Heart Rate, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
Conditions
Keywords
coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), Target Heart rate
Brief summary
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is one of important non-invasive test for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Cardiac motion artifact by heart rate (HR) has impact on CCTA interpretation. Current recommendation suggests HR reduction at less than 60 bpm with using of oral metoprolol. However, there are populations that are contraindicated for beta blockers. There were scantly data of calcium channel blocker and ivabradine. Moreover, there is no data comparing these 3 drug groups within single trial This double-blinded randomized controlled trial compares oral metoprolol immediate release, diltiazem immediate release and ivabradine with primary endpoint of patients' percentage to achieve target HR lower than 60 bpm prior to CCTA.
Detailed description
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is one of important non-invasive test for diagnosis coronary artery disease. Information of CCTA can provide information such as coronary artery lumen, vessel wall, degree of stenosis and component of coronary arterial plaque. Most of studies in CCTA represent high negative predictive value (NPV) approximately 93-100 %.However, motion artifact has impact on CCTA interpretation, especially when heart rate (HR) at more than 70 beat-per-minute (bpm). Therefore, HR reduction maneuver is necessary for CCTA. Current recommendation suggests HR reduction at \< 60 bpm for best quality of CCTA imaging and to minimized duration of exposure to radiation using either beta blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. According to North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI) recommendation in 2016, oral beta blocker prior to CCTA in patient with HR \> 60 bpm is the preferred intervention. The recommended oral beta blocker usually is metoprolol 50-100 mg 1 hour prior to CCTA. The dosage of metoprolol must not exceed 400 mg/day. However, there are populations that are contraindicated or need to avoid beta blockers, such as uncontrolled obstructive airway disease, patient with baseline SBP \< 100 mmHg, etc. Also, data in many clinical trials suggested that even high dose beta blockers can't controlled HR to target prior to CCTA in some patients. These pieces of information lead to alternative drugs to control HR prior to CCTA. In previous clinical trials, the effective of non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers to control HR prior to CCTA compare to beta blockers had unclear results. In one study, Intravenous (IV) diltiazem is as effective in HR lowering to target to less than 60 bpm as IV metoprolol. Another study expressed inferior result of oral verapamil 1 hour before CCTA compared to oral metoprolol. However, there was heterogeneity in population of metoprolol and verapamil groups. According to FDA, immediate release (IR) diltiazem has onset of action faster than verapamil IR at 30 & 60-120 min., respectively. Initial dose of diltiazem in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease and supraventricular tachycardia is at 30 - 60 mg oral every 6 hour and not exceed 360 mg/day. Another agent that started to gain more evidence in HR control is ivabradine. Ivabradine has high selective and inhibitive property to If current channel which related to sinus node pace maker activity. Thus, other ion current channel normally doesn't get involved and doesn't have direct other cardiovascular effect. From meta-analysis, patients received ivabradine significantly achieving target HR to at least 65 bpm more than beta blockers group prior to CCTA (OR 5.02; 95% CI 3.16- 7.98, p \< 0.00001, I 2 = 20%). In current recommendation, dosage of ivabradine shouldn't exceed 15 mg per day in patients with heart failure and chronic stable coronary artery disease. However, ivabradine has contraindication in patient with atrial fibrillation and/or sinus node disease, which require other agent to achieve target HR prior to CCTA. In current situation, there is no clinical trial to compare effect of beta blocker, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker and Ivabradine in HR reduction to achieve target prior to CCTA. The aim of this study is to compare percentage of patients achieving target HR \< 60 bpm medication prior to CCTA by using oral beta blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker and ivabradine for HR lowering. Our study is double-blinded randomized controlled trial using Metoprolol immediate release as representative of beta blockers for controlled group, Diltiazem immediate release as representative of non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker and ivabradine. We blinded both investigators and patients using encapsulated drugs distribute from Siriraj's dispensary and randomly assign to our patients. The secondary objective of this study is to compare side effects, time to achieve target HR & CCTA image quality using 5 point grade scale and modified 15-segment American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (AHA) between oral Metoprolol immediate, Diltiazem immediate release and ivabradine.
Interventions
Prescribe oral metoprolol tartrate according to doses and time duration until patient reach targeted HR of less than 60 bpm or maximize dose according to each drug protocols prior to CCTA.
DRUGIvabradine
Prescribe oral ivabradine according to doses and time duration until patient reach targeted HR of less than 60 bpm or maximize dose according to each drug protocols prior to CCTA.
DRUGDiltiazem
Prescribe oral diltiazem immediate-release according to doses and time duration until patient reach targeted HR of less than 60 bpm or maximize dose according to each drug protocols prior to CCTA.
Sponsors
Mahidol University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Masking description
We blinded both investigators and patients using encapsulated drugs distribute from Siriraj's dispensary and randomly assign to our patients. These encapsulated drugs then were sealed from humidity and kept at temperature below 25 degree celsius . These drugs will not be kept for more than 1 week after encapsulated. These encapsulated were assigned according to serial number generate from nQuery program by pharmacist Siriraj's dispensary. In each package, the number from first to fourth encapsulated drugs were assigned from Siriraj's dispensary in order to prescribe to patient when HR can not reach target prior to CCTA.
Intervention model description
1. Extract patients who undergo routine Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CCTA) with heart rate (HR) \> 60 bpm at rest 2. Enroll patients using Inform consent from the first date of study period until reach the required sample size 3. Randomize patients to 1:1:1 using 6 block randomization by nQuery program 4. Assign sequential encapsulated drugs distribute from Siriraj's dispensary to patients according to randomization and protocol prior to CCTA. 5. Assigned encapsulated until patient reaches target HR or until full dose according to each drugs protocol prior to CCTA. 6. Continuous monitor blood pressure and heart rate every 15 minutes and closed observe side effects and complication until at least 1 hr after finish CCTA. 7. Review medical record and CCTA results, then fill in case record forms.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age of at least 18 year-old 2. Received Coronary CT angiography at Siriraj Hospital to evaluate diagnosis of coronary artery disease or risk stratification of coronary artery disease 3. Normal sinus rhythm with baseline HR \> 60 bpm which cardiac imaging specialist suggest using HR lowering intervention
Exclusion criteria
1. Atrial fibrillation 2. Previous pacemaker implantation 3. II- and III-degree atrio-ventricular-block 4. NHYA class III - IV 5. Documented LVEF \< 40% 6. Contraindication for CCTA: Impaired renal function (serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dl), known allergy to iodinated contrast media, pregnancy, thyroid disease 7. Blood pressure \< 100/70 mmHg 8. Uncontrolled asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (defined as GOLD stage D) and/or uncontrolled reactive airway disease 9. Current medication which cause severe interaction with calcium channel blocker, beta blocker and/or Ivabradine 10. Known allergy to calcium channel blocker, beta blocker and/or Ivabradine
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of patient achieving target heart rate (HR) | 3 hours | To compare percentage of patient in achieving adequate HR control (defined as target HR of 60 bpm) among oral Ivabradine, metoprolol and diltiazem during CCTA |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Side effects | 3 hours | To compare side effects between oral Ivabradine, metoprolol and diltiazem during CCTA |
| Time to achieve target HR | 3 hours | To compare time to achieve target HR of less than 60 bpm |
| Image quality | 1 week | To compare image quality using 5 point grade scale and modified 15-segment American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (AHA) |
Countries
Thailand
Contacts
Primary ContactPrichapol Thantassanee, M.D.
Backup ContactThananya Boonyasirinant, M.D.
Outcome results
None listed