Skip to content

Mental Intervention and Nicotinamide Riboside Supplementation in Long Covid

The Efficacy and Safety of a Mental Intervention Program vs. Usual Care and Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) vs. Placebo for Improving Health-related Quality of Life in Long Covid: A 2 x 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05703074
Acronym
MINIRICO
Enrollment
310
Registered
2023-01-27
Start date
2023-01-30
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Long COVID

Brief summary

Long COVID, also referred to as post-acute sequela of COVID-19 (PASC), is present in a substantial number of individuals, and treatment for this is warranted. Two different hypothetical models of Long COVID suggest attenuated mitochondrial energy production and functional brain alterations associated with psychosocial load, respectively, to be key mechanisms in the underlying pathophysiology. Given the potential importance of metabolic disturbances, dietary supplement by Nicotinamide Riboside (NR, sales name Niagen®) may be beneficial. Given the potential importance of functional brain alterations, a tailored and personalized Mind-Body Reprocessing Therapy (MBRT) may be beneficial. The MBRT consists of 4 to 6 face-to-face therapist encounters in combination with digital resources. The primary objective is to determine whether NR 1000 mg twice daily and/or MBRT increase health-related quality of life in individuals with Long COVID compared with care as usual and/or placebo. The Medical Outcome Study 36-item short form (SF-36), general health subscore is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints are: Markers of inflammation (hsCRP) and cognitive function (trail making test), cost-effectiveness, and the patient-reported symptoms fatigue, dyspnoea, and global impression of change in symptoms, function and quality of life. Explorative objectives encompass intervention effects on additional cognitive function markers, biological markers (indices of inflammation and autonomic nervous activity), disability markers (work attendance) and patient symptoms, as well as the exploration of long-term effects, differential subgroup effects, intervention effect mediators and intervention effect predictors. The study is a randomized controlled trial featuring a 2 x 2 factorial design where MBRT is compared with usual care and NR is compared with placebo. The latter comparison is double blinded. Eligible participants are individuals (18-70 years) with confirmed Long COVID interferring negatively with daily activities. A total of 310 participants will be enrolled. After baseline assessment (T1), the participants will be randomized 1:1 for both treatment comparisons, resulting in four treatment groups: a) MBRT and NR; b) usual care and NR; c) MBRT and placebo; d) usual care and placebo. All treatment periods last for three months, followed by primary endpoint assessment (T2). Total follow-up time is 12 months (T3). A comprehensive investigational program at all time points includes clinical examination, functional testing (spirometry, autonomic cardiovascular control, neurocognitive functions), sampling of biological specimens (blood) and questionnaire charting (background/demographics, clinical symptoms, psychosocial factors, study events).

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNicotinamide Riboside (NR)

4 capsules (a total of 1000 mg) 2 times daily for 84 days

BEHAVIORALMind-body reprocessing therapy (MBRT)

4-6 face-to-face meetings over 3-4 weeks, unlimited access to designated online resources.

BEHAVIORALCare as usual

A brief self-help leaflet on long COVID is distributed, otherwise care as usual by the general practitioner

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

4 capsules (empty) 2 times daily for 84 days.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Akershus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

For the NR vs placebo comparison, participants, care providers, investigators and outcome assessors are blinded. For the MBRT vs. usual care comparison, due to the nature of the intervention, only outcome assessors are blinded

Intervention model description

A 2 x 2 factorial randomized controlled trial, where Mind-Body Reprocessing Therapy (MBRT) is compared with care as usual and Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) is compared with placebo.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergone acute COVID-19, confirmed EITHER by a positive PCR-test OR a positive self-test combined with confirmatory antibody-pattern in blood. * Persistent symptoms at least 6 months following acute COVID-19 without symptom-free interval. * Functional disability to an extent that impacts negatively on normal activities (such as work attendance, physical exercise, social activities, etc.) * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Other chronic illnesses, demanding life situations or concomitant drug use/substance abuse that is considered a plausible cause of persistent symptoms and associated disability * Sustained organ damage (lung, heart, brain) following acute, serious Covid-19 * Pregnancy. * Bedridden * Insufficient command of Norwegian

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related quality of lifeThree months after inclusion (T2)The Medical Outcome Study 36-item short form (SF-36), general health subscore (total range 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate better QoL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Executive functioningThree months after inclusion (T2)The Trail Making test, part B, seconds. Longer time indicates poorer executive functioning
FatigueThree months after inclusion (T2)Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ), total sum score (total range is from 0 - 33; higher scores indicate more fatigue)
InflammationThree months after inclusion (T2)Plasma levels of C-reactive protein, high-sensitive assay (hsCRP). Higher levels indicate more inflammation
Global impression of changeThree months after inclusion (T2)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) inventory. Total range is from 1 - 7; higher scores imply that the health status is considered worsened
Cost-effectivenessThree months after inclusion (T2)Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, using the 36-item short form (SF-36) general health subscore to determine quality-adjusted life years.
DyspnoeaThree months after inclusion (T2)Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale. Total range is from 0 - 4, where higher scores indicate more dyspnoea

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Smell and taste abnormalitiesThree months after inclusion (T2)Averaged score across two singel questionnaire items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale where higher scores means more symptoms
Working memoryThree months after inclusion (T2)The digit span test, total score. Higher scores means better working memory
Inflammation, additional informationThree months after inclusion (T2)Plasma levels of Interleukin (IL)-6. Higher levels means more inflammation.
Subjective cognitive difficultiesThree months after inclusion (T2)Average score across 4 single items adressing subjective cognitive complaints, each scored on a 1-5 Likert scale. Higher scores means more subjective cognitive difficulties.
Physical functioningThree months after inclusion (T2)The Medical Outcome Study 36-item short form (SF-36), physical functioning subscore (total range 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate better physical functioning)
Social functioningThree months after inclusion (T2)The Medical Outcome Study 36-item short form (SF-36), social functioning subscore (total range 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate better social functioning)
AnxietyThree months after inclusion (T2)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Symptoms (HADS), anxiety sub-score
Worrying tendenciesThree months after inclusion (T2)Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), total sum score (higher scores means more worrying)
Sympathetic predominanceThree months after inclusion (T2)Heart rate variability (HRV) indices in the time and frequency domain using a 5-minute ECG recording obtained during supine rest
Post-exertional malaise (PEM)Three months after inclusion (T2)PEM items from the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire, total average score across five items
Subjective pain experiencesThree months after inclusion (T2)Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), average score
Sleep difficultiesThree months after inclusion (T2)Karolinska sleep questionnaire (KSQ), total sum score
DepressionThree months after inclusion (T2)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Symptoms (HADS), depression sub-score

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026