Skip to content

A comparative study between immediate loading protocol dental implant treatment in lower premolar and molar teeth using digital workflow and conventional dental implant treatment protocol: A randomized clinical trial

A comparative study between immediate loading protocol dental implant treatment in lower premolar and molar teeth using digital workflow and conventional dental implant treatment protocol: A randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20170919001
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-09-19
Start date
2017-01-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

missing mandibular premolar or mandibular molar tooth and have opposition teeth immediate loading dental implant&#44

Interventions

conventional loading dental implant (4.2x10 mm.),immediate loading dental implant with digital workflow (4.2x10 mm.)
Active Comparator Device,Experimental Device

Sponsors

Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai university
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Healthy and ready for surgical implantation 2 No history of psychosis 3 No uncontrolled bleeding disorder 4 No smoking or smoking less than 10 cigarettes day in the last 5 years 5 No intravenous injection of bisphosphonate medication 6 Never received head and neck radiotherapy 7 Can maintain good oral health 8 Good attitude towards implants and prostheses 9 Able and agree to undergo treatment and follow up for a total of at least 8 10 visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Unhealthy uncontrolled systemic disease Bleeding disorder ASA class III 2 Abnormal metabolism system 3 Long term on antibiotic or steroid 4 Heavy smoking over 10 cigarettes day 5 Alcoholism or drug abuse 6 On intravenous injection bisphosphonate medication 7 Experience of head and neck radiotherapy 8 Poor attitude towards implants and prostheses 9 Unable to maintain good oral hygiene or to clean prosthesis 10 Conditions that would prevent completion of study participation 11 Pregnacy 12 Disagree sign to consent 13 Unable to continue appointment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
sucess rate 12 months observation from periapical film and clinical examination,patient satisfaction 12 month questionare

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic bone loss 12 months millimetres

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactPathawee Khongkhunthian

Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai university

pathaweek@gmail.com0812806393

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026