Skip to content

Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Case of Tumor Spread to Lymph Nodes in the Armpit in Breast Cancer

SENOMAC-ULTRA: A Prospective Randomised Trial on the Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Ultrasound-detectable Axillary Metastases in Primary Breast Cancer Treated by Upfront Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06869629
Acronym
SENOMAC-ULTRA
Enrollment
1380
Registered
2025-03-11
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2040-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Carcinoma, Breast Cancer, Breast Surgery

Keywords

axillary metastases, axillary lymph node dissection, targeted axillary dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary ultrasonography

Brief summary

SENOMAC-ULTRA enrols patients who are planned for upfront surgery for a breast cancer that has spread to lymph nodes in the armpit, and that have been detected already prior to surgery by imaging, e.g. ultrasonography. In this situation, a full axillary lymph node dissection, removing more than 10 lymph nodes from the arm pit, is unnecessarily extensive in about half of the patients. More extensive surgery leads to a risk for arm lymphedema and functional problems with the arm and shoulder region, which should be avoided if not beneficial for diagnosis or prognosis. This trial seeks to ascertain that less extensive surgery, performed by only removing the first lymph node/s in the armpit (the sentinel lymph node/s) and the known metastatic lymph nodes (targeted axillary dissection, TAD), offers non-inferior survival outcomes to a full axillary lymph node dissection.

Interventions

Known metastases are marked before surgery and removed together with a sentinel lymph node biopsy

Routine axillary clearance removing about 10+ lymph nodes from axillary levels I and II

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Non-inferiority open randomised design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with primary invasive breast cancer clinical stage II-III * Palpable or non-palpable axillary metastases visible by ultrasound (other imaging accepted if confirmatory ultrasound is performed) and confirmed by fine needle aspiration or core biopsy * Written informed consent * Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Distant metastases * Ipsilateral metastases in internal mammary, infra- or supraclavicular lymph nodes without confirmed axillary nodal involvement * Preoperative suspicion of extensive nodal involvement, i.e. locally advanced disease * Nodes fixed to each other or to neighbouring structures on palpation or imaging * History of contralateral invasive breast cancer within 5 years * Bilateral invasive breast cancer if (i) one side meets any

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence-free survival5 yearsTime to event where an event is death if any cause or a recurrence of breast cancer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arm morbidity1, 3, 5 yearsArm function as reported by patients via the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF), which consists of 29 questions about impairments in function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions of patients with breast cancer and arm lymphedema. The questionnaire is divided into 5 domains: physical function, mental function, household activities, mobility activities, and life and social activities. Each item is scored on a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm) resulting in domain scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more severe arm dysfunction. Lymph-ICF scores also categorize into no problem, a small problem, a moderate problem, a severe problem, and a very severe problem.
Health-related quality of life1, 3, 5 yearsHealth-related quality of life measured by EORTC C30. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire measures HRQoL among cancer patients in general and consists of 30 items divided into multi-item scales and single items. The multi-item scales include one global health and quality of life (QoL) scale, five function subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) and three symptom subscales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain). The single items are dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties. Each scale produces a total score from 0 to 100. High scores on functional subscales indicate better function, and high scores on symptom subscales indicate more severe problems.
Overall survival5 yearsTime to event where an event is death of any cause
Health-related quality of life - breast cancer1, 3, 5 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire measures functions and symptoms related to breast cancer treatment and consists of 23 items divided into two functional subscales (body image and sexuality) and three symptom subscales (systemic therapy side effects, arm symptoms, breast symptoms) and three single items (sexual enjoyment, upset by hair loss, future perspective). The functional and symptom subscales as well as the single items correspond to a response scale 1-4 (not at all, a little, quite a bit, very much). Each scale produces a total score from 0 to 100. High scores on functional subscales indicate better function, and high scores on symptom subscales indicate more severe problems.

Contacts

Primary ContactJana de Boniface, Professor
jana.de-boniface@ki.se+46702472305

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026