Skip to content

A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, 3 Arm Phase 3 Study of Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chlorambucil, ACP 196 in Combination with Obinutuzumab, and ACP-196 Monotherapy in Subjects with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTIS
Registry ID
CTIS2023-509348-84-00
Acronym
ACE-CL-007
Enrollment
212
Registered
2024-07-11
Start date
2015-04-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Brief summary

The primary endpoint of the study is PFS as assessed by IRC review per IWCLL 2008 criteria. The primary analysis is a comparison of PFS between Arm A and Arm B.

Detailed description

"Efficacy: The first secondary endpoint is a comparison of IRC-assessed PFS between Arm A and Arm C. Other secondary endpoints are as follows and compare Arm A versus Arm B and Arm A versus Arm C • OS. Safety: • Frequency, severity, and relatedness of adverse events. • Frequency of adverse events requiring discontinuation of study drug or dose reductions. • Change in laboratory assessments. ", Efficacy: The first secondary endpoint is a comparison of IRC-assessed PFS between Arm A and Arm C. Other secondary endpoints are as follows and compare Arm A versus Arm B and Arm A versus Arm C • OS. Safety: • Frequency, severity, and relatedness of adverse events. • Frequency of adverse events requiring discontinuation of study drug or dose reductions. • Change in laboratory assessments.

Interventions

DRUGGazyvaro 1
DRUG000 mg concentrate for solution for infusion.

Sponsors

Acerta Pharma B.V.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint of the study is PFS as assessed by IRC review per IWCLL 2008 criteria. The primary analysis is a comparison of PFS between Arm A and Arm B.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
"Efficacy: The first secondary endpoint is a comparison of IRC-assessed PFS between Arm A and Arm C. Other secondary endpoints are as follows and compare Arm A versus Arm B and Arm A versus Arm C • OS. Safety: • Frequency, severity, and relatedness of adverse events. • Frequency of adverse events requiring discontinuation of study drug or dose reductions. • Change in laboratory assessments. ", Efficacy: The first secondary endpoint is a comparison of IRC-assessed PFS between Arm A and Arm C. Other secondary endpoints are as follows and compare Arm A versus Arm B and Arm A versus Arm C • OS. Safety: • Frequency, severity, and relatedness of adverse events. • Frequency of adverse events requiring discontinuation of study drug or dose reductions. • Change in laboratory assessments.

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Spain, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTIS · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026