Morphine, Oliceridine, Safety, Sufentanil, Validity
Conditions
Keywords
Sufentanil, Safety, Morphine, oliceridine
Brief summary
Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oliceridine versus morphine and sufentanil for postoperative analgesia following elective lumbar spine surgery. Methods: In this randomized, controlled trial, 90 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery were allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) with either oliceridine (Group O，1.5mg oliceridine for loading dose， 0.5mg/kg oliceridine for PICA), morphine (Group M，4mg morphine for loading dose，1.5mg/kg morphine for PICA), or sufentanil (Group S，4ug sufentanil for loading dose，1.5ug/kg sufentanil for PICA). The primary outcome was the movement Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 6 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included resting and movement VAS scores, ramsay sation score at 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (excluding the motor VAS score at 6 hours postoperatively); number of PCIA demands and rescue analgesic requirements within 48 hours; hemodynamic parameters at 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after administration of the initial loading dose. The incidence of adverse events within 48 hours postoperatively, such as nausea and vomiting, somnolence, respiratory depression, or pruritus.
Interventions
DRUGOliceridine
a loading dose of 1.5 mg of oliceridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 oliceridine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
DRUGMorphine
a loading dose of 4 mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
DRUGSufentanil
A 4 ug loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 ug.kg-1 h-1 was connected. sufentanil was mixed with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
Sponsors
Anqing Municipal Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Lumbar spine surgery with ASA grades I-III * Aged 18-65 years * Ethically, the patient voluntarily accepted this trial and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
* Severe respiratory and circulatory system diseases * Nervous system disease * Mental and psychological disorders * Abnormal liver and kidney functions * Participated in another drug clinical research within the past 30 days
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| the movement Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score | at 6 hours postoperatively |
Countries
China
Contacts
CONTACTSun Ling Lu Sun Ling LU, Master's degree
Outcome results
None listed