushing syndrome * Patients with any malignancy (active or past history), including ACC * ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome (Cushing disease or ectopic Cushing syndrome)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the efficacy of metyrapone and osilodrostat | Baseline ( at t=0), at t=3 months and at =6 months | Blood tests measuring baseline moring cortisol (μg/dl) levels pre and post-treatment |
| Comparison of the efficacy of metyrapone and osilodristat | Baseline (at t= 0), at t= 3 months and t= 6 months | Measurement of the baseline morning ACTH (pg/ml) pre and post-treatment |
| Comparison of metyrapone and osilodrostat efficacy | Baseline (at t=0), at t=3 months , at t =6 months | Measurement of salivary midnight cortisol (μg/dl) pre and post-treatment |
| Comparison of metyrapone and osilodrostat in terms of alterations of metabolic parameters | Baseline (t=0), at t= 3months, at t=6 months | Alteartions of LDL levels (mg/dl) pre and post-treatment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of metyrapone and osilodrostat in terms of alterations of metabolic parameters | Baseline at t=0 , at 3 months and at 6 months | Alterations of fasting blood glucose levels (mg/dl) pre and post-treatment |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of metyrapone and osilodrostat in terms of other parameters | Baseline (t=0), at t=3 months and t=6 months | Alterations of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) at morning pre and post-treatment |
Countries
Greece