Trichuris Trichiura; Infection, Hookworm Infection, Ascaris Lumbricoides Infection
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to provide evidence on the efficacy, safety and acceptability of the new, chewable formulation of oxantel pamoate administered as a single dose or multiple doses, compared to mebendazole in children infected with T. trichiura. This study will involve children aged 2-12 years, since an infection with T. trichiura occurs often in children.
Interventions
Tablets containing 250 mg oxantel pamoate
Tablets containing 500 mg mebendazole
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged between 2 and 12 years. * Written informed consent signed by parents/caregivers (signature or thumbprint) and, for children aged 6-12 years, written assent from the child. * Agree to comply with study procedures, including provision of two stool samples at the baseline and at follow-up assessment 14-21 days after treatment, respectively. * At least two out of four Kato-Katz thick smears positive for T. trichiura at baseline. * Willing to be examined by a study physician prior to treatment.
Exclusion criteria
* Presence or signs of major systemic illness or abnormal physical findings at screening, e.g. severe anaemia (Hb level \<80 g/L according to WHO) upon initial clinical assessment. * Known allergy to study medication (i.e. oxantel pamoate, mebendazole or any of the excipients). * Use of anthelminthic drugs within 4 weeks before or during study period. * Being prescribed or taking concomitantly medication with known contraindication or drug interactions with the study medication. * Actively participating in other clinical trials during the study. * Pregnancy (female participants that report to have reached menarche
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cure rate (CR) of oxantel pamoate single dose compared to mebendazole T. trichiura | 14-21 days after treatment | CR will be calculated as the percentage of Trichuris trichiura egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Egg reduction rate (ERR) of oxantel pamoate single dose compared to mebendazole against T. trichiura | 14-21 days after treatment | Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. Geometric and arithmetic mean egg counts will be calculated for the two treatment arms before and after treatment to assess the corresponding ERRs. |
| Cure rate (CR) and egg reduction rate (ERR) of oxantel pamoate multiple doses compared to oxantel single dose against T. trichiura | 14-21 days after treatment | CR and ERR will be calculated as described in primary outcome measure and the first listed secondary outcome measure, respectively. |
| Cure rate (CR) and egg reduction rate (ERR) of oxantel pamoate multiple doses compared to mebendazole against T. trichiura | 14-21 days after treatment | CR and ERR will be calculated as described in primary outcome measure and the first listed secondary outcome measure, respectively. |
| Cure rates (CRs) and egg reduction rates (ERRs) of oxantel pamoate compared to mebendazole against Ascaris lumbricoides and hookworm infections in co-infected participants | 14-21 days after treatment | CR and ERR will be calculated as described in primary outcome measure and the first listed secondary outcome measure, respectively. |
| Number of adverse events (AE) to assess safety and tolerability of oxantel pamoate administered as a single dose or as multiple doses, and compared with mebendazole | 3 hours, 24 hours (and 48 and 72h for the multiple dose treatment arm) and 14-21 days after treatment | Participants will be monitored at the site for 3 hours following treatment for any acute AEs. Participants will be interviewed 3 hours after treatment, as well as 24 hours after every dose received, as well as 14-21days after the last treatment dose about the occurrence of AEs. AEs will be evaluated descriptively as the difference of proportion reported AEs before and after treatment. |
Countries
Tanzania