Skip to content

An 8-Week Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

An 8-Week Open-Label, Sequential, Repeated Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Children and Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Followed by an Extension Phase

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02890992
Acronym
ODYSSEY KIDS
Enrollment
42
Registered
2016-09-07
Start date
2016-09-15
Completion date
2019-02-22
Last updated
2019-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolaemia

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the effect of alirocumab on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels after 8 weeks of treatment in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) participants aged of 8 to 17 years, with LDL-C \>=130 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (3.37 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\]) on optimal stable daily dose of statin therapy +/- other lipid modifying therapies (LMTs) or a stable dose of non-statin LMTs in case of intolerance to statins for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening period. Secondary Objective: * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab. * To evaluate the pharmacokinetics profile of alirocumab. * To evaluate the effects of alirocumab on other lipid parameters.

Detailed description

For Cohorts 1 to 3, a study duration of approximately 16-23 weeks (screening period: up to 6 (+1) weeks, open-label dose finding treatment period: 8 weeks, follow up period: 6-8 weeks). For Cohort 4, a study duration of approximately 14-19 weeks (screening period up to 6 \[+1\] weeks, open-label dose finding treatment period: 12 weeks). Optional extension period: up to a maximum of 2 years for the first participants enrolled in Cohorts 1 to 3, but a maximum of approximately 5 months for the first participants enrolled in Cohort 4. For all participants who declined participation in the phase 3 study, their last alirocumab injection was on December 2018.

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: solution Route of administration: subcutaneous injection

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

DRUGezetimibe

Pharmaceutical form:tablet Route of administration: oral

Pharmaceutical form:tablet Route of administration: oral

DRUGfenofibrate

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

DRUGomega-3 fatty acids

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Children and adolescent male and female participants aged of 8 to 17 years at the time of signed informed consent. For Russia only: Male and female participants aged \>=12 and \<=17 years at the time of signed informed consent. * Participants with diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) through genotyping or clinical criteria. * Participants treated with optimal dose of statin +/- other LMT(s) or non-statin LMT(s) if statin intolerant at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening lipid sampling. * Participants with calculated LDL-C greater than or equal to 130 mg/dL (\>=3.37 mmol/L) at the screening visit. * Participants with body weight greater than or equal to 25 kg. * Participants aged of 8 to 9 years to be at Tanner stage 1 and participants aged of 10 to 17 years to be at least at Tanner stage 2 in their development. * A signed informed consent indicating parental permission with or without participant assent.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant with secondary hyperlipidemia. * Diagnosis of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. * Participant who had received lipid apheresis treatment within 2 months prior to the screening period, or has plans to receive it during the study. * Known history of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. * Known history of thyroid disease. * Known history of hypertension. * Fasting triglycerides \>350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L). * Severe renal impairment (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2). * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>2 x upper limit of normal (ULN). * Creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) \>3 x ULN. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Percent change in calculated LDL-C was defined as 100\*(calculated LDL-C value at Week 8 - calculated LDL-C value at baseline)/calculated LDL-C value at baseline. All available baseline and post-baseline calculated LDL-C value during the OLDFI efficacy treatment period & within one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model. OLDFI efficacy treatment period was defined as the period from first investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection to last OLDFI IMP injection + 21 days(for Cohorts 1 & 2) or +35 days (for Cohorts 3 & 4). Adjusted Least-squares (LS) mean & standard error (SE) at Week 8 were obtained from mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen (30 mg Q2W \[\<50 kg\], 40 mg Q2W \[\<50 kg\], 50 mg Q2W \[\>=50 kg\], 75 mg Q2W \[\>=50 kg\], 75 mg Q4W \[\<50 kg\],150 mg Q4W \[\>=50 kg\], 150 mg Q4W \[\<50 kg\] and 300 mg Q4W (\[\>=50 kg\] dose), time point & dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 8At Week 8Combined estimate for percentage of participants was obtained by averaging out all the imputed percentage of participants reaching the level of interest. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000. In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 8At Week 8Combined estimate for percentage of participants was obtained by averaging out all the imputed percentage of participants reaching the level of interest. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000. In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12: Cohort 4Baseline, Week 12Adjusted LS means and standard error at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline value and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows used in the model.
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baselines value and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population in the two steps respectively (with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population (in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.
Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Absolute change in LDL-C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 8 value. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population (in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.
Absolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population (in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Countries

