Skip to content

Abemaciclib Dose Escalation in Early High-Risk Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy

Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Abemaciclib Dose Escalation Strategy in Adjuvant Therapy for Early High-Risk Breast Cancer

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07599137
Acronym
ADES
Enrollment
86
Registered
2026-05-20
Start date
2026-05-30
Completion date
2028-02-01
Last updated
2026-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer

Keywords

breast cancer, Abemaciclib, Dose Escalation, side effect

Brief summary

Abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy has become one of the important adjuvant treatment regimens for patients with HR+/HER2- high-risk early breast cancer. However, adverse events such as diarrhea, fatigue, neutropenia and elevated liver enzymes are concentrated in the early stage of adjuvant therapy, which often lead to dose reduction, temporary drug interruption or even permanent discontinuation. This further affects treatment adherence, relative dose intensity (RDI) and treatment completion rate. Findings from the TRADE study suggest that a step-up dosing strategy, initiating at a lower dose followed by gradual titration to the standard dose, combined with standardized patient education and symptomatic management, may improve early treatment tolerance, reduce the burden of partial toxicities, and increase the likelihood of patients achieving and maintaining abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily. Based on the above evidence and clinical experience, step-up dosing has been adopted by some clinicians for real-world clinical practice. Nevertheless, existing evidence is mainly derived from non-Chinese populations. There is still a lack of systematic real-world data on step-up dosing among Chinese breast cancer patients under routine outpatient management, including the early toxicity profile, dose escalation achievement rate at each stage, dose adjustment pathways (prolonged escalation, treatment pause or dose de-escalation), RDI distribution, correlation with quality of life, and baseline factors affecting treatment tolerance and dose target attainment. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a real-world study focused on Chinese patients to fill the gap in local clinical evidence, and provide a basis for clinical pathway formulation, patient education, and subsequent multicenter validation studies.

Interventions

Patients receiving postoperative abemaciclib step-up dosing regimen. Dose escalation schedule: 100 mg BID (Weeks 1-4), 100/150 mg daily (Weeks 5-8), 150 mg BID (Weeks 9-12).

Patients receiving postoperative abemaciclib step-up dosing regimen. Dose escalation schedule: 100 mg BID (Weeks 1-4), 100/150 mg daily (Weeks 5-8), 150 mg BID (Weeks 9-12).

Sponsors

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged ≥18 years; * Pathologically confirmed breast cancer with ER and/or PR positive, HER2 negative; * Completed radical mastectomy/radiacal breast surgery; * Plan to receive abemaciclib combined endocrine therapy for at least 12 weeks, with abemaciclib administered via a step-up dosing regimen; * ECOG performance status 0-1; * Adequate organ function meeting medication requirements (routine blood test, liver and renal function, and other indicators consistent with clinical medication safety criteria); * Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous exposure to any CDK4/6 inhibitor; * Active infection or severe infection requiring systemic anti-infective treatment; * Significant gastrointestinal diseases such as chronic diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease, short bowel syndrome, which may affect drug absorption or increase the risk of diarrhea; * Significant baseline hepatic or renal dysfunction, or uncontrolled severe comorbidities judged by the investigator to affect safety or treatment adherence; * Pregnancy or lactation; * Any other condition deemed ineligible for enrollment by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of inadequate dosingFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeksProportion of patients with inadequate dosing from postoperative treatment initiation to week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose Target Attainment and Treatment IntensityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks"Proportion of patients achieving 150 mg BID at Week 12.
QoL deterioration rateFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks.Proportion of patients experiencing a deterioration in health-related quality of life defined as a decrease of ≥10 points from baseline through EORTC QLQ-C30.

Contacts

CONTACTLize Wang, Doctor
lize2010@163.com+86-010-88197830

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 21, 2026