Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Linaclotide in Patients With Chronic Constipation and Prominent Abdominal Bloating

Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Chronic Constipation and Prominent Abdominal Bloating at Baseline

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01642914
Enrollment
487
Registered
2012-07-17
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2016-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Constipation, Constipation

Keywords

Chronic Constipation, Abdominal Bloating, Linaclotide

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linaclotide compared with placebo in patients with chronic constipation (CC) and prominent abdominal bloating. This study includes an up to 3-week screening period and a 2-3 week pretreatment period. Patients who are eligible will be randomized to one of two doses of linaclotide or placebo for 12 weeks. This 12-week study will assess the effects of linaclotide on bowel movement frequency, as well as other abdominal and bowel symptoms of CC.

Interventions

oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast

oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast

DRUGMatching placebo

oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast

Sponsors

Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has completed a colonoscopy according to the American Gastroenterological Association criteria with no clinically significant findings * Patient has successfully completed protocol procedures (with no clinically significant findings) * Patient meets protocol criteria for Chronic Constipation(CC): \< 3 bowel movements per week and reports one or more of the following symptoms for at least 12 weeks: 1. Straining during more than 25% of BMs 2. Lumpy or hard stools during more than 25% of BMs 3. Sensation of incomplete evacuation during more than 25% of BMs * Patient demonstrates continued chronic constipation and bloating through Pretreatment Period * Patient is compliant with Interactive voice response System (IVRS)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a history of loose or watery stools * Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) * Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility * Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that would limit the patient's ability to complete or participate in this clinical trial or could confound the study assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder12-week treatment periodA 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal BloatingBaseline and 12-week treatment periodAbdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.
Percent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal BloatingBaseline and 12-week treatment periodAbdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments score of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.
Percent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Abdominal bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline at Week 12 in Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during Week 12.
6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% Responder12-week treatment periodA patient was a 6/12 week abdominal bloating 30% responder if, for at least 6 weeks of the 12-week treatment period, that patient's improvement from baseline in the weekly abdominal bloating score was ≥ 30% from baseline.
Change From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency RateBaseline and 12-week treatment periodA patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over the 12 weeks of the treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.Baseline and Week 1A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 1 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.Baseline and Week 4A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 4 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 8Baseline and Week 8A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 8 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 12Baseline and Week 12A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 12 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in 12-Week SBM Frequency Rate12-week treatment periodA patient's Baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's 12-week SBM frequency rate was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over the 12 weeks of the treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 1Baseline and Week 1A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at week 1 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder12-week treatment periodA 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.
Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 8Baseline and Week 8A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at Week 8 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 12Baseline and Week 12A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at week 12 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM)Baseline and 12-week treatment periodA patient's baseline number of days with a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) was calculated as the number of days with at least 1 Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM), derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's number of days with a SBM during the Treatment Period was calculated as the number of days with at least 1 Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM), divided by treatment duration (in days), and multiplied by 7. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
SBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational Product24 hours from first dose of investigational product (Day 1)The proportion of patients with a SBM within 24 hours of first taking investigational product in each linaclotide dose group was compared with the proportion in the placebo group using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test controlling for geographic region. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Time to Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) After the First Dose of Investigational Product12-week treatment periodTime to first SBM after the first dose of investigation product was defined as the number of hours between the time of the first dose of investigational product to the occurrence of the first SBM. Patients who did not achieve an SBM were considered censored, with time to censoring defined as the number of hours elapsing from the time of the first dose of investigational product was taken to the end of the day of the last dose, at 12:00 AM (24:00 military time). Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in 12-week Stool ConsistencyBaseline and 12-week treatment periodStool consistency was measured using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS): 1. = separate hard lumps like nuts \[difficult to pass\] 2. = sausage shaped but lumpy 3. = like a sausage but with cracks on surface 4. = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. = soft blobs with clear-cut edges \[passed easily\] 6. = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. = watery, no solid pieces \[entirely liquid\] A patient's BSFS score for the baseline period (14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization) and for the 12-week treatment period, was the average of the nonmissing BSFS scores from the SBMs reported by the patient during the respective baseline and treatment periods. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in Stool Consistency at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Stool consistency was measured using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS): 1. = separate hard lumps like nuts \[difficult to pass\] 2. = sausage shaped but lumpy 3. = like a sausage but with cracks on surface 4. = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. = soft blobs with clear-cut edges \[passed easily\] 6. = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. = watery, no solid pieces \[entirely liquid\] A patient's BSFS score for the baseline period (14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization) and at week 12, was the average of the nonmissing BSFS scores from the SBMs reported by the patient during the respective baseline period and during Week 12. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in 12-week Severity of StrainingBaseline and 12-week treatment periodSeverity of straining was measured using a 5-point ordinal scale, where of value of 1 is not at all and a value of 5 is an extreme amount. A patient's straining score for baseline was derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's straining score for the treatment period was the average of the nonmissing straining scores from the SBMs reported by the patient during the 12-week treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Straining at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Severity of straining was measured using a 5-point ordinal scale, where of value of 1 is not at all and a value of 5 is an extreme amount. A patient's straining score for baseline was derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's straining score at Week 12 was the average of the nonmissing straining scores from the SBMs reported by that patient during analysis Week 12. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free Responder12-week treatment periodA patient was a 9/12 week mild straining and diarrhea-free responder if that patient met the weekly criterion for at least 9 weeks of the 12-week treatment period. A patient was considered to have met the weekly criterion in a given week if that patient had a nonmissing average straining score ≤ 2 (where a value of 1 represents no straining, an a value of 5 represents an extreme amount of straining), and the patient had no diarrhea adverse event (AE) reported for that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.
Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 4Baseline and Week 4A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at Week 4 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patient recruitment occurred at 136 study sites in the US and 5 study sites in Canada over a 6 month period from August of 2012 to February of 2013.