Canada, Czechia, France, Netherlands, Norway, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 16 sites in 10 countries. Overall 63 participants were screened between 15 September 2016 and 13 June 2018, of whom 21 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to exclusion criteria met.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 42 participants were included in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 30 mg administered Q2W up to 8 weeks added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 30 mg administered Q2W from Week 16 until switch to Cohort 2 dosage including dose adjustment to body weight as required, then Cohort 2 dosage: if body weight was still \< 50 kg, participants received SC injection of alirocumab 40 mg administered Q2W until Week 130; if body weight was \> = 50 kg participants received SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q2W until Week 130.
4
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 50 mg administered Q2W up to 8 weeks added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 50 mg administered Q2W from Week 16 until switch to Cohort 2 dosage then SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q2W until Week 130.
6
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 40 mg administered Q2W up to 8 weeks added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 40 mg administered Q2W from Week 16 until switch of dosage in Cohorts 1 and 3. If body weight was still \< 50 kg, participants continued to receive SC injection of alirocumab 40 mg administered Q2W until Week 130; if body weight was \> = 50 kg participants received SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q2W until Week 130.
4
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q2W up to 8 weeks added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q2W from Week 16 until Week 130.
6
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) up to 8 weeks added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q4W from Week 14 until switch to Cohort 2 dosage including dose adjustment to body weight as required, then Cohort 2 dosage: if body weight was still \< 50 kg, participants received SC injection of alirocumab 40 mg administered Q2W until Week 130; if body weight was \> = 50 kg participants received SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q2W until Week 130.
6
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 150 mg administered Q4W up to Week 8 added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 150 mg administered Q4W from Week 14 until switch to Cohort 2 dosage then SC injection of alirocumab 75 mg administered Q2W until Week 130.
5
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 150 mg administered Q4W up to 12 weeks added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \< 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 150 mg administered Q4W from Week 12 until Week 48.
6
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kg
Period 1: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 300 mg administered Q4W up to 12 weeks added to LMT. Period 2: Participants with body weight \>= 50 kg received SC injection of alirocumab 300 mg administered Q4W from Week 12 until Week 48.
5
Total42

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
130 Weeks Open-Label Extension PeriodAdverse Event01000000
130 Weeks Open-Label Extension PeriodIncluded but not treated00000011
130 Weeks Open-Label Extension PeriodOther than specified02000000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgCohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgCohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgCohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgCohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgCohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgCohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgCohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgTotal
Age, Continuous11.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
13.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
14.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
9.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
13.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
13.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
12.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)5.169 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.736
4.339 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
3.596 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
4.510 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.052
4.337 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.147
4.642 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.272
5.100 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.136
4.641 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.926
4.6 millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American/White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
4 Participants6 Participants4 Participants6 Participants5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 60 / 40 / 60 / 60 / 50 / 60 / 50 / 100 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 45 / 61 / 44 / 65 / 63 / 53 / 64 / 57 / 109 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 60 / 40 / 60 / 60 / 50 / 60 / 50 / 100 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8

