Skip to content

Trifecta-Kidney cfDNA-MMDx Study

Trifecta-Kidney cfDNA-MMDx Study: Comparing the DD-cfDNA Test to MMDx Microarray Test, Central HLA Antibody Test, and Histology.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04239703
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-01-27
Start date
2019-12-01
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplant Rejection

Keywords

donor derived cell-free DNA, blood, kidney biopsy

Brief summary

Demonstrate the relationship between DD-cfDNA levels and HLA antibodies in blood, and the Molecular Microscope® (MMDx) Diagnostic System results in indication biopsies.

Detailed description

There is a need for better screening of kidney transplant patients for rejection. Patients with kidney transplants are routinely tested (creatinine, urine protein, histology and donor specific antibody (DSA) as standard of care to detect rejection, but these tests are not adequate. Rejection is often missed by these tests (false negatives) and other processes such as acute kidney injury can produce false-positive results. Moreover, histology has a high interobserver disagreement diagnosing rejection, and cannot accurately assess acute injury. A definitive molecular assessment of rejection and injury in kidney biopsies has emerged - the Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx) - developed by the Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, University of Alberta. Now a new screening test is being introduced: the monitoring of donor-derived cell-free DNA (DD-cfDNA) released in the blood by the kidney during rejection. The Natera Inc DD-cfDNA Prospera® test is based on the massively multiplex PCR that targets 13,392 single nucleotide polymorphisms and targeted sequences are quantified by Next Generation Sequencing. The Prospera® test done on kidney transplant recipients detected "active rejection" and differentiated it from borderline rejection and no rejection. It is likely, however, that DD-cfDNA test may miss some T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases and the distinction between early and fully developed antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) was not tested. No study has actually examined the DD-cfDNA results in kidney transplants with acute or chronic kidney disease (AKI and CKD). DD-cfDNA measurements have only been correlated with histology, a flawed standard. DD-cf-DNA test must now be calibrated against MMDx that is based on global gene expression, the new standard for biopsy interpretation. The present study will calibrate centrally measured (Natera Inc) DD-cfDNA levels obtained at the time of an indication biopsy against the MMDx measurements of TCMR, and ABMR (early-stage, fully-developed, and late-stage), AK, and atrophy-fibrosis. We will compare blood DD-cfDNA measurements in 600 samples at the time of 300 indication biopsies to the MMDx results, as well as central assessment of HLA antibody (One Lambda) in 300 blood samples, interpreted centrally as DSA based on the tissue typing results. This study is an extension of the INTERCOMEX ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01299168. Investigators have collected 1195 kidney biopsies, 1103 blood samples for DD-cfDNA test and 1150 blood samples for One Lamba test, and will extend this study to the total of 1400 biopsies and 2800 blood samples.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMMDx

Portion of kidney transplant indication biopsy

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTProspera

Transplant patient blood sample

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHLA antibody

Transplant patient blood sample

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER
Natera, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
One Lambda
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All kidney transplant recipients undergoing a kidney biopsy for clinical indications, as determined by their physician or surgeon, will be eligible to enroll in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients will be excluded from the study if they decline participation or are unable to give informed consent or multiple organ recipients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Calibration of Prospera test for T cell-mediated rejection18 monthsCalibration of DD-cfDNA test cut-off values against the probability of T cell-mediated rejection in the biopsy as reported by MMDx.
Calibration of Prospera test for antibody-mediated rejection18 monthsCalibration of DD-cfDNA test cut-off values against the probability of antibody-mediated rejection in the biopsy as reported by MMDx.
Calibration of Prospera test for kidney injury18 monthsCalibration of DD-cfDNA test cut-off values against the probability of acute and chronic kidney injury in the biopsy as reported by MMDx.
Report calibrated Prospera test results for rejection6 monthsReport new DD-cfDNA test cut-off values for rejection
Report calibrated Prospera test results for kidney injury6 monthReport new DD-cfDNA test cut-off values for acute and chronic kidney injury

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determine if Prospera blood test can replace kidney biopsy test6 monthsDetermine if Prospera test, as calibrated by this DD-cfDNA-HLA-MMDx study, will avoid need for indication biopsy when kidney transplant function deteriorates. This will be based on the consensus between participating clinicians.
Assessment of donor-specific antibody status6 monthsReport and compare the DSA status based on centralized and local HLA antibody measurement.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Switzerland, United States

Contacts

CONTACTKonrad S Famulski, PhD
konrad@ualberta.ca1 780 492 1725
CONTACTRobert Polakowski, PhD
polakows@ualberta.ca1 780 492 5091
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPhilip F Halloran, MD, PhD

University of Alberta

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026