Skip to content

Pilot Study of a School Based Intervention for Coping With Climate Change

Eco-anxiety and Coping in Children: Results From a Pilot Randomized Cluster Trial Evaluating the Impact of a Creative Arts and Philosophical Inquiry Intervention for Elementary School Students

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07095387
Enrollment
87
Registered
2025-07-31
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2024-05-25
Last updated
2025-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eco-anxiety

Keywords

art-intervention, philosophy inquiry, eco-anxiety, coping with climate change, school-based intervention

Brief summary

The present study aimed to evaluate the impacts of a school-based program that combined creative arts and philosophy inquiry to discuss climate change emotions with children. The objective was to determine if there were changes that could be seen in the group that participated in the weekly workshops (total of 7 workshops) compared to the group who did not participate (control group). A questionnaire was administered to all children before the intervention began and after it finished to compare scores on the variables of coping with climate change, eco-anxiety, intolerance to distress, general anxiety, and self-determination.

Interventions

This intervention combined creative arts workshops using drawing, photography, painting and collage to introduce a theme related to climate change and promote emotional expression. The artistic creation was followed by a philosophical inquiry group discussion on a theme related to the artistic creation to allow critical thinking and sharing perceptions.

Sponsors

Bishop's University
CollaboratorOTHER
Université du Québec a Montréal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized cluster trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Elementary school student in recruited classrooms

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Coping with climate changeBaseline and 8 weeksThe Coping with Climate Change Scale for Adolescents developed by Ojala (2012) uses a Likert-type scale (0 = not true at all for me; 4 = completely true for me) to measure three coping dimensions (problem coping, avoidance coping, and meaning coping). Lower scores represent less usage of this coping strategy, while higher scores indicate high usage of this coping strategy.
Eco-anxietyBaseline and 8 weeksThe Hogg Eco-anxiety Scale (2021) was adapted to children by making the language more accessible. The scale is rated on a 4-point Likert type scale (0 = Never, 3 = Almost every day), and higher scores indicate higher eco-anxiety (worst outcomes).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intolerance to distressBaseline and 8 weeksThe Distress Intolerance Index for Youth (Keller, 2019) uses a 5-point Likert type scale (0 = Not at all true for me to 4 = Very true for me), and higher scores indicate higher intolerance to distress (worst outcome).
General anxietyBaseline and 8 weeksThe Behavior Assessment Scale for Children 3rd edition for Canadian francophones (BASC-III; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2015) uses a Likert-type scale (0 = never to 3 = almost always), and higher scores indicate higher anxiety symptoms (worst outcome).
Self-determinationBaseline and 8 weeksThe Self-Determination at School Scale (Savard et al., 2013) uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (from 0 = Almost never to 4 = Almost always) where higher scores indicate higher levels of self-determination (better outcome).

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026