Skip to content

Study of OCA in Combination With BZF Evaluating Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability in Participants With PBC

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Obeticholic Acid Administered in Combination With Bezafibrate in Subjects With Primary Biliary Cholangitis Who Had an Inadequate Response or Who Were Unable to Tolerate Ursodeoxycholic Acid

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04594694
Enrollment
75
Registered
2020-10-20
Start date
2019-10-02
Completion date
2025-10-14
Last updated
2026-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Keywords

Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Primary Biliary Cirrhosis, PBC, Hepatic Impairment, Cirrhosis, Liver

Brief summary

Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of investigational drug obeticholic acid (OCA) in combination with the investigational drug bezafibrate (BZF) in participants with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC).

Interventions

5 mg tablet of OCA once daily titrating up to a maximum of 10 mg OCA once daily

200 mg IR tablet of Bezafibrate once daily for the remainder of the study

DRUGOCA Placebo

One tablet daily for the remainder of the study

DRUGBezafibrate 200 mg Placebo

One tablet daily for the remainder of the study

DRUGBezafibrate 400 MG

400 mg SR tablet of Bezafibrate once daily for the remainder of the study

DRUGBezafibrate 400 mg Placebo

One tablet daily for the remainder of the study

DRUGOCA

OCA one tablet will be administered.

Bezafibrate one tablet will be administered.

Sponsors

Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A definite or probable diagnosis of PBC * Qualifying ALP and/or bilirubin liver biochemistry values * Taking Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) for at least 12 months or no UDCA for 3 months before Day 1

Exclusion criteria

* History or presence of other concomitant liver diseases * Clinical complications of PBC * History or presence of hepatic decompensating events * Current or history of gallbladder disease * If female, known pregnancy, or has a positive urine pregnancy test (confirmed by a positive serum pregnancy test), or lactating * Treatment with commercially available OCA or other farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists, or participation in a previous study involving OCA within 3 months before Screening. Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) From Baseline in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodBaseline to Week 12Serum samples were collected at scheduled visits during the double-blind treatment period. Changes in ALP over time will be analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) to assess treatment group effects across study visits. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product in the DB period. Change from Baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Response Rates of ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30% and ≥40% Reduction From Baseline in ALP in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodWeek 12Responders were defined as participants achieving a ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, or ≥40% reduction from baseline in serum ALP at Week 12 with non-responder imputation applied. Baseline ALP was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product in the DB period. The percentage of responders were summarized by treatment group for each response threshold and compared using a Cochran Mantel Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.
Normalization Rates of ALP at Week 12 in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodWeek 12Percentage of participants achieving a response in serum ALP at Week 12 was assessed using non-responder imputation. Analyses of ALP response rates and normalization rates were performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.
Normalization Rates of Biochemical Disease Markers in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodWeek 12Percentage of participants achieving a response in biochemical disease markers including Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Total and conjugated Bilirubin and lipid panel (cholesterol, high density lipoprotein \[HDL\] and low-density lipoprotein \[LDL\]) at Week 12 has been presented. Analyses of response rates and normalization rates were performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the randomization stratification factor.
Change From Baseline in GGT, ALT and AST Levels in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and at Week 12Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoint and change from Baseline in GGT, ALT and AST were analyzed using the MMRM model and results were summarized in standard International System of Units (SI) by treatment group using descriptive statistics at baseline and at each on-study evaluation. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product in the DB period. Change from baseline was calculated as post baseline value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Total and Conjugated Bilirubin in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and at Week 12Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints and the changes in total and conjugated bilirubin were evaluated using MMRM to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product in the DB period. Change from baseline was calculated as post baseline value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Panel in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and at Week 12Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints and the changes in lipid panel including cholesterol, HDL and LDL were evaluated using MMRM to assess the effects of treatment groups over time. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product in the DB period. Change from Baseline was calculated as post Baseline value minus Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha (α) Hydroxy 4 Cholesten-3 One (C4) in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and at Week 12Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for the assessment of C4. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from Baseline was calculated as change equals post baseline value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Bile Acid in the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and at Week 12Blood samples were collected for the assessment of bile acids. Baseline was defined as the mean of all available evaluations prior to the first administration of investigational product. Change from Baseline was calculated as change equals post Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORLynda Szczech

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a Phase 2, Proof -of-concept, randomized, double-blind (DB), parallel-group study that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obeticholic acid (OCA) administered in combination with 2 different Bezafibrate (BZF) doses or BZF alone participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) for up to 12 weeks.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 75 participants were enrolled. Two participants in the DB period discontinued study treatment during the DB period but remained in the study until its completion for safety follow-up. As they were no longer receiving the investigational product, they did not proceed into the LTSE period.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 190 / 190 / 180 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 1915 / 1916 / 1914 / 1847 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 191 / 193 / 192 / 181 / 64

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026