Skip to content

Pozelimab and Cemdisiran Combination Treatment in Adult Participants With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Who Have Received Pozelimab Monotherapy

A Randomized, Open-label, Two-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of Pozelimab and Cemdisiran Combination Treatment in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Who Have Received Pozelimab Monotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04811716
Enrollment
24
Registered
2021-03-23
Start date
2021-07-29
Completion date
2023-10-18
Last updated
2025-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Keywords

PNH

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 2 dosing regimens of pozelimab and cemdisiran combination therapy during the open-label treatment period (OLTP) The secondary objectives of the study are: * To evaluate the effect of the combination treatment on the following parameters of intravascular hemolysis: lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) control, breakthrough hemolysis, and inhibition of total complement hemolysis activity (CH50) * To evaluate the effect of the combination treatment on hemoglobin levels * To evaluate the effect of the combination treatment on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements * To evaluate the effect of the combination treatment on clinical outcome assessments (COAs) measuring fatigue and health related quality of life * To assess the concentrations of total pozelimab in serum and total complement component (C) 5 and cemdisiran in plasma * To assess immunogenicity to pozelimab and cemdisiran * To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of pozelimab and cemdisiran in an optional open-label extension period (OLEP) * To assess safety after treatment intensification with pozelimab and cemdisiran

Interventions

DRUGPozelimab

Administered Sub-cutaneous (SC) per protocol

Administered SC per protocol

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1\. Participants with PNH who are receiving treatment with pozelimab monotherapy in the R3918- PNH-1868 study (NCT04162470) Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Documented, positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or equivalent test based on regional recommendations for COVID-19 or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection as defined in the protocol 2. Participants with documented history of liver cirrhosis or participants with liver disease with evidence of currently impaired liver function; or participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) as described in the protocol 3. Significant protocol deviation(s) in the parent study based on the investigator's judgment as described in the protocol 4. Any new condition or worsening of an existing condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the participant unsuitable for enrollment or would jeopardize the safety of the participant 5. Known hypersensitivity to cemdisiran or any component of cemdisiran formulation NOTE: Other protocol-defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Through Week 28Open Label Treatment Period (OLTP)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28OLTP Adequate control of hemolysis is defined as LDH values ≤1.5 × Upper limit of normal (ULN) from baseline (day 1) to week 28
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Week 4 Through Week 28Week 4 through Week 28OLTP
Percentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Day 1 through Week 28OLTP; Adequate control at a visit is defined as having LDH \<=1.5 x ULN at that visit
Percentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28OLTP; Normalization of LDH was defined as LDH ≤1.0 × ULN at each visit
Average LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28OLTP
Average LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Week 4 Through Week 28Week 4 through Week 28OLTP
Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28OLTP Breakthrough hemolysis is defined as an increase in LDH with concomitant signs or symptoms associated with hemolysis: • An increase in LDH occurs when: * LDH ≥2 × ULN if pre-treatment LDH is ≤1.5 × ULN or * LDH ≥2 × ULN after initial achievement of LDH ≤1.5 × ULN if pre-treatment LDH is \>1.5 × ULN Signs or symptoms should correspond to those known to be associated with intravascular hemolysis due to Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) limited to the following: new onset or worsening fatigue, headache, dyspnea, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, scleral icterus, erectile dysfunction, chest pain, confusion, dysphagia, anemia including hemoglobin value significantly lower (ie, ≥2g/dL decrease) compared to patient's known baseline hemoglobin values, and thrombotic event.
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28OLTP Hemoglobin stabilization was defined as participants who did not receive an RBC transfusion and had no decrease in hemoglobin level of ≥2 grams per deciLiter (g/dL).
Change in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP Not requiring a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion as per protocol algorithm
Rate of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP Rate of RBCs transfused is defined as number of events per person-years of treatment. For each participant, the participant-years are the time from first dose date to week 28 (or early terminations visit if subject discontinued the study early) in the OLTP.
Number of Per-Protocol RBC Units Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP
Change in Total Complement Hemolysis Activity Assay (CH50) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP
Change in Fatigue as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP FACIT fatigue is a 13-item scale and for each item 4 is not at all fatigued to 0 very much fatigued. Higher FACIT-Fatigue scores indicate less fatigue (scores range from 0-52). A 5-point change is considered clinically meaningful.
Change in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale (GHS/QoL) on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.
Change in Physical Function (PF) Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28OLTP; EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.
Concentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 28On Week 28OLTP
Concentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 28On Week 28OLTP
Concentrations of Total C5 on Week 28On Week 28OLTP
Number of Participants With Pozelimab Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeUp to Week 52 (OLTP [ Week 0 - Week 28] + OLEP [Week 28 - Week 52])OLTP and OLEP
Number of Participants With Cemdisiran Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeUp to Week 52 (OLTP [ Week 0 - Week 28] + OLEP [Week 28 - Week 52])OLTP and OLEP
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs for Participants Who Received Treatment IntensificationThrough Week 28OLTP No participants received dose intensification during the study; Therefore, assessment of the safety of pozelimab + cemdisiran combination therapy in participants requiring dose intensification was not conducted.
Change of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eOptional Open-Label Extension Period (OLEP)
Percent Change of LDH From OLEP Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eOLEP; Percentage of change for units per liter (U/L)
Change of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP
Percent Change of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 24eOLEP
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 52eOLEP
Percentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 52eOLEP Adequate control at a visit is defined as having LDH \<=1.5 x ULN at that visit
Percentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) through week 52eOLEP
Average LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLEP Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 52eOLEP
Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 24eOLEP
Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 52eOLEP
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 24eOLEP Participants who did not receive RBC transfusion and had no decrease in hemoglobin levels
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 52eOLEP Participants who did not receive RBC transfusion and had no decrease in hemoglobin levels
Change in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eOLEP
Change in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP
Percentage of Participants With Per-Protocol Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) through Week 24eOLEP Not requiring a RBC transfusion as per protocol algorithm
Percentage of Participants With Per-Protocol Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP Not requiring a RBC transfusion as per protocol algorithm
Rate of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eOLEP
Rate of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP
Number of Units of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eOLEP
Number of Units of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP
Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 16eOLEP
Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eOLEP
Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP
Percent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 16eOLEP
Percent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eOLEP
Percent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP
Percent Change of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Pre-treatment to End-of-treatment PeriodEnd of treatment period, approximately 28 WeeksOLTP Pre-treatment (mean of LDH values prior to combination dosing); End-of-treatment (mean of LDH value at week 24- through week 28); percentage of change in Upper Limit of Normal (xULN).
Change in GHS/QoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP; EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.
Change in PF Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP; EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs Up to Week 52Up to Week 52OLEP
Concentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 52On Week 52OLEP
Concentrations of Total C5 on Week 52On Week 52OLEP
Concentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 52On Week 52OLEP
Change in Fatigue as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eBaseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eOLEP; The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item, self-administered assessment of an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. This questionnaire is part of the FACIT measurement system, a compilation of questions measuring health-related QoL in participants with cancer and other chronic illnesses. The FACIT-Fatigue items are measured with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. A 5-point change is considered clinically meaningful.

Countries

Hong Kong, Hungary, Malaysia, South Korea, Taiwan, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Twenty-four participants were screened and randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pozelimab Q2W + Cemdisiran
Pozelimab administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks (Q2W) and cemdisiran administered by subcutanous (SC) injection. The first dose of the combination treatment (pozelimab Q2W + cemdisiran) was administered on day 1 of the open-label treatment period (OLTP). In the open- label extension period (OLEP), participants received a regimen of pozelimab + cemdisiran, regardless of their treatment assignment in the OLTP.
12
Pozelimab Q4W + Cemdisiran
Pozelimab administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (Q4W) and cemdisiran administered by subcutanous (SC) injection. The first dose of the combination treatment was administered on day 1 of the OLTP. In the OLEP, participants received a regimen of pozelimab Q4W + cemdisiran, regardless of their treatment assignment in the OLTP.
12
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranTotal
Age, Continuous41.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.89
53.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.38
47.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.34
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
10 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 125 / 1210 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 120 / 122 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Open Label Treatment Period (OLTP)

Time frame: Through Week 28

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF) included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated); Here 'number analyzed' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any TEAE66.7 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with serious TEAE16.7 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with severe TEAE16.7 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any TEAE41.7 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with serious TEAE0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with severe TEAE0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Average LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLEP Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranAverage LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLEP Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e154.63 U/LStandard Deviation 38.231
Secondary

Average LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranAverage LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28238.18 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 44.006
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranAverage LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28244.42 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 39.085
Secondary

Average LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Week 4 Through Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: Week 4 through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranAverage LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Week 4 Through Week 28202.49 U/LStandard Deviation 38.272
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranAverage LDH (U/L) Based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) From OLTP Week 4 Through Week 28211.28 U/LStandard Deviation 34.28
Secondary

Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16e0.0 U/mLStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint; No CH50 samples were collected at Week 24e

Secondary

Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e0.0 U/mLStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Change in Fatigue as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP; The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item, self-administered assessment of an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. This questionnaire is part of the FACIT measurement system, a compilation of questions measuring health-related QoL in participants with cancer and other chronic illnesses. The FACIT-Fatigue items are measured with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. A 5-point change is considered clinically meaningful.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Fatigue as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
Secondary

Change in Fatigue as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP FACIT fatigue is a 13-item scale and for each item 4 is not at all fatigued to 0 very much fatigued. Higher FACIT-Fatigue scores indicate less fatigue (scores range from 0-52). A 5-point change is considered clinically meaningful.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Fatigue as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28-6.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.09
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranChange in Fatigue as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28-2.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.36
Secondary

Change in GHS/QoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP; EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in GHS/QoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e6.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.73
Secondary

Change in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale (GHS/QoL) on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale (GHS/QoL) on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28-9.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.33
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranChange in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale (GHS/QoL) on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.03
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e0.8 g/LStandard Deviation 15.63
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e-0.6 g/LStandard Deviation 12.6
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28-1.3 grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 13.77
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranChange in Hemoglobin Levels From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 2810.3 grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 7.41
Secondary

Change in PF Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP; EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in PF Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.93
Secondary

Change in Physical Function (PF) Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP; EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Physical Function (PF) Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28-6.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.19
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranChange in Physical Function (PF) Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 280.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
Secondary

Change in Total Complement Hemolysis Activity Assay (CH50) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange in Total Complement Hemolysis Activity Assay (CH50) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 280.0 Units per milliliter (U/mL)Standard Deviation 0
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranChange in Total Complement Hemolysis Activity Assay (CH50) From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28-0.1 Units per milliliter (U/mL)Standard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Change of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Optional Open-Label Extension Period (OLEP)

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e-18.2 U/LStandard Deviation 108.4
Secondary

Change of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranChange of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e-14.5 U/LStandard Deviation 105.9
Secondary

Concentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: On Week 28

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set includes all treated participants who received any amount of study drug (SAF) and who had at least 1 non-missing analyte measurement following the first dose of combination treatment. The PK analysis set is based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 28NA mg/L
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 28NA mg/L
Secondary

Concentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 52

OLEP

Time frame: On Week 52

Population: The OLEP pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set includes all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and who had at least 1 non-missing analyte measurement following the first dose of study drug in the OLEP.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 52NA mg/L
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Cemdisiran in Plasma on Week 52NA mg/L
Secondary

Concentrations of Total C5 on Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: On Week 28

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set includes all treated participants who received any amount of study drug (SAF) and who had at least 1 non-missing analyte measurement following the first dose of combination treatment. The PK analysis set is based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total C5 on Week 280 mg/L
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total C5 on Week 280 mg/L
Secondary

Concentrations of Total C5 on Week 52

OLEP

Time frame: On Week 52

Population: The OLEP pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set includes all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and who had at least 1 non-missing analyte measurement following the first dose of study drug in the OLEP.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total C5 on Week 520 mg/L
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total C5 on Week 52NA mg/L
Secondary

Concentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: On Week 28

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set includes all treated participants who received any amount of study drug (SAF) and who had at least 1 non-missing analyte measurement following the first dose of combination treatment. The PK analysis set is based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 28131 mg/LStandard Deviation 74.8
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 2858.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 31.5
Secondary

Concentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 52

OLEP

Time frame: On Week 52

Population: The OLEP pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set includes all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and who had at least 1 non-missing analyte measurement following the first dose of study drug in the OLEP.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 5263.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 35.6
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranConcentrations of Total Pozelimab in Serum on Week 5258.6 mg/LStandard Deviation 28.7
Secondary

Number of Participants With Cemdisiran Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over Time

OLTP and OLEP

Time frame: Up to Week 52 (OLTP [ Week 0 - Week 28] + OLEP [Week 28 - Week 52])

Population: Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Analysis Set; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a certain timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Cemdisiran Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Cemdisiran Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Emergent Response0 Participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Cemdisiran Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Cemdisiran Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Emergent Response1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pozelimab Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over Time

OLTP and OLEP

Time frame: Up to Week 52 (OLTP [ Week 0 - Week 28] + OLEP [Week 28 - Week 52])

Population: Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Analysis Set; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a certain timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Pozelimab Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Pozelimab Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Emergent Response0 Participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Pozelimab Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranNumber of Participants With Pozelimab Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Responses Over TimeTreatment-Emergent Response0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Per-Protocol RBC Units Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranNumber of Per-Protocol RBC Units Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 281.5 UnitsStandard Deviation 3.73
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranNumber of Per-Protocol RBC Units Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 280.0 UnitsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Units of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranNumber of Units of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e0.4 UnitsStandard Deviation 1.47
Secondary

Number of Units of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranNumber of Units of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e0.9 UnitsStandard Deviation 3.95
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e95.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e95.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP Adequate control of hemolysis is defined as LDH values ≤1.5 × Upper limit of normal (ULN) from baseline (day 1) to week 28

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'number analyzed' is the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 2875.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 2891.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Week 4 Through Week 28

OLTP

Time frame: Week 4 through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'number analyzed' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Week 4 Through Week 2883.3 Percentage of Participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate Control of Hemolysis From Week 4 Through Week 2891.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28

OLTP; Adequate control at a visit is defined as having LDH \<=1.5 x ULN at that visit

Time frame: Day 1 through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'number analyzed' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 1100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 10100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 483.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 12100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Pre-treatment100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 16100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 692.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 20100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 2100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 24100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 8100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 2892.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Baseline Visit (Day 1)100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 28100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Baseline Visit (Day 1)100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Pre-treatment100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 1100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 2100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 4100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 6100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 8100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 10100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 1292.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 16100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 20100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit Day 1 Through Week 28Week 24100.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e

OLEP Adequate control at a visit is defined as having LDH \<=1.5 x ULN at that visit

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eOLEP Baseline (Day 1e)96.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 8e100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 16e100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 24e100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 32e100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 40e100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Adequate Control of Hemolysis at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 52e100.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e4.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e4.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP Breakthrough hemolysis is defined as an increase in LDH with concomitant signs or symptoms associated with hemolysis: • An increase in LDH occurs when: * LDH ≥2 × ULN if pre-treatment LDH is ≤1.5 × ULN or * LDH ≥2 × ULN after initial achievement of LDH ≤1.5 × ULN if pre-treatment LDH is \>1.5 × ULN Signs or symptoms should correspond to those known to be associated with intravascular hemolysis due to Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) limited to the following: new onset or worsening fatigue, headache, dyspnea, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, scleral icterus, erectile dysfunction, chest pain, confusion, dysphagia, anemia including hemoglobin value significantly lower (ie, ≥2g/dL decrease) compared to patient's known baseline hemoglobin values, and thrombotic event.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 288.3 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Breakthrough Hemolysis From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 280.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e

OLEP Participants who did not receive RBC transfusion and had no decrease in hemoglobin levels

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e78.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e

OLEP Participants who did not receive RBC transfusion and had no decrease in hemoglobin levels

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e69.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP Hemoglobin stabilization was defined as participants who did not receive an RBC transfusion and had no decrease in hemoglobin level of ≥2 grams per deciLiter (g/dL).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 2875.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Stabilization From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 2891.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eOLEP Baseline (Day 1e)87.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 8e83.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 16e82.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 24e82.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 32e86.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 40e82.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52eWeek 52e82.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP; Normalization of LDH was defined as LDH ≤1.0 × ULN at each visit

