Skip to content

Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Enhance Memory in Aging

Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Enhance Memory in Aging

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07214194
Acronym
VNS
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-10-09
Start date
2027-02-28
Completion date
2028-07-31
Last updated
2025-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Aging

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine whether non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation enhances memory formation in cognitively healthy older adults and whether the effects of stimulation depend on gut and brain health.

Interventions

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation will be delivered with a well-validated device. taVNS delivers stimulation on the left ear, with the placement of the stimulating electrode differing between the active and sham conditions. Stimulation will occur during each learning trial (total of 30 trials per phase).

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Because the active electrode will be placed on the cymba conchae and the sham on the earlobe, full double-blinding is not feasible; as such, the experimenter will be aware of the active/sham condition status of each experimental block. Participants will be masked/blinded to condition order and hypotheses (they will not be informed which blocks are active vs. sham).

Intervention model description

The study will use a sham-controlled, single-blind, within-subject, counterbalanced, randomized design. Each participant will complete four blocks (two active and two sham stimulation) in a counterbalanced within-subject design using an ABBA or BAAB order (A = active taVNS, B = sham stimulation). To ensure equal numbers per order, order will be deterministically assigned by subject ID parity: odd = ABBA, even = BAAB. Subject IDs will be issued sequentially within the age group, yielding balance in both Young and Older groups and effective random assignment of participants to order condition.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18-30 years or 65-80 years * Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (visual acuity) * Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant * Symptoms of memory loss * History of a neurological, psychiatric, or medical condition that could affect cognition or preclude MRI or pupillometry * Use of medications known to alter cognition * For older adults, neuropsychological performance that falls outside 1.5 standard deviations of age-adjusted norms and no self-reported memory or attention complaints

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Recognition Memory (d-prime)post-active vs post-sham stimulation; up to 2 hours of taskd' is a signal-detection sensitivity index-how well participants discriminate old (studied) from new (unstudied) items, independent of response bias. Computed as d' = Z(hit rate) - Z(false-alarm rate) from the old/new recognition memory test. Primary analysis is within-person Δhigh-confidence d' (based on sure old responses in the 4-point sure old, unsure old, unsure new, sure new scale, Δ = active - sham) and Δoverall d' (based on sure old and unsure old responses). Main comparison is older vs. young, and within the older group also testing moderation by gut-brain axis measures and interactions with preclinical Alzheimer's disease pathology (pTau217, pTau181, Aβ42:40).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026