Acute Coronary Syndrome, Lipid Disorder, Coronary Artery Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Acute coronary syndrome, Antiplatelet therapy, Statin, Lipids, Drug eluting stent
Brief summary
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a major contributor to mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. Effective therapies are widely available; however, adherence is low. This contributes to worse patient outcomes and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The once-daily polypill leverages a population-based strategy that has previously demonstrated efficacy in improving adherence and access to therapy in low-resource settings, making it an innovative approach for improving post-ACS care. This study aims to investigate the utility of a polypill-based strategy for patients with ACS with drug eluting stent (DES) placement. The polypill will consist of a high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 40 mg daily), aspirin 81 mg daily, and either clopidogrel 75 mg or prasugrel 10 mg daily.
Detailed description
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a large contributor to patient morbidity and mortality and healthcare costs. Patients with suspected ACS are referred for diagnostic coronary angiography, and if obstructive coronary disease is found, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluding stent (DES) has been proven to reduce mortality and reduce recurrent myocardial infarction. Medical therapy for ACS involves treatment with a statin and dual antiplatelet drug therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibition. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a vital aspect of post-PCI care and ensures stent patency. Aspirin blocks metabolism of arachidonic acid and production of thromboxane A2 through irreversible inhibition of cyclooxygenase 1. Prasugrel and clopidogrel are irreversible inhibitors of the platelet P2Y12 ADP receptors, while ticagrelor is a reversible inhibitor of the platelet P2Y12 ADP receptor. Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 1 month and ideally up to 1 year for patients treated medically, and at least 1 year for patients treated with DES after hospitalization for ACS. Additionally, lipid lowering therapy is a cornerstone of post-ACS care. Multiple studies have demonstrated a direct correlation between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and ASCVD risk. Statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylgultaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) are first-line therapies used to achieve LDL-C reductions. High-intensity statins, such as atorvastatin 40 mg or 80 mg or rosuvastatin 20 mg or 40 mg, can lower LDL-C by \> 50%, and patients with history of ACS have greater benefit from high-intensity statins versus low-intensity statins. Importantly, administration of a high-intensity statin is a Class 1 recommendation from the AHA/ACC Non-ST-Elevation ACS guidelines and the ST-Elevation ACS guidelines. The combination of prompt diagnosis of ACS, management with coronary angiography with possible DES placement, and medical therapy including DAPT has led to improvements in ACS mortality. However, nonadherence to cardiovascular medications is common. Data from the US Veteran's Affair's hospitals show that nearly 30% of patients did not refill clopidogrel after index hospitalization for ACS. In a study of the PREMIER registry, one in seven patients stopped taking clopidogrel therapy after 1 month, and those who stopped had ninefold elevated risk of death within 1 year. Poor adherence to antiplatelet therapy with either aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors can lead to in-stent thrombosis, a particularly morbid occurrence characterized by high patient morbidity and mortality. Early stoppage of dual antiplatelet therapy increases risk of stent thrombosis 90-fold. Nonadherence to statins is also well documented. Roughly 1/3 of ischemic heart disease is related to dyslipidemia, and statins are the mainstay of treatment. However, roughly 25-50% of patients discontinue their statin therapy within the first year after treatment initiation. Lipid reduction is a proven strategy to prevent further cardiovascular events, however, medication nonadherence is a significant barrier. The polypill is a potential strategy for increasing utilization of proven ACS therapies. The polypill refers to a fixed-dose combination of once-daily medication with proven benefits. The feasibility of a polypill-based strategy has been demonstrated for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events. Among patients with hypertension at a federally qualified community health center, the polypill led to a reduction in systolic blood pressure (-7 mm Hg, 95% CI: -2 to -12; p=0.003) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-11 mg/dl, 95% CI: -5 to -18; p=0.0003). Multi-drug combinations have additionally been employed in the Indian Polycap Study, HOPE-3 trial, UMPIRE trial and most recently in the PolyIran study, which demonstrated high rates of adherence, and low rates of adverse events.13-16 In PolyIran, the largest of these studies, more than 6500 healthy individuals were enrolled and randomized to treatment