Skip to content

A Study of Olezarsen (Formerly Known as AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx) in Adults With Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Established or at Increased Risk for), and/or With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Study of ISIS 678354 in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Established or at Increased Risk for), and/or With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05355402
Enrollment
154
Registered
2022-05-02
Start date
2022-05-09
Completion date
2023-12-21
Last updated
2026-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, Hypertriglyceridemia, Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

Brief summary

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of olezarsen on percent change in fasting triglyceride (TG) levels compared to placebo at Months 6 and 12 and the proportion of participants who achieve different thresholds in fasting TG. Other objectives were to evaluate the effect of olezarsen on percent change in fasting apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), remnant cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), apolipoprotein B (apoB), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoprotein A-1 (apoA-1).

Detailed description

This was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides \> 150 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) and established or at increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and/or with severe hypertriglyceridemia. The study had an up to 8-week screening period, a 53-week treatment period, and a 13-week post-treatment follow-up period.

Interventions

SC injection.

DRUGPlacebo

SC injection.

Sponsors

Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged ≥ 18 years at the time of informed consent 2. Fall into at least 1 of the following groups (a or b): 1. Hypertriglyceridemia with fasting TG ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.69 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) and \< 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) with either clinical diagnosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at increased risk for ASCVD 2. Severe hypertriglyceridemia with fasting TG ≥ 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L). 3. Participants must be on standard-of-care (SOC), lipid-lowering medications per local guidelines. 4. Participants must be willing to comply with diet and lifestyle recommendations as able.

Exclusion criteria

1. Diabetes with any of the following: 1. Newly diagnosed within 12 weeks of screening 2. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) ≥ 9.5% at Screening 3. Change in basal insulin regimen \> 20% within 3 months prior to Screening 4. For participants with type 1 diabetes: episode of diabetic ketoacidosis, or ≥ 3 episodes of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to Screening 2. Acute coronary syndrome or stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to Screening 3. Major surgery, peripheral revascularization, or non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 3 months prior to Screening, or upcoming planned major surgery or major procedure (e.g., arterial revascularization) during the course of the study 4. Active pancreatitis within 4 weeks prior to Screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the jump to reference (J2R) approach.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <150 mg/dL (1.69 Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at Month 6 With Baseline TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <150 mg/dL (1.69 mmol/L) at Month 12 With Baseline TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoC-III at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline Fasting Remnant Cholesterol (Remnant-C) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Remnant-C at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoB at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoA-1 at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Total-C at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) With Baseline TG ≥500 mg/dL at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) With Baseline TG ≥500 mg/dL at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis EventsUp to 12 monthsAll adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the Acute Pancreatitis Adjudication Committee (PAC) Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Number of participants with adjudicated acute pancreatitis events were reported.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Events (≥2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment)Up to 12 monthsThe adjudicated acute pancreatitis event rates were compared between pooled olezarsen treatment and placebo group using a negative binomial regression model or Poisson regression model with the treatment group and natural log transformed baseline fasting TG as the factors, and number of adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior to enrollment as a covariate. The logarithm of time in year that each participant observed during the treatment period were used as an offset variable. Number of participants with adjudicated acute pancreatitis events with ≥2 events in 5 years prior to enrollment were reported.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part at 28 clinical sites including 21 sites in the United States (US) and 7 sites in Canada from 01 June 2022 to 17 January 2023.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 154 participants were enrolled in the study. All Participants were randomized in 1:1 ratio in two cohorts to receive either 50 mg, or 80 mg, and each cohort was further randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive olezarsen or olezarsen-matching placebo.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15
Fasting Triglycerides (TG)302.1 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 201.91
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
140 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 391 / 580 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 3932 / 5824 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 396 / 588 / 57

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026