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'number analyzed' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 1100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 10100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 483.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 1292.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Pre-treatment92.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 1692.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 683.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 20100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1)92.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 24100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 8100.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 2883.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 292.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 2883.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 283.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Baseline (Day 1)75.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Pre-treatment83.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 192.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 483.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 675.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 882.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 1083.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 1283.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 1675.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 2092.0 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Normalization of LDH at Each Visit From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28Week 2492.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Per-Protocol Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e

OLEP Not requiring a RBC transfusion as per protocol algorithm

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) through Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Per-Protocol Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 24e87.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Per-Protocol Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e

OLEP Not requiring a RBC transfusion as per protocol algorithm

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Per-Protocol Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1e) Through Week 52e87.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With TEAEs for Participants Who Received Treatment Intensification

OLTP No participants received dose intensification during the study; Therefore, assessment of the safety of pozelimab + cemdisiran combination therapy in participants requiring dose intensification was not conducted.

Time frame: Through Week 28

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF) included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug and was based on the treatment received (as treated); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue
UnknownPercentage of Participants With TEAEs for Participants Who Received Treatment IntensificationParticipants with any TEAE
UnknownPercentage of Participants With TEAEs for Participants Who Received Treatment IntensificationParticipants with any serious TEAE
UnknownPercentage of Participants With TEAEs for Participants Who Received Treatment IntensificationParticipants with any severe TEAE
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With TEAEs Up to Week 52

OLEP

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The OLEP SAF includes all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With TEAEs Up to Week 52Participants with any TEAE73.9 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With TEAEs Up to Week 52Participants with serious TEAE8.7 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With TEAEs Up to Week 52Participants with severe TEAE4.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28

OLTP Not requiring a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion as per protocol algorithm

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 2883.3 Percentage of participants
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Avoidance From Baseline (Day 1) Through Week 28100.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint; Since all participants had 0 values at baseline for CH50, the percentage change was not appropriate and undefined. Therefore, this endpoint was not able to be calculated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 16eNA Percentage of change
Secondary

Percent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint; Since all participants had 0 values at baseline for CH50, the percentage change was not appropriate and undefined. Therefore, this endpoint was not able to be calculated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24eNA Percentage of change
Secondary

Percent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint; Since all participants had 0 values at baseline for CH50, the percentage change was not appropriate and undefined. Therefore, this endpoint was not able to be calculated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercent Change in CH50 From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52eNA Percentage of change
Secondary

Percent Change of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Pre-treatment to End-of-treatment Period

OLTP Pre-treatment (mean of LDH values prior to combination dosing); End-of-treatment (mean of LDH value at week 24- through week 28); percentage of change in Upper Limit of Normal (xULN).

Time frame: End of treatment period, approximately 28 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'number analyzed' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercent Change of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Pre-treatment to End-of-treatment Period2.93 Percentage of changeStandard Deviation 36.575
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranPercent Change of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Pre-treatment to End-of-treatment Period3.65 Percentage of changeStandard Deviation 13.608
Secondary

Percent Change of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercent Change of LDH From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e0.2 Percentage of changeStandard Deviation 19.49
Secondary

Percent Change of LDH From OLEP Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

OLEP; Percentage of change for units per liter (U/L)

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranPercent Change of LDH From OLEP Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e-0.7 Percentage of changeStandard Deviation 20.6
Secondary

Rate of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranRate of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 24e0.591 Events per person-years of treatment
Secondary

Rate of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

OLEP

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e

Population: OLEP FAS included all participants who participated in the OLEP who received any amount of study drug in the OLEP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment in the OLEP; Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranRate of RBCs Transfused From Baseline (Day 1e) to Week 52e0.506 Events per person-years of treatment
Secondary

Rate of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

OLTP Rate of RBCs transfused is defined as number of events per person-years of treatment. For each participant, the participant-years are the time from first dose date to week 28 (or early terminations visit if subject discontinued the study early) in the OLTP.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug \& had at least 1 post-baseline assessment; based on treatment allocated (as randomized); Here 'n' = the number of evaluable participants at a specified timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pozelimab Q2W + CemdisiranRate of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 281.284 Events per person-years of treatment
Pozelimab Q4W + CemdisiranRate of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfused From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28NA Events per person-years of treatment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026