Comparison of Haemodynamic response during tracheal intubation between C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Conventional Direct Laryngoscopes in normotensive patients :A randomized controlled study.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20201209003

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-12-09

Start date

2019-08-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

hemodynamic change blood pressure heart rate sore throat C&#45

Interventions

device for intubation,new device for intubation

No Intervention Device,Experimental Device

direct larygocsope,C&#45

MAC videolaryngoscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.patients underwent general anesthesia needed intubation 2.ASA 1-2 3.age 18-65

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.known case hypertension 2.on beta blocked for any reason 3.BMI>32 4.Pregnacy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
blood pressure and heart rate every 1 minute after intubation for 5 minutes from vital sign monitoring	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
sore throat 24 hr after operation post operative visit	—

Countries

thailand

Contacts

Public Contactbenjawan yoosamran

hatyai hospital

benjawan_y@hotmail.com0818975715

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026

Comparison of Haemodynamic response during tracheal intubation between C&#45;MAC Videolaryngoscope and Conventional Direct Laryngoscopes in normotensive patients :A randomized controlled study.