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled participants had up to 21 days of screening (screening period) to determine eligibility for entry into the study's pretreatment period. After an additional 14 to 21 days of pretreatment, those patients meeting entry criteria were randomized for 12 weeks of double-blind treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matching placebo Matching placebo: oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast
173
Linaclotide 145 Micrograms
Linaclotide 145 micrograms Linaclotide 145 micrograms: oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast
153
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms
Linaclotide 290 micrograms Linaclotide 290 micrograms: oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast
160
Total486

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event11715
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy942
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up537
Overall StudyOther Reason100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation15136
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5510

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLinaclotide 290 MicrogramsTotalPlaceboLinaclotide 145 Micrograms
Age, Continuous47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
47.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
46.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
48.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Age, Customized
Age 18 to 39 years
43 participants133 participants53 participants37 participants
Age, Customized
Age 40 to 64 years
99 participants307 participants104 participants104 participants
Age, Customized
Age ≥ 65 years
18 participants46 participants16 participants12 participants
BMI (Body Mass Index), mean29.83 kilograms per meter squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.57
29.12 kilograms per meter squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.23
28.43 kilograms per meter squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.03
29.17 kilograms per meter squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.03
Height, mean164.37 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.07
164.70 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08
164.87 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.65
164.85 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.44
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants4 participants3 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
47 participants148 participants47 participants54 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
25 participants70 participants26 participants19 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic
135 participants416 participants147 participants134 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants4 participants3 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
112 participants329 participants120 participants97 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
8 participants22 participants8 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
152 participants464 participants165 participants147 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
148 participants445 participants159 participants138 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
12 participants41 participants14 participants15 participants
Weight, mean80.53 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
79.12 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
77.59 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.19
79.39 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.01

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 17325 / 15333 / 160
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1734 / 1532 / 160

Outcome results

Primary

9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder

A 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.

Time frame: 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderResponder13 participants
Placebo9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderNonresponder158 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderResponder24 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderNonresponder129 participants
p-value: 0.026495% CI: [1.09, 4.56]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% Responder

A patient was a 6/12 week abdominal bloating 30% responder if, for at least 6 weeks of the 12-week treatment period, that patient's improvement from baseline in the weekly abdominal bloating score was ≥ 30% from baseline.

