Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary endpoint of the study is PFS as assessed by IRC per the Lugano Classification for NHL. The primary analysis is a comparison of PFS between Arm 1 (acalabrutinib plus BR) and Arm 2 (placebo plus BR).
Detailed description
Investigator-assessed PFS per the Lugano Classification for NHL, Investigator-assessed ORR (CR+PR) per the Lugano Classification for NHL, IRC-assessed ORR (CR+PR) per the Lugano Classification for NHL, OS, IRC-assessed DOR per the Lugano Classification for NHL, IRC assessed TTR per the Lugano Classification for NHL, IRC-assessed ORR (CR + PR) per Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007), PRO as measured by change in scores from baseline to each assessment using the FACT-Lym scale, PRO as measured by change in scores from baseline to each assessment using the EQ-5D-5L index score
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint of the study is PFS as assessed by IRC per the Lugano Classification for NHL. The primary analysis is a comparison of PFS between Arm 1 (acalabrutinib plus BR) and Arm 2 (placebo plus BR). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Investigator-assessed PFS per the Lugano Classification for NHL, Investigator-assessed ORR (CR+PR) per the Lugano Classification for NHL, IRC-assessed ORR (CR+PR) per the Lugano Classification for NHL, OS, IRC-assessed DOR per the Lugano Classification for NHL, IRC assessed TTR per the Lugano Classification for NHL, IRC-assessed ORR (CR + PR) per Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007), PRO as measured by change in scores from baseline to each assessment using the FACT-Lym scale, PRO as measured by change in scores from baseline to each assessment using the EQ-5D-5L index score | — |
Countries
Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain