Skip to content

Hypo Versus Conventional Fractionation in Reconstructed-Breast Cancer Mastectomy Patients

A Randomized Phase III Trial of Hypofractionated Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Reconstruction After Mastectomy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05253170
Enrollment
622
Registered
2022-02-23
Start date
2022-04-01
Completion date
2032-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Radiotherapy; Complications

Keywords

Mastectomy, Reconstruction, Radiation therapy, Conventional fractionation, Hypofractionation, Complication

Brief summary

This randomized Phase III study aims to show major complication rate of hypofractionation radiation therapy is not inferior, compared to conventional fractionation radiation therapy in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction surgery.

Detailed description

This study is a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial. For breast cancer patients who underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy, the hypofractionation radiotherapy group (experimental group) and the conventional fractionation radiotherapy group (control group) were divided 1:1 and compared to reveal the non-inferiority with hypofractionation in terms of major complication rate. I. Primary Objective * To show the non-inferiority of major complication rate in reconstructed-breast between the hypofractionation radiotherapy group (experimental group) and the conventional fractionation radiotherapy group (control group) at 2 years after radiation therapy. * The main complications are defined at those requiring hospitalization or surgery among complications. II. Secondary Objective: * Comparison of other side effects between the two groups. * Comparison of complication rate stratified by reconstruction timing and type of reconstruction * Immediate implant-based reconstruction * Immediate autologous reconstruction * Delayed-immediate implant reconstruction (2-stage) * Comparison of quality of life between the two groups. * Comparison of local and regional control rates between the two groups. III. Tertiary Objective: * Comparison of cosmetic evaluations between the two groups. * Dosimetry analysis for correlation between the occurrence of complications and the dose profile.

Interventions

Radiation regimen of 2.5-3.0Gy x 13-17 fractions +/- sequential boost 0-7 fractions

Radiation regimen of 1.8-2.0Gy x 23-28 fractions +/- sequential boost 0-5 fractions

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
19 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female patient who underwent mastectomy for invasive breast cancer * Patients who have undergone breast reconstruction after mastectomy or who have inserted a tissue expander * (y)p patients with stage IIIA or lower (excluding T4 and N3 patients) who need adjuvant radiation therapy * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance ≤ 2 * Age ≥ 19 years * Patients who agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who already had implants at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer or who have already undergone reconstructive surgery * Patients who underwent reconstruction after partial resection or breast conserving surgery rather than mastectomy * Patients who are using or planning to use an air expander * Patients receiving radiation therapy for salvage or palliative purposes * Patients with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis * Patients who are scheduled to undergo concurrent chemoradiation therapy * Patients with bilateral breast cancer * Male breast cancer patients * Patients who have previously received radiation therapy for the ipsilateral breast or supraclavicular area * Patients with history of cancers other than thyroid cancer, intraepithelial cancer of the cervix, or skin cancer * Patients diagnosed with ductal breast carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, phyllodes, metaplastic cancer, or other benign tumors based on histological diagnosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Complication RateUp to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapy* Unplanned re-hospitalization or re-operation for intervention * Implant removal due to infection, autologous flap total failure (reconstruction failure)
Capsular Contracture (If implant-based recontruction is performed)Up to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapy• Baker Scale * G1: the breast is normally soft and appears natural in size and shape * G2: the breast is a little firm, but appears normal * G3: the breast is firm and appears abnormal * G4: the breast is hard, painful to the touch, and appears abnormal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound infectionUp to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapyNIH-NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Ver.5.0 * G1: Localized, local intervention indicate * G2: Oral intervention indicated (e.g., antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral) * G3: IV antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral intervention indicated; invasive intervention indicated * G4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated * G5: Death
SeromaUp to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapyNIH-NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Ver.5.0 * G1: Asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated * G2: Symptomatic; simple aspiration indicated * G3: Symptomatic, elective invasive intervention indicated
Wound DehiscenceUp to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapyNIH-NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Ver.5.0 * G1: Incisional separation, intervention not indicated * G2: Incisional separation, local care (e.g., suturing) or medical intervention indicated (e.g., analgesic) * G3: Fascial disruption or dehiscence without evisceration; revision by operative intervention indicated * G4: Life-threatening consequences; symptomatic hernia with evidence of strangulation; fascial disruption with evisceration; major reconstruction flap, grafting, resection, or amputation indicated * G5: Death
HematomaUp to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapyNIH-NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Ver.5.0 * G1: Mild symptoms; intervention not indicated * G2: Minimally invasive evacuation or aspiration indicated * G3: Transfusion; invasive intervention indicated * G4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated * G5: Death

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arm Lymphedema [Optional]Up to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapyIn each follow-up time, arm circumference is measured at 10 cm above the ipsilateral and contralateral anterior cubital fossa. Lymphedema is considered to be occurred if a difference of ≥10% between two measures.
Cosmetic Outcome [Optional]Up to 2 years after the completion of radiation therapySkin 3D reconstruction was performed based on the radiation therapy plan CT and breast CT at 24 months after radiotherapy. Using in-house software based on deep learning algorithm, cosmetic scores are produced and compared between groups.

Contacts

Primary ContactIn Ah Kim, MD. PhD.
inah228@snu.ac.kr31-787-7651

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026