Time frame: 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% ResponderResponder50 participants
Placebo6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% ResponderNonresponder121 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% ResponderResponder62 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% ResponderNonresponder91 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% ResponderNonresponder90 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% ResponderResponder69 participants
Secondary

9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder

A 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.

Time frame: 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderResponder13 participants
Placebo9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderNonresponder158 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderResponder26 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 ResponderNonresponder133 participants
Secondary

9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free Responder

A patient was a 9/12 week mild straining and diarrhea-free responder if that patient met the weekly criterion for at least 9 weeks of the 12-week treatment period. A patient was considered to have met the weekly criterion in a given week if that patient had a nonmissing average straining score ≤ 2 (where a value of 1 represents no straining, an a value of 5 represents an extreme amount of straining), and the patient had no diarrhea adverse event (AE) reported for that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free ResponderResponder15 participants
Placebo9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free ResponderNonresponder156 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free ResponderResponder38 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free ResponderNonresponder115 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free ResponderResponder27 participants
Linaclotide 290 Micrograms9/12 Week Mild Straining and Diarrhea-free ResponderNonresponder132 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating

Abdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating-1.583 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.988
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating-2.476 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.315
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating-2.456 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency Rate

A patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over the 12 weeks of the treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency Rate1.020 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 1.596
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency Rate2.309 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.832
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency Rate2.292 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.79
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 12-Week SBM Frequency Rate

A patient's Baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's 12-week SBM frequency rate was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over the 12 weeks of the treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 12-Week SBM Frequency Rate1.480 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.198
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-Week SBM Frequency Rate3.481 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.085
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-Week SBM Frequency Rate3.550 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.382
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 12-week Severity of Straining

Severity of straining was measured using a 5-point ordinal scale, where of value of 1 is not at all and a value of 5 is an extreme amount. A patient's straining score for baseline was derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's straining score for the treatment period was the average of the nonmissing straining scores from the SBMs reported by the patient during the 12-week treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 12-week Severity of Straining-0.812 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.941
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-week Severity of Straining-1.495 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.938
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-week Severity of Straining-1.512 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.027
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 12-week Stool Consistency

Stool consistency was measured using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS): 1. = separate hard lumps like nuts \[difficult to pass\] 2. = sausage shaped but lumpy 3. = like a sausage but with cracks on surface 4. = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. = soft blobs with clear-cut edges \[passed easily\] 6. = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. = watery, no solid pieces \[entirely liquid\] A patient's BSFS score for the baseline period (14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization) and for the 12-week treatment period, was the average of the nonmissing BSFS scores from the SBMs reported by the patient during the respective baseline and treatment periods. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 12-week Stool Consistency0.797 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.129
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-week Stool Consistency1.925 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.358
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in 12-week Stool Consistency2.304 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 1 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.0.641 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 1.543
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.1.984 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.784
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.1.746 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.842
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 12

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 12 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 121.074 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 1.893
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 122.272 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.801
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 122.488 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 4 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.1.063 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.176
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.2.756 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.662
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.2.678 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.552
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 8

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 8 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 81.347 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.438
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 82.803 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 4.034
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 82.319 CSBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.989
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 1

A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at week 1 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 11.840 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.52
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 14.168 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 4.547
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 14.125 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 4.229
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 12

A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at week 12 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 121.288 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.221
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 123.085 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.399
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 122.983 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.616
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 4

A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at Week 4 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 41.420 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 2.882
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 44.045 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 4.172
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 43.872 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 4.563
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 8

A patient's baseline SBM frequency rate is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's SBM frequency rate at Week 8 was the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 81.638 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.093
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 83.674 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.784
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in SBM Frequency Rate at Week 83.785 SBMs per weekStandard Deviation 3.925
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Straining at Week 12

