Skip to content

Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Lypopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation and Executive Function

Investigating the Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Endotoxemia-Induced Inflammation and Core Executive Functioning: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07713641
Enrollment
56
Registered
2026-07-20
Start date
2025-10-24
Completion date
2027-03-30
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endotoxemia, Executive Function (Cognition), Inflammation

Keywords

scfa, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate, proprionate, acetate, lypopolysaccharide, lps, endotoxemia, lps challenge, experimental, inflammation, experimental inflammation, experimental endotoxemia, systemic inflammation, gut-brain axis, microbiota, microbiota-gut-brain axis, executive function, working memory, inhibition, cognitive inhibition, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, task switching, healthy volunteers, sickness behaviour

Brief summary

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are substances produced by gut bacteria when they ferment dietary fiber. They can act as signals between the gut and the brain and may help regulate the body's immune and stress responses. Earlier work has shown that delivering SCFAs to the colon can lower the stress hormone response to a mental stress task in healthy people, and laboratory studies suggest SCFAs can reduce inflammation. However, it is not yet known whether SCFAs can reduce inflammation in humans, or whether doing so protects mental performance. This study uses a controlled, acute, and short-lasting challenge. Healthy adults receive a single, low dose of a bacterial substance called lipopolysaccharide (LPS) through a vein. LPS briefly activates the immune system and causes mild, flu-like symptoms (such as fatigue, headache, and feeling unwell) that pass on their own within a few hours. It does not cause a real infection. Participants are randomly assigned to take either SCFA capsules or inactive placebo capsules on the morning of the test day, before the LPS challenge. Neither the participants, the researchers running the visit, nor the researchers analyzing the results know who received which capsules until the study is complete (triple-blind). The main goal of the study is to test whether SCFAs, compared with placebo, reduce the inflammatory response to LPS, measured by markers of inflammation in the blood. The study also examines whether SCFAs reduce the associated sickness symptoms and whether they protect performance on tasks that measure core executive functions: the ability to keep relevant information in mind (working memory), the ability to hold back automatic responses or thoughts (inhibition), and the ability to switch flexibly between tasks or rules (cognitive flexibility). Blood, saliva, and stool samples are collected to measure inflammation markers, SCFA levels, stress hormones, and gut bacteria. Participants attend a screening visit, a test day with monitoring for several hours, and a short follow-up visit the next day.

Detailed description

INFLEX is a single-center, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group interventional trial conducted at UZ Leuven / KU Leuven. Its primary aim is to test whether a single acute dose of colon-delivered SCFAs, relative to placebo, attenuates the systemic inflammatory response induced by experimental endotoxemia in healthy adults. Secondary aims are to test whether SCFAs attenuate LPS-induced sickness behaviour and mitigate endotoxemia-induced changes in core executive functioning, and to characterize associations between systemic SCFA uptake, the inflammatory response, and these outcomes. Eligible participants are randomized to receive SCFA colon-delivery capsule or placebo capsules, taken on the morning of the test day with a standardized low-fiber breakfast. One hour after capsule intake, participants receive a single intravenous bolus of purified Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (0.4 ng/kg body weight), which serves as a fixed inflammatory challenge applied to all participants. The timing is designed so that peak circulating SCFA concentrations (approximately 3-4 hours after colonic delivery) coincide with the peak of LPS-induced cytokines and sickness behaviour (approximately 2-3 hours post-injection). Participants are monitored for a minimum of 6 hours after the LPS challenge. Vital signs, sickness symptoms, and blood and saliva samples are collected hourly to quantify inflammatory markers (including IL-6 and hs-CRP), serum SCFA, cortisol, and ACTH. Core executive-function tasks are administered before and after the LPS challenge and at a 24-hour follow-up visit. A fecal sample collected at home prior to the test day is used for gut microbiota profiling. To standardize endogenous SCFA production, participants follow a low-fiber diet for three days before the test day and avoid caffeine, alcohol, and strenuous exercise beforehand. The night prior to the test day, participants are instructed to consume a standard dinner that is provided to them. The study comprises three visits: a screening visit (\ 1 hour), the laboratory test day (\ 8 hours), and a follow-up visit (\ 30 minutes) 24 hours after the LPS challenge.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTShort-Chain Fatty Acid Colon-Delivery Capsules

