Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of LYR-210 for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Adults (ENLIGHTEN 2)

ENLIGHTEN 2: A Phase III, Randomized, Blinded, Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LYR-210 for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05295459
Enrollment
182
Registered
2022-03-25
Start date
2022-05-13
Completion date
2025-04-02
Last updated
2026-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Sinusitis, Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)

Brief summary

Multicenter, phase III, randomized, blinded, controlled, parallel group.

Detailed description

This is a 24-week, multicenter, phase III, randomized, blinded, controlled, parallel group with a 24-week treatment period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LYR-210 compared with sham control for treatment in adults with CRS.

Interventions

LYR-210 drug matrix (mometasone furoate)

Sham procedure control

Daily Saline Irrigation

Sponsors

Lyra Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 * Diagnosed as having CRS * Bilateral ethmoid disease confirmed on CT * Mean 3 cardinal symptom (3CS) score * Undergone at least 2 trials of medical treatments in the past * Has been informed of the nature of the study and provided written informed consent * Agrees to comply with all study requirements * If currently on a waiting list for sinonasal surgery, willing to be removed from the waiting list or have preplanned surgery date cancelled for the duration of the study. \[Note: this does not preclude a participant from receiving or being recommended for sinonasal surgery as rescue treatment during the study\].

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to tolerate topical anesthesia * Previous nasal surgery * Presence of nasal polyp grade 2 or higher * Seasonal allergic rhinitis * Perennial rhinitis with symptoms that are well controlled by regular use of intranasal corticosteroids * Severe asthma * History or clinical evidence or suspicion of invasive fungal sinusitis, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, atrophic rhinitis, or odontogenic sinusitis * Obstruction preventing proper placement and retention of LYR-210 as seen on endoscopy * Anatomic variation that, in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely impact placement of LYR-210 as seen on CT * Known history of hypersensitivity or intolerance to corticosteroids * Known history of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axial dysfunction * Previous pituitary or adrenal surgery * Dental procedure/implant on maxillary dentition within 4 weeks of the Screening visit. * Past or present acute or chronic intracranial or orbital complications of CRS * History or diagnosis (in either eye) of glaucoma or ocular hypertension * Past or present functional vision in only 1 eye * Past, present, or planned organ transplant or chemotherapy with immunosuppression * Currently positive for COVID-19 or residual sinonasal symptoms from a previous COVID-19 infection * Pregnant or breast feeding. Females of child-bearing potential must test negative for pregnancy at the time of screening * Evidence of disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments * Currently participating in an investigational drug or device study * Determined by the investigator as not suitable to be enrolled

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (CFBL) in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3 Cardinal Symptoms (3CS) in Participants Without Nasal PolypsWeek 24The 3CS are nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion, anterior/posterior nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure. The diary is completed daily by study participants throughout the study. Each symptom is rated on a 4-point (0-3) scale where 0= none/absent symptoms, 1=mild symptoms, 2=moderate symptoms, and 3=severe symptoms. The composite score of 3CS is the sum of the three cardinal symptom scores. The 3CS total score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CFBL in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3CS in All Participants at Week 24Week 24The 3CS are nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion, anterior/posterior nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure. The diary is completed daily by study participants throughout the study. Each symptom is rated on a 4-point (0-3) scale where 0= none/absent symptoms, 1=mild symptoms, 2=moderate symptoms, and 3=severe symptoms. The composite score of 3CS is the sum of the three cardinal symptom scores. The 3CS total score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
CFBL in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score at Week 24Week 24The SNOT-22 questionnaire is a 22-item disease-specific quality of life instrument. Each symptom is scored on a 6-point scale where 0 = no problem and 5 = problem as bad as it can be. The total SNOT-22 score is the sum of the 22 items and can range from 0 to 110 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
CFBL in the 3-D Volumetric CT Score at Week 20Week 20Change from baseline in the percent opacification of the bilateral anterior and posterior ethmoids at Week 20, as determined by 3-D volumetric CT analysis. 3-D volumetric scoring involves evaluations of each slice of 3-D coronal CT sequences and summing of all the slices to create a volumetric score ranging from 0% to 100%. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement from Baseline.
Rescue Treatment Requirement Through Week 24Week 24Number and percent of participants requiring rescue treatment (systemic corticosteroid for any reason or participants that were recommended/underwent sinonasal surgery) through Week 24.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Week 24 Treatment Period: 2:1 (LYR-210 to Sham) Randomization

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
146 Participants
Age, Continuous50 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.65
Baseline 3CS Score6.46 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.337
Baseline SNOT-22 Total Score56.2 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.38
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
57 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
145 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1120 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 11217 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1120 / 60

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026