Severity of straining was measured using a 5-point ordinal scale, where of value of 1 is not at all and a value of 5 is an extreme amount. A patient's straining score for baseline was derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's straining score at Week 12 was the average of the nonmissing straining scores from the SBMs reported by that patient during analysis Week 12. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Straining at Week 12-1.021 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.184
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in Severity of Straining at Week 12-1.654 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in Severity of Straining at Week 12-1.686 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.117
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Stool Consistency at Week 12

Stool consistency was measured using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS): 1. = separate hard lumps like nuts \[difficult to pass\] 2. = sausage shaped but lumpy 3. = like a sausage but with cracks on surface 4. = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. = soft blobs with clear-cut edges \[passed easily\] 6. = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. = watery, no solid pieces \[entirely liquid\] A patient's BSFS score for the baseline period (14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization) and at week 12, was the average of the nonmissing BSFS scores from the SBMs reported by the patient during the respective baseline period and during Week 12. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Stool Consistency at Week 120.845 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.439
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in Stool Consistency at Week 122.061 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.478
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in Stool Consistency at Week 122.358 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.687
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM)

A patient's baseline number of days with a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) was calculated as the number of days with at least 1 Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM), derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's number of days with a SBM during the Treatment Period was calculated as the number of days with at least 1 Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM), divided by treatment duration (in days), and multiplied by 7. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM)1.086 Days per weekStandard Deviation 1.595
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM)2.279 Days per weekStandard Deviation 1.83
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM)2.143 Days per weekStandard Deviation 1.78
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Bloating

Abdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments score of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Bloating-22.65 percentage change of NRS scoreStandard Deviation 29.19
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsPercent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Bloating-34.52 percentage change of NRS scoreStandard Deviation 31.79
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsPercent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Bloating-34.22 percentage change of NRS scoreStandard Deviation 30.65
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12

Abdominal bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline at Week 12 in Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Reported outcome data is based on the 483 patient Intent-to-Treat Population. The distribution of each of the linaclotide groups was compared, in a pair-wise manner, to the placebo group using the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12-31.41 percentage change in abdominal bloatingStandard Deviation 40.78
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsPercent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12-45.43 percentage change in abdominal bloatingStandard Deviation 37.56
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsPercent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12-47.12 percentage change in abdominal bloatingStandard Deviation 33.55
p-value: 0.0054Kolmogorov-Smirnov
p-value: 0.0012Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Secondary

SBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational Product

The proportion of patients with a SBM within 24 hours of first taking investigational product in each linaclotide dose group was compared with the proportion in the placebo group using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test controlling for geographic region. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: 24 hours from first dose of investigational product (Day 1)

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational ProductResponder72 participants
PlaceboSBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational ProductNonresponder99 participants
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsSBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational ProductResponder94 participants
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsSBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational ProductNonresponder59 participants
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsSBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational ProductResponder94 participants
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsSBM Within 24 Hours After the First Dose of Investigational ProductNonresponder65 participants
p-value: 0.000695% CI: [0.086, 0.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.002295% CI: [0.064, 0.227]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Time to Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) After the First Dose of Investigational Product

Time to first SBM after the first dose of investigation product was defined as the number of hours between the time of the first dose of investigational product to the occurrence of the first SBM. Patients who did not achieve an SBM were considered censored, with time to censoring defined as the number of hours elapsing from the time of the first dose of investigational product was taken to the end of the day of the last dose, at 12:00 AM (24:00 military time). Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Time frame: 12-week treatment period

Population: 487 patients were randomized to treatment (Randomized Population). The Safety population consists of 486 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The Intent to Treat (ITT) population consists of 483 patients in the Safety population with valid post-baseline efficacy data. Reported outcome data is based on the ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) After the First Dose of Investigational Product28.07 Hours
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsTime to Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) After the First Dose of Investigational Product12.53 Hours
Linaclotide 290 MicrogramsTime to Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) After the First Dose of Investigational Product19.35 Hours
p-value: 0.005495% CI: [1.09, 1.72]Log Rank
p-value: 0.04795% CI: [0.99, 1.55]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026