Single acute oral dose of pH-dependent colon-delivery capsules delivering a short-chain fatty acid mixture to the colon. The mixture comprises sodium acetate,sodium butyrate, and sodium propionate (54.4%, 21.2%, and 24.4% by weight), providing approximately 186 mmol total SCFA per dose (111 mmol acetate, 32 mmol butyrate, 43 mmol propionate). Capsules are sub-coated with hydroxypropylcellulose and coated with a pH-dependent layer (Eudragit FS 30 D with PlasACRYL T20). Taken on the morning of the test day with a standardized low-fiber breakfast.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo capsules

Single acute oral dose of placebo capsules containing microcrystalline cellulose and matching excipients, an inert non-fermentable substrate. Matched in appearance and number to the SCFA capsules and taken on the morning of the test day with a standardized low-fiber breakfast.

Single intravenous bolus of purified Escherichia coli-derived lipopolysaccharide (0.4 ng/kg body weight), administered one hour after capsule intake to all participants as a standardized experimental inflammatory challenge common to both study arms.

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER
University Hospital, Essen
CollaboratorOTHER
Flemish institute of biotechnology (VIB)
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Triple-blind design. Participants, study personnel administering the intervention and interacting with participants, outcome assessors, and the personnel performing the data analysis are all blinded to treatment allocation. Randomization and capsule allocation are performed by a collaborator not otherwise involved in the study. Capsules are labelled with a randomization number and kept in a non-transparent recipient. Blinding is maintained until database lock and completion of the primary analysis.

Intervention model description

Two-arm parallel-group design comparing SCFA colon-delivery capsules versus placebo. A single intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide (0.4 ng/kg body weight) is administered to all participants as a fixed inflammatory challenge condition.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Voluntary written informed consent obtained prior to any study procedure * Healthy, with no gastrointestinal or psychological complaints * Age 18-45 years * BMI 18.5-27 kg/m2 * Proficiency in English and/or Dutch

