Skip to content

Consolidation Versus Induction Chemotherapy in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy of Rectal Cancer With High Risk for Recurrence

Induction Versus Consolidation Chemotherapy in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence (ICONA Study)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05054959
Acronym
ICONA
Enrollment
62
Registered
2021-09-23
Start date
2021-06-24
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Keywords

rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy, induction chemotherapy, consolidation chemotherapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to identify the most promising treatment sequence in total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer with a high risk of recurrence.

Detailed description

International recommendations for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with a high risk of disease recurrence are inconsistent regarding the optimal sequence of total neoadjuvant therapy. In a German randomized study, a higher rate of pathological complete response was observed with consolidation chemotherapy. This study compares induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and high-risk features for recurrence.

Interventions

DRUGConsolidation CAPOX Chemotherapy

Six cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy are administered after chemoradiotherapy. CAPOX consists of capecitabine and oxaliplatin according to the study protocol.

DRUGInduction CAPOX Chemotherapy

Four cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy are administered before chemoradiotherapy, followed by two cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy. CAPOX consists of capecitabine and oxaliplatin according to the study protocol.

Sponsors

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are randomized to one of two treatment sequences of total neoadjuvant therapy: induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma * no distant metastases on CT scan (M0 disease) * at least one high risk factor for disease recurrence identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): * T4 tumor (cT4) * N2 disease (cN2) * extramural venous invasion (cEMVI+) * positive lateral lymph nodes * distance of tumor to mesorectal fascia or positive lymph nodes is 1 mm or less (cMRF+) * capacity for informed consent * willingness to attend regular check-ups during and after treatment

Exclusion criteria

history of previous irradiation in the pelvic area * absolute contraindications for MR imaging * distant metastases cannot be reliably excluded * synchronous cancer * chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
complete remission rate2 weeks after completion of TNTThe proportion of complete responses will be defined as the sum of the proportions of pCR in operated patients and cCR in non-operated patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalafter 3 years of follow-uptime from randomization to death
Survival without recurrence of the diseaseafter 3 years of follow-uptime from the end of treatment (in case of cCR) or from radical surgery to death or recurrence of the disease - whichever comes first.
Disease free survivalafter 3 years of follow-upthe time from the end of treatment (in the case of cCR) or surgery to the recurrence of disease, the onset of new cancer, death from cancer or other causes
local controlafter 3 years of follow-upthe time from the end of the treatment (in the case of cCR) or surgery to local recurrence

Countries

Slovenia

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORVaneja Velenik, PD

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026