Skip to content

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Ablation System Study

Study of Focused Circumferential UltraSound for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00392106
Enrollment
240
Registered
2006-10-25
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2008-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia, AF ablation, antiarrhythmic agent, catheter ablation, pulmonary veins

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the HIFU Pulmonary Vein Ablation System is effective in the treatment of paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation compared to the control of best medical therapy with FDA approved antiarrhythmic drugs.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia affecting an estimated 2.2 million persons in the United States (US). In addition to being debilitating, AF has been identified as a leading risk factor for stroke. AF is often associated with structural heart disease, but a substantial number of AF patients have little or no detectable structural heart disease. A patient with AF is up to 5 times more likely to have a stroke than the general population. Recently, it has been demonstrated that for a significant portion of AF patients (80% - 95 %) the arrhythmia originates in one of the four pulmonary veins (PV's). Furthermore, it has been shown that isolation of this arrhythmia by ablation can, in the majority of patients (50-70%), eliminate or markedly reduce episodes of AF. Currently, there are a number of modalities being investigated to treat AF. They include radiofrequency, laser, thermal, cryo, microwave, and ultrasound ablation of targeted areas in the atrium and/or PVs. Comparison(s): Clinical success of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, compared to medical therapy with anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs).

Interventions

Anti-arrhythmic drug prescribed for treatment of atrial fibrillation

DRUGflecainide

Anti-arrhythmic drug prescribed for the treatment of Atrial fibrillation

Anti-arrhythmic drug prescribed for treatment of atrial fibrillation

DRUGsotolol

Anti-arrhythmic Drug prescribed for treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Electrical isolation of pulmonary vein with high-intensity focused ultrasound

DRUGAmiodarone

Anti-arrhythmic Drug prescribed for the treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Sponsors

ProRhythm, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented atrial fibrillation * Failed or intolerant to at least 1 anti-arrhythmic drug * Able to take anti-coagulant therapy * Able to complete screening tests required for inclusion/

Exclusion criteria

* Able to take at least 1 approved anti-arrhythmic drug * Not pregnant * Available for follow-up for at least 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Acute treatment with elimination of AF episodes12 months
Death, stroke, and hospitalization for recurrence of AFwithin 12 months of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Acute treatment success60 days

Countries

Czechia, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026