Percent change in calculated LDL-C was defined as 100\*(calculated LDL-C value at Week 8 - calculated LDL-C value at baseline)/calculated LDL-C value at baseline. All available baseline and post-baseline calculated LDL-C value during the OLDFI efficacy treatment period & within one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model. OLDFI efficacy treatment period was defined as the period from first investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection to last OLDFI IMP injection + 21 days(for Cohorts 1 & 2) or +35 days (for Cohorts 3 & 4). Adjusted Least-squares (LS) mean & standard error (SE) at Week 8 were obtained from mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen (30 mg Q2W \[\<50 kg\], 40 mg Q2W \[\<50 kg\], 50 mg Q2W \[\>=50 kg\], 75 mg Q2W \[\>=50 kg\], 75 mg Q4W \[\<50 kg\],150 mg Q4W \[\>=50 kg\], 150 mg Q4W \[\<50 kg\] and 300 mg Q4W (\[\>=50 kg\] dose), time point & dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population which included all participants who received at least one dose or partial dose of IMP injection and had an evaluable outcome measure during the open-label dose finding efficacy treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-41.1 percent changeStandard Error 12.6
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-7.9 percent changeStandard Error 10.3
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-40.6 percent changeStandard Error 13.2
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-49.8 percent changeStandard Error 10.6
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-17.5 percent changeStandard Error 10.3
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 84.0 percent changeStandard Error 11.2
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-31.9 percent changeStandard Error 10.3
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-59.8 percent changeStandard Error 11.2
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 84.0 mg/dLStandard Error 9.3
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 817.7 mg/dLStandard Error 6.5
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 811.3 mg/dLStandard Error 9.3
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.4 mg/dLStandard Error 7.2
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 810.5 mg/dLStandard Error 6.5
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 88.0 mg/dLStandard Error 7.2
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 87.5 mg/dLStandard Error 6.5
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 811.0 mg/dLStandard Error 7.2
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-51.7 mg/dLStandard Error 15.8
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-18.5 mg/dLStandard Error 11.1
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-35.3 mg/dLStandard Error 15.8
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-53.4 mg/dLStandard Error 12.2
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-15.3 mg/dLStandard Error 11.1
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-5.4 mg/dLStandard Error 12.2
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-34.2 mg/dLStandard Error 11.1
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 8-63.5 mg/dLStandard Error 12.2
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8

Absolute change in LDL-C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 8 value. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-83.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 19.5
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-27.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 15.9
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-55.5 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 20.8
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-88.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 16.5
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-32.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 15.9
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 80.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 17.4
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-55.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 15.9
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-104.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 17.4
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8

Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population (in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-0.121 mmol/LStandard Error 0.193
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-0.076 mmol/LStandard Error 0.157
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 80.168 mmol/LStandard Error 0.226
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 80.111 mmol/LStandard Error 0.188
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 80.117 mmol/LStandard Error 0.157
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-0.045 mmol/LStandard Error 0.172
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-0.402 mmol/LStandard Error 0.157
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-0.107 mmol/LStandard Error 0.172
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 85.9 mg/dLStandard Error 3.4
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 87.7 mg/dLStandard Error 2.8
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 85.5 mg/dLStandard Error 3.7
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 84.9 mg/dLStandard Error 2.9
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 82.4 mg/dLStandard Error 2.8
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 85.9 mg/dLStandard Error 3.1
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 82.2 mg/dLStandard Error 2.8
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 81.2 mg/dLStandard Error 3.1
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8

Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population (in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 80.003 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.022
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-0.021 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.017
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 80.007 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.073
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-0.025 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.02
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 80.023 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.018
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-0.031 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.019
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-0.002 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.017
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-0.120 gram/Liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.02
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-86.1 mg/dLStandard Error 20.8
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-28.7 mg/dLStandard Error 17
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-62.7 mg/dLStandard Error 22.1
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-88.5 mg/dLStandard Error 17.6
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-29.5 mg/dLStandard Error 17
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-0.6 mg/dLStandard Error 18.6
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-63.1 mg/dLStandard Error 17
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8-106.4 mg/dLStandard Error 18.6
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.363 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.123
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.262 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.087
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.370 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.123
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.402 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.096
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.190 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.087
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.086 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.096
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.282 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.087
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Ratio Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8-0.473 ratio (Apo B/Apo A-1)Standard Error 0.096
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-80.1 mg/dLStandard Error 21.4
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-20.8 mg/dLStandard Error 17.5
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-57.1 mg/dLStandard Error 22.8
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-84.4 mg/dLStandard Error 18.1
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-27.2 mg/dLStandard Error 17.5
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 85.3 mg/dLStandard Error 19.1
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-60.7 mg/dLStandard Error 17.5
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgAbsolute Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-105.1 mg/dLStandard Error 19.1
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 8

Combined estimate for percentage of participants was obtained by averaging out all the imputed percentage of participants reaching the level of interest. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000. In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.

Time frame: At Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 80.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 80.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 893.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 865.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 816.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 820.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 866.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L) at Week 880.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 8

Combined estimate for percentage of participants was obtained by averaging out all the imputed percentage of participants reaching the level of interest. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000. In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.

Time frame: At Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 8100.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 833.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 897.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 883.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 833.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 820.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 866.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) at Week 880.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 84.4 percent changeStandard Error 7.2
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 814.8 percent changeStandard Error 5.1
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 810.7 percent changeStandard Error 7.2
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 81.8 percent changeStandard Error 5.6
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 88.9 percent changeStandard Error 5.1
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 87.4 percent changeStandard Error 5.6
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 85.8 percent changeStandard Error 5.1
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 87.2 percent changeStandard Error 5.6
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline value and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed=participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-38.4 percent changeStandard Error 12.8
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-9.7 percent changeStandard Error 9.1
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-36.4 percent changeStandard Error 12.8
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-40.1 percent changeStandard Error 9.9
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-12.6 percent changeStandard Error 9.1
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-0.9 percent changeStandard Error 9.9
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-27.2 percent changeStandard Error 9.1
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 8-51.4 percent changeStandard Error 9.9
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12: Cohort 4

Adjusted LS means and standard error at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for Cohort 4 only.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12: Cohort 4-29.7 percent changeStandard Error 6.9
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12: Cohort 4-49.2 percent changeStandard Error 7.5
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8

Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population (in the two steps respectively; with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-0.4 percent changeStandard Error 19.6
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-4.0 percent changeStandard Error 16
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-7.4 percent changeStandard Error 28.4
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 814.5 percent changeStandard Error 19
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 819.3 percent changeStandard Error 16
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-3.1 percent changeStandard Error 17.5
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-32.1 percent changeStandard Error 16
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglyceride at Week 8-7.1 percent changeStandard Error 17.5
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 89.7 percent changeStandard Error 7.1
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 816.5 percent changeStandard Error 5.8
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 814.7 percent changeStandard Error 7.7
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 810.6 percent changeStandard Error 6.1
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 85.2 percent changeStandard Error 5.8
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 813.8 percent changeStandard Error 6.4
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 84.5 percent changeStandard Error 5.8
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 82.8 percent changeStandard Error 6.4
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8

Combined estimates and SE were obtained by combining adjusted means and SE from robust regression model analyses of the different imputed data sets. The robust regression models included the fixed categorical effect of alirocumab dose/dose regimen. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing values in the mITT population in the two steps respectively (with number of imputations = 1000). In the first step, the monotone missing pattern was induced in the multiply-imputed data. In the second step, the missing data at subsequent visits were imputed using the regression method for continuous variables.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 84.5 percent changeStandard Error 21.1
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-26.9 percent changeStandard Error 11.6
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 81.5 percent changeStandard Error 15.1
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-25.2 percent changeStandard Error 14.4
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 82.2 percent changeStandard Error 10.5
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-7.7 percent changeStandard Error 11.4
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 80.1 percent changeStandard Error 10.2
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 8-7.7 percent changeStandard Error 11.1
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baselines value and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8-39.6 percent changeStandard Error 11.9
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8-7.1 percent changeStandard Error 9.7
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8-39.7 percent changeStandard Error 12.5
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8-43.9 percent changeStandard Error 10
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8-14.4 percent changeStandard Error 9.7
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 83.2 percent changeStandard Error 10.7
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8-31.5 percent changeStandard Error 9.7
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C) at Week 8-54.6 percent changeStandard Error 10.7
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8

Adjusted LS means and SE at Week 8 were obtained from MMRM analysis, with fixed categorical effects of alirocumab dose/dose regimen, time point and dose/dose regimen-by-time point interaction. All available baseline values and post-baseline values in at least one of the analysis windows up to Week 8 were used in the model.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 30 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-29.0 percent changeStandard Error 9.7
Cohort 1 - Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-4.1 percent changeStandard Error 7.9
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 40 mg Q2W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-28.6 percent changeStandard Error 10.1
Cohort 2 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-34.2 percent changeStandard Error 8.1
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 75 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-10.7 percent changeStandard Error 7.9
Cohort 3 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 85.2 percent changeStandard Error 8.6
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W: <50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-24.0 percent changeStandard Error 7.9
Cohort 4 - Alirocumab 300 mg Q4W: >=50 kgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 8-41.8 percent changeStandard Error 8.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026