Skip to content

Intensification Treatment of Ovarian Cancer by PIPAC

Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) as a Component of Combined Treatment in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Randomized Phase II Trial (PrimPIPAC)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07514494
Acronym
PrimPIPAC
Enrollment
160
Registered
2026-04-07
Start date
2025-04-02
Completion date
2030-04-02
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Keywords

PIPAC, Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, Peritoneal carcinomatosis, Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, First-line treatment

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether repeated cisplatin-based PIPAC added to standard TC chemotherapy can improve outcomes in women aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed FIGO IIIB-IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer and visually detectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. The main questions are whether repeated PIPAC increases the rate of complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0) and whether it improves disease control, survival outcomes, and safety compared with standard combined treatment including a single PIPAC procedure. Participants will undergo screening, intraoperative randomization, systemic chemotherapy, PIPAC procedures according to study arm, interval cytoreductive surgery, protocol-specified postoperative treatment if needed, and regular follow-up assessments.

Detailed description

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is frequently accompanied by peritoneal carcinomatosis, which is a major determinant of treatment failure and poor long-term prognosis. Although systemic platinum-taxane chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery remain the foundation of first-line management, outcomes are substantially worse when intraperitoneal tumor burden is high and complete cytoreduction is difficult to achieve. In this setting, additional locoregional treatment strategies may help improve intraperitoneal disease control while preserving the feasibility of multimodal therapy. The present study evaluates pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as an investigational component of combined first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination. PIPAC delivers intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol during laparoscopy and is intended to enhance spatial distribution and tissue penetration of the drug while limiting systemic exposure. In this protocol, cisplatin-based PIPAC is integrated into the treatment pathway at predefined operative stages together with standard TC systemic chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery. The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled phase II trial comparing a strategy of repeated PIPAC incorporated across the course of induction and surgical treatment with a comparison strategy in which PIPAC is delivered only once during interval cytoreductive surgery. The protocol also includes further protocol-directed treatment for patients in whom complete cytoreduction is not achieved. At the diagnostic operative stage, disease extent is documented using intra-abdominal assessment including ascites evaluation, mapping of visceral and parietal peritoneal involvement, and calculation of the Peritoneal Cancer Index. Peritoneal, ovarian, and omental tissue samples are obtained for histologic verification and subsequent treatment-response assessment. PIPAC is administered laparoscopically under general anesthesia using cisplatin diluted in normal saline, delivered into a carbon dioxide capnoperitoneum under controlled pressure and flow conditions with a fixed exposure time. Interval cytoreductive surgery is planned after induction treatment, and when indicated, an additional intraoperative PIPAC procedure is performed before abdominal-wall closure. Throughout the study, participants undergo protocol-defined clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathologic evaluations during treatment and follow-up. Serial reassessment of intraperitoneal disease, biopsy-based morphologic evaluation, tumor-marker monitoring, and adverse-event documentation are used to characterize treatment activity and tolerability over time. Follow-up continues at regular intervals after completion of therapy and includes oncologic surveillance and quality-of-life assessment. Safety oversight includes detailed documentation of adverse events and specific operating-room precautions intended to minimize occupational exposure during aerosolized intraperitoneal chemotherapy procedures. Study conduct, documentation, and confidentiality are governed by protocol-defined data-management procedures and ethical requirements, including written informed consent and ethics committee approval before study initiation and for major protocol amendments. This trial is intended not only to evaluate the clinical contribution of repeated PIPAC in the first-line setting, but also to refine a practical treatment sequence for combining intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, interval surgery, and postoperative management in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPIPAC

Performed laparoscopically under general anesthesia. Drug: cisplatin 30 mg/m² diluted in 180 mL normal saline Administration: * Capnoperitoneum established with carbon dioxide at a target pressure of 12-14 mmHg. * Flow settings depend on nozzle size: No. 150, 0.3-0.4 mL/s; No. 200, 0.7-0.8 mL/s. * Nebulizer selection depends on patient height and body-mass index; tense ascites is evacuated before treatment. * The aerosol flow is directed toward the largest free intraperitoneal space and away from hollow viscera, ligated vessels, and tumor beds. * Exposure time is maintained for exactly 30 minutes. * The abdomen is decompressed without aspirating the cytostatic solution, and no drain is left in place.

Sponsors

Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study has three arms: one arm is the neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy and CRS, the second is the neoadjuvant PIPAC test arm, intravenous chemotherapy and CRS, the third arm consists of patients from both groups with CRS R2 (the group with added PIPAC after the 5th course of intravenous chemotherapy)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female, age 18-75 years. * Histologically verified ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. * FIGO stage IIIB or IIIC. * visually detectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. * Peritoneal metastatic involvement documented preoperatively by ultrasound, CT, MRI, PET-CT, or equivalent imaging. * Ability to comply with protocol procedures and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \> 75 years; ECOG 3-4; cachexia with BMI \<= 16. * Severe concomitant disease in exacerbation or decompensation. * Extra-abdominal metastases, including metastatic pleuritis. * Mucinous ovarian carcinoma or another active malignant neoplasm, except malignancies in clinical remission for more than 2 years. * Pronounced adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 status. * Any condition precluding safe PIPAC or protocol execution, including hollow-organ perforation, gastrointestinal resection with anastomosis, or repair of a hollow-viscus defect. * Refusal of treatment at any study stage.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0)At interval cytoreductive surgery (Visit 4), approximately 9 to 12 weeks after randomizationThe proportion of participants who achieve complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0) at interval cytoreductive surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalFrom randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatmentTime from randomization to death from any cause.
Progression-free survivalFrom randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatmentTime from randomization to radiologic, clinical, or pathologic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Recurrence rateFrom completion of treatment through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years Recurrence rate is named among the secondary endpoints.Proportion of participants with documented disease recurrence after completion of protocol treatment.
Time to progressionFrom randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatmentTime from randomization to first documented disease progression.
Ascites responseDuring treatment through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment The protocol identifies rate of ascites accumulation as a secondary endpoint and also requires ascites-volume assessment at each operative stage.Rate of ascites accumulation during treatment and follow-up, including change in ascites volume over time.
Tumor marker responseDuring treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment The protocol specifies the proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in tumor-marker levels as a secondary endpoint.Proportion of participants with at least a 50% reduction in tumor-marker levels from baseline.
Frequency and severity of adverse eventsFrom informed consent through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatmentIncidence, type, and severity of adverse events recorded after informed consent, including treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events.
Intestinal paresisDuring treatment, assessed through completion of treatment Intestinal paresis is specifically listed among the secondary endpoints (assessed up to 6 months)Incidence of postoperative intestinal paresis during protocol treatment.
Laboratory abnormalitiesDuring treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment Laboratory abnormalities are included in the secondary endpoint list, and laboratory testing is performed repeatedly during treatment and follow-up.Incidence and severity of clinically significant hematologic and biochemical laboratory abnormalities during protocol treatment.
Wound-healing timeFrom the date of surgery to complete wound healing, assessed up to 30 days after each study-related surgical procedureTime to postoperative wound healing after protocol-defined surgical procedures.

Countries

Russia

Contacts

CONTACTAlexey S. Dzasokhov, MD, PhD
dzasokhov-pipac@mail.ru+79295596135
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlexey S. Dzasokhov, MD, PhD

Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary

STUDY_CHAIRSergei O. Gunyakov

Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026