Skip to content

PROton Versus Photon Therapy for Esophageal Cancer - a Trimodality Strategy

PROton Versus Photon Therapy for Esophageal Cancer - a Trimodality Strategy (PROTECT) a Multicenter International Randomized Phase III Study of Neoadjuvant Proton Versus Photon Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05055648
Acronym
PROTECT
Enrollment
396
Registered
2021-09-24
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2032-12-01
Last updated
2024-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer, Radiotherapy, Side Effect, Proton Therapy

Brief summary

The PROTECT trial will test the hypothesis that proton (PT) -enabled radiation dose reductions to sensitive, normal tissues will result in lower rates of treatment-related pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer compared to standard photon therapy (XT).

Detailed description

PROTECT is a unblinded international multicenter randomized phase III study for patients with operable EC or EGC receiving nCXT (standard of care) or nCPT (intervention). The study will be open-label for the patient and the treating physician. The radiation dose is either 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions, five fractions per week or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, five fractions per week. Prior to trial opening, each proton center will determine a single dose regimen for all patients treated in that specific proton center and its assigned photon centers. The protocol prescribes that all referring centers will use the same chemotherapy regimen, which is weekly carboplatin (AUC 2), and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2), five cycles, irrespective of choice of dose regimen. Chemotherapy is a non-investigational drug. Prior to referral to any proton therapy center, patients will be randomed (1:1) to either nCXT or nCPT. Only patients randomized to the PT arm will be referred to a PT center. Randomization will be performed centrally using an online 24-hour web-based system maintained by the Clinical Trial Office at Aarhus University Hospital, ensuring allocation concealment to the clinical investigators. The method of randomization will be stratified permuted blocks of size 4 and 6 (selected randomly) with the following strata: * Histopathology (non-squamous vs squamous cell carcinoma) * Planned surgical technique (open versus minimal invasive/robotic or hybrid) * Proton center and sites assigned to this center (which will deliver the nCXT)

Interventions

nCXT consists of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel for 5 weeks, following the CROSS trial. The radiation dose will be either 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions

nCPT consists of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel for 5 weeks, following the CROSS trial. The radiation dose will be either 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions

Sponsors

University of Leeds
CollaboratorOTHER
KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
University College, London
CollaboratorOTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Technische Universität Dresden
CollaboratorOTHER
Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen
CollaboratorOTHER
CNAO National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy
CollaboratorOTHER
Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Leon Berard
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut Curie
CollaboratorOTHER
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
CollaboratorOTHER
University College London Hospitals
CollaboratorOTHER
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Paul Scherrer Institut, Center for Proton Therapy
CollaboratorOTHER
HollandPTC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
IBA worldwide
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Varian- A Siemens Healthineer Company
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

open-label, non-blinded, international multicenter, randomized phase III study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with histologically verified squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (including signet cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma, not further specified) of the esophagus (E) or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ). * FDG PET/CT performed. * Tumor stage according to TNM (8th edition): cT1-4a and/or cN+, cM0. * Age ≥18 years. * Performance status WHO ≤2. * Adequate laboratory findings: hematological: hemoglobin \> 90 g/L, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,5 x 109/L, platelets ≥ 75 x 109/L hepatic: bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALAT ≤ 3 x ULN renal: creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN, GFR (may be calculated) \> 30 ml/min * MDT decision on suitability to undergo curatively intended nCXT or nCPT followed by surgery. * Planned transthoracic esophagectomy or gastrectomy being open, minimally invasive of combination of both. * Ability to adhere to procedures for study and follow-up. * Patients with low risk cancers with a life expectancy above 5 years (e.g. low risk prostate cancer) are allowed in the study. Adequately treated diagnoses such as cervix uteri carcinoma in situ, in situ urothelial carcinoma or localized non-melanoma skin cancer are allowed, regardless of time of diagnosis. * Patients of childbearing potential: pregnancy prevention according to the standards of each country. Patients of childbearing potential must present a negative pregnancy test. Patients and their partners must use effective contraception. Patients of childbearing potential included in the study must use oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, depot injection of progestin subdermal implantation, a hormonal vaginal ring, or transdermal patch during the study treatment and one month after.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet one or more of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulmonary complicationsfrom randomization until 90 days after surgeryIncidence of pulmonary complications during and following nCPT or nCXT and surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complicationsfrom surgery until 90 days after surgeryPredefined items scored by Clavien-Dindo and Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI)
Patient-reported outcome measuresup to 5 yearsEORTC quality of life questionnaire
Compliance with trimodality treatment3 monthsThe proportion of patients complying with trimodality treatment in each arm
Pathological responseimmediately after surgerytumor regression grade for the primary tumor scored according to Mandard score.
Cumulative incidence of loco-regional failurefrom date of randomization up to 5 yearsLocoregional failure evaluated according to RECIST with all failures within the irradiated volume counting as events.
Pattern of failureup to 5 yearsFirst site of failure will be divided in loco-regional lymph node failures, loco-regional failures in anastomosis, and distant extra-cranial and intra-cranial failures. All loco-regional failures will be divided in failures inside and outside the treatment volume, which is defined to be within the specified treatment dose.
Disease-free survival (DFS)up to 5 yearsDisease control evaluated according to RECIST with any recurrence (locoregional or distant) as well as death from any cause, whatever occurs first, will be considered as events.
Overall survival (OS)up to 5 yearsDeath from all causes will considered as events
Early toxicityfrom start of nCPT or nCXT until surgeryPredefined items ≥ grade 2 scored by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0
Late toxicityup to 5 yearsPredefined items ≥ grade 2 scored by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0
Major cardiovascular events (MACE)up to 5 yearsPredefined cardiovascular events scored by MACE

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood biomarkers as predictors for treatment failureup to 5 yearscirculating tumor DNA
Proportion of patients receiving adjuvant immunotherapyup to 5 yearsThe actual number of patients starting adjuvant immunotherapy will be recorded
Cost-effectiveness of proton therapy relative to photon therapyup to 5 yearsIncremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs), cost per QALY gained, cost per complication avoided, and cost per total toxicity burden avoided will be reported.
FDG/PET CT as predictors for treatment failure12 monthsCorrelation between diagnostic PET, planning PET-CT and PET at 12 months
Concordance of observed cardiac complications with predictedUp to 5 yearsComparison of observed and predicted toxicity rates
Total toxicity burden (TTB)from randomization until 90 days after surgeryThe combined toxicity scale TTB used in the trial by Lin et al (Lin 2020)
Concordance of observed pulmonary complications with predicted complications from NTCP modelsup to 5 yearsComparison of observed and predicted toxicity rates

Countries

Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactDorte Winter
dorte.skriver.winther@auh.rm.dk+45 78456442
Backup ContactToke Hansen, PhD
tokeha@rm.dk+45 78456442

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026