Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of LNZ101 and LNZ100 for the Presbyopia

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of LNZ101 and LNZ100 for the Treatment of Presbyopia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06045299
Enrollment
300
Registered
2023-09-21
Start date
2023-09-27
Completion date
2025-01-27
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia, Near Vision, Miosis, Eye Diseases

Keywords

Presbyopia, Pharmaceutical Solutions, Opthalmic Solutions, Eye Drops, Miotic

Brief summary

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of LNZ101 and LNZ100 for the Treatment of Presbyopia

Detailed description

A multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study . To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LNZ101 (Aceclidine 1.75%/Brimonidine 0.08%)/LNZ100 (Aceclidine 1.75%) compared with placebo for the treatment of presbyopia.

Interventions

Aceclidine+Brimonidine combination ophthalmic solution

Aceclidine ophthalmic solution

Placebo (Vehicle) ophthalmic solution

Sponsors

LENZ Therapeutics, Inc
CollaboratorOTHER
Corxel Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Be able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to any study procedure being performed; 2. Be able and willing to follow all instructions and attend all study visits; 3. Be 45-75 years of age of either sex at Visit 1; 4. Have +1.00 to -4.00 diopter (D) of sphere calculated in minus cylinder in both eyes determined by manifest refraction documented at Visit 1; 5. Have ≤2.00 D of cylinder (minus cylinder) in both eyes determined by manifest refraction documented at Visit 1; 6. Have +1.00 D to -4.00 D manifest refraction spherical equivalent(MRSE)of Spherical equivalent (SE) determined by manifest refraction documented at Visit 1. 7. Be presbyopic as determined at Visit 2 baseline

Exclusion criteria

1. Be a female of childbearing potential who is currently pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy; 2. Have known contraindications or sensitivity to the use of any of the study medications or their components; 3. Have an active ocular infection at Visit 1 or at Visit 2 (bacterial, viral, or fungal), positive history of an ocular herpetic infection, preauricular lymphadenopathy, or ongoing, active ocular inflammation (e.g., moderate to severe blepharitis, allergic conjunctivitis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, scleritis, uveitis) in either eye; 4. Have moderate or severe dry eye at Visit 1, assessed by corneal fluorescein staining; 5. Have clinically significant abnormal lens findings (e.g., cataract) including early lens changes and/or any evidence of a media opacity during dilated slitlamp biomicroscopy and fundus exam documented within 3 months of Visit 1 or at Visit 1;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at 40 cm3 hours post-treatment in the study eye at Visit 2 (Day 1)Percentage of subjects who achieve a 3-line (15-letter) or greater improvement from baseline in the measurement of monocular BCDV at 40 cm and no loss in BCDVA ≥ 5 letters (ETDRS chart at 4 m)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026