with a polypill containing low doses of a thiazide diuretic, aspirin, statin, and ACE/ARB versus no pharmacologic intervention for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Among those receiving the polypill, a 34% risk reduction in major cardiovascular events was observed compared to standard treatment. In the smaller UMPIRE trial, moreover, adherence among participants receiving a polypill formulation was more than three-fold higher than in those receiving usual care. Few studies have enrolled disadvantaged U.S populations to date and no study to our knowledge has evaluated a polypill strategy for treatment of heart failure, where pill burden and adherence continue to present obstacles to improving care. No randomized trial has evaluated a polypill strategy for the treatment of ACS. Given the significant pill burden and challenges with adherence, a polypill strategy may have substantial advantages. Thus, we have planned a single-center, open-label, pragmatic pilot study of a polypill-based strategy for the treatment of ACS. The polypill will consist of a high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 40 mg daily), aspirin 81 mg daily, and clopidogrel 75 mg or prasugrel 10 mg daily. The rationale for the trial is summarized as follows: * Acute coronary syndromes represent a major contributor to mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs * Effective therapies are widely available; however, adherence is low. This contributes to worse patient outcomes and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. * The once-daily polypill leverages a population-based strategy that has previously demonstrated efficacy in improving adherence and access to therapy in low-resource settings, making it an innovative approach for improving post-ACS care.
Interventions
Polypill formulation consisting of rosuvastatin, aspirin, and prasugrel or consisting of rosuvastatin, aspirin, and clopidogrel.
Typical prescriptions for post-acute coronary syndrome care including statin, aspirin, and prasugrel or clopidogrel.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1\. Patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent placement.
Exclusion criteria
1. Age \< 18 2. Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 as measured by the simplified MDRD formula 3. Current need for inotropes or with cardiac index \< 2.2 L/min/m2 4. Current need for systemic anticoagulation 5. Contraindication to receive any components of the polypill 6. History of allergic reaction or intolerance to aspirin, prasugrel or clopidogrel, or rosuvastatin 7. Comorbidities that might be expected to limit lifespan within the 1-month study period 8. Inability to provide written informed consent 9. Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Low Density Lipoprotein - Cholesterol | 1 month | Within group change and between-group difference, polypill vs usual care. Represented as least squares means from linear regression models adjusting for baseline values, comparing polypill strategy versus usual care. The two relevant time points included baseline and 1 month laboratory values. |
| Platelet Reactivity | 1 month | Within-group change and between-group changes in platelet reactivity at 30 days. Platelet reactivity was assessed using impedance aggregometry (Ohms, Ω, lower = better platelet inhibition). The two relevant time points included baseline and 1 month laboratory values. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adherence by Self-report | 1 month | Within group and between group difference in Morisky Medication Adherence Scale - 8, a self-reported adherence questionnaire that ranges from 0-8, where 8 = highest adherence, and 0 = lowest adherence. The two relevant time points included baseline and 1 month values. |
| Treatment Satisfaction | 1 month | Within group and between group change in treatment satisfaction by Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine. The score ranges from 0-100, with 100 indicating highest satisfaction, and 0 indicating lowest satisfaction. The two relevant time points included baseline and 1 month values. |
| Quality of Life at 1 Month | 1 month | Within group and between group difference in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, which ranges from 0-100. 100 indicates best quality of life, 0 indicates worst quality of life. The two relevant time points included baseline and 1 month laboratory values. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
All enrolled participants were randomized.
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 55 years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 88 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 52 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| P2Y12 Inhibitor at randomization Clopidogrel | 54 Participants |
| P2Y12 Inhibitor at randomization Prasugrel | 86 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 114 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 41 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 51 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 69 | 0 / 71 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 69 | 1 / 71 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 8 / 69 | 8 / 71 |