Exclusion criteria

* History of previous or current neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, migraine with aura) * History of previous or current psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia) * History of previous or current gastrointestinal disorder (e.g., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome) * History of previous or current endocrine disorder (e.g., diabetes, thyroid disorders, polycystic ovary syndrome) * History of immune system disorder, including inflammatory, autoimmune, or severe allergic conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, celiac disease, or severe allergies such as anaphylaxis) * History of neuropsychiatric disorder (e.g., ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, learning disorder, Tourette's syndrome) * History of major head trauma (e.g., concussion with loss of consciousness or long-term symptoms) * History of severe infection (e.g., sepsis, pneumonia requiring hospitalization, meningitis, endocarditis, or other systemic infection requiring hospitalization, intravenous antibiotics, or intensive care) * One or more diagnoses based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) * One or more diagnoses based on ROME-IV criteria for gastrointestinal disorders * Any disorder that, in the investigator's opinion, might jeopardise the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol * Any prior or concomitant treatment that might jeopardise the participant's safety or compromise the integrity of the study * Participation in an interventional trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device * Current or recent (past month) prescribed medication use, with particular attention to cardiovascular drugs, steroids, NSAIDs, and centrally-acting drugs (excluding isolated over-the-counter use such as ibuprofen or paracetamol, and hormonal contraceptives in women) * Use of psychotropic medication within the past year (e.g., antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics) * Use of antibiotics within three months preceding the study * Use of pre- or probiotics within one month preceding the study * Current or recent (past month) infection (e.g., common cold, influenza, COVID-19) * Recent (past month) vaccination * Pregnant or lactating women * Previous or current substance or alcohol dependence or abuse (\>2 units/day or \>14 units/week) * Smoking * Night-shift work * Adherence to special diets (e.g., vegan, vegetarian, weight-loss, lactose-free, gluten-free) * Previous experience with or knowledge of any of the cognitive tasks used in the study (questionnaires excluded) * C-reactive protein higher than 0.5mg/dL on the day of the injection. * Colour vision deficiency or colour-blindness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) response to the LPS challenge2 hours before LPS injection, and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on the systemic inflammatory response to experimental endotoxemia, indexed by serum IL-6 concentrations measured at serial timepoints across the test day following the intravenous LPS bolus. The primary analysis evaluates the treatment-by-timepoint interaction on the IL-6 time course using a linear mixed model, with treatment (SCFA vs. placebo) as a between-subject factor and timepoint as a within-subject factor.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine response to the LPS challenge2 hours before LPS injection, and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on serum concentrations of TNF-alpha, IL-1-beta, IFN-gamma, IL-8, IL-4, and IL-10. Analyzed as treatment-by-timepoint interactions using linear mixed models.
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) response to the LPS challenge2 hours before LPS injection, and at 2, 6, and 24 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentrations, measured at selected timepoints on the test day and at the 24-hour follow-up visit.
LPS-induced sickness behaviour (SicknessQ)2 hours before LPS injection, and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on subjective sickness behaviour, assessed with the Sickness Questionnaire (SicknessQ), analyzed across timepoints on the test day.
Body temperature response to the LPS challenge2 hours before LPS injection, and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on body temperature (degrees Celsius).
Heart rate response to LPS challenge2 hours before LPS injection, and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on heart rate (beats per minute) across the monitoring period.
Blood pressure response to the LPS challenge2 hours before LPS injection, and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg).
Salivary cortisol response to the LPS challengeAt 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on salivary cortisol concentrations (ng/ml).
Plasma ACTHAt 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on plasma ACTH concentrations (ng/l)
Working memory performance (3-back task)2 hours before LPS injection, 2.25 hours after LPS injection, and 24 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on working memory, assessed with the 3-back task (primary index: d-prime). Assessed at baseline (pre-LPS), post-LPS on the test day, and at the 24-hour follow-up.
Response inhibition (Stop Signal Task)2 hours before LPS injection, 2.25 hours after LPS injection, and 24 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on response inhibition, assessed with the Stop Signal Task (outcome: stop-signal reaction time, SSRT, in milliseconds).
Cognitive flexibility - task switching (Number-Letter task)2 hours before LPS injection, 2.25 hours after LPS injection, and 24 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on cognitive flexibility, assessed with the Number-Letter task (outcome: switch cost, in milliseconds).
Cognitive inhibition (Stroop task)2 hours before LPS injection, 2.25 hours after LPS injection, and 24 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on cognitive inhibition, assessed with the Stroop task (outcome: congruency effect, in milliseconds).
Cognitive flexibility - set shifting (Wisconsin Card Sorting Task)2 hours before LPS injection, 2.25 hours after LPS injection, and 24 hours after LPS injectionEffect of SCFA versus placebo on cognitive flexibility, assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (outcome: number of perseverative errors).
Systemic SCFA uptake (serum SCFA concentrations)2 hours before LPS injection, and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after LPS injectionSerum concentrations of acetate, propionate, and butyrate, assessed as a measure of systemic SCFA uptake to confirm target engagement of the colon-delivery intervention, and used as a mediator in mechanistic analyses of treatment effects on the inflammatory response.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTFranco Ruiz, M.D.
franco.ruiz@kuleuven.be+32456716114
CONTACTDina Satriawan, M.D., Mnsci(Adv)
dina.satriawan@kuleuven.be+32 16 71 03 66
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLukas Van Oudenhove, MD, PhD

Laboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKristin Verbeke, PhD

Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBoushra Dalile, PhD

Laboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026