Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of X842 in Patients With Reflux Esophagitis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-simulation, Active Comparator-controlled, Parallel-group Phase II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of X842 Capsules at Different Dosages in Patients With Reflux Esophagitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04531475
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-08-28
Start date
2020-01-21
Completion date
2021-01-12
Last updated
2025-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Reflux Esophagitis

Keywords

X842, Reflux Esophagitis, GERD, PCAB

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and dose-effect relationship of X842 capsules at different dosages in the treatment of reflux esophagitis for 4 weeks in comparison with lansoprazole enteric-coated capsules.

Detailed description

It is designed as a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-simulation, high and low dose group, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the efficacy and dose-effect relationship of X842 capsules at different dosages in the treatment of reflux esophagitis for 4 weeks in comparison with lansoprazole enteric-coated capsules.

Interventions

DRUGX842

X842 capsules

X842 placebo-matching capsules

DRUGLansoprazole

Lansoprazole capsules

Lansoprazole placebo-matching capsules

Sponsors

Jiangsu Sinorda Biomedicine Co., Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This trial uses a double-blind double-dummy design, where both the investigator and the subject are blinded to the drug given to the subject. X842 capsules (test group), lansoprazole enteric-coated capsules (control group), and placebo are provided by the sponsor. The physical appearance, shape, specification and dosage of the test drug and comparator as well as the placebo are generally similar.

Intervention model description

After completing the relevant laboratory tests and endoscopic examinations at screening, subjects who meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet the exclusion criteria are randomly assigned to X842 capsule low-dose group, X842 capsule high-dose group, and lansoprazole enteric-coated capsule group for 4-week treatment and then receive endoscopy. In the study, the duration of subjects receiving treatment with the test drug or comparator is 4 weeks. If a subject has the reflux esophagitis (RE) uncured under endoscopy at week 4 of treatment, the sponsor will give the subject lansoprazole enteric-coated capsules for free for another 4 weeks' treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females, 18 years ≤ age ≤ 75 years; 2. Within 14 days prior to randomization, the subjects are endoscopically diagnosed with reflux esophagitis from Los Angeles (LA) grade A to D (notes: the percent of the subjects with LA grade A of RE should be no more than 60% of the all subjects who are planned to be enrolled in the study); 3. Subjects fully understand the trial contents, participate in the trial voluntarily, and sign the informed consent forms.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects who receive X842 capsules or other P-CAB drugs in previous clinical studies; 2. Subjects known to be allergic to X842 capsules or lansoprazole enteric-coated capsules, or relevant excipients of X842 capsules or lansoprazole enteric-coated capsules, such as lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium stearyl fumarate, and silicon dioxide; 3. Subjects unable to receive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; 4. Subjects unable to independently complete the subject diary cards; 5. Subjects known to have any concomitant disease that may affect the esophagus (eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal varices, dermatosclerosis, viral or fungal infectious esophagitis, or esophageal stenosis), or have a history of esophageal radiotherapy or cryotherapy (but subjects are eligible for this study if they have concomitant esophageal hiatal hernia) 6. Subjects known to have a history of Barrett's esophagus, or who have Barrett's esophagus discovered during endoscopy at screening; 7. Subjects who have acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to enrollment; 8. Subjects with active peptic ulcer discovered during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, or subjects with suspicious or definite malignancies; 9. Subjects known to have Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); 10. Subjects with concomitant cholecystolithiasis, gallbladder wall crystal or gallbladder polyp discovered by B ultrasonography at screening; 11. Subjects with a history of surgery that may affect the esophagus (for example, fundoplication and mechanical distension for esophageal stenosis), or subjects with a history of cholecystectmy or surgery of stomach or duodenum (except endoscopic excision of benign polyps, and except simple suture surgeries such as for gastric perforation); 12. Subjects with a history of malignancies within 5 years prior to screening (a subject can participate in the study if his /her skin basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of uterine cervix has been cured); 13. Subjects with concomitant serious diseases of central nervous system, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, urinary system, endocrine system, or hematological system, and the investigator thinks these diseases may mix the study results up or affect the safety of the subject; 14. Laboratory test results at screening showing that ALT or AST is larger than 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal, or kidney function index Cr is larger than the upper limit of normal (a re-examination is permitted in the study, and subjects will be excluded if they still fail to meet the inclusion criteria); 15. Subjects who use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), P-CABs, histamine2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), or gastric mucosal protectors (except hydrotalcite) within 2 weeks prior to randomization; 16. Subjects who chronically use (\>12 doses / month) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (including cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor), anti-platelet drug (such as aspirin and clopidogrel), or anticoagulant (such as Warfarin) prior to randomization, and can not stop the medication during the trial; 17. At screening, subjects with clinically significant ECG abnormalities, including serious arrhythmia, multifocal preventricular contraction (PVC), grade II or above atrioventricular block, and prolongation of the Q-T interval (QTc≥450 ms in males and QTc≥470 ms in females); 18. Diabetic subjects with poorly controlled blood glucose level (fasting blood glucose (FBG) \> 10.0 mmol/L), or hypertensive subjects with poorly controlled blood pressure (systolic pressure ≥150 mmHg or diastolic pressure ≥100 mmHg); 19. Subjects with known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS); 20. Subjects who are using atazanavir sulfate or ripivirin hydrochloride at screening; 21. Subjects with a history of long-term abuse of drug or alcohol within 6 months prior to screening; 22. Female subjects with suspicious or known pregnancy, those in breast-feeding period, or those who are planned to become pregnant during the trial. At the investigator's discretion, women of childbearing age who cannot use a medically-proven and reliable method of contraception from signing the informed consent forms to 4 weeks after the last dose of the study; 23. Subject who plan to have a surgery requiring hospitalization, or subject who need to have a surgery during his/her participation in the study; 24. Subjects who participate in other drug/medical device clinical studies and use the drug/medical device within 3 months prior to randomization; 25. Subjects who are considered unsuitable for participating in this trial by investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects Whose Reflux Esophagitis is Cured as Confirmed by Endoscopy at Week 4 of Treatment4 weeksSubjects cured of RE are defined as subjects who are endoscopically confirmed to be cured of RE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Gerd-Q Score at Week 2 and 4 Compared With the BaselineWeek 2 and Week 4Subjects must record RE symptoms that occur within 7d prior to each visit in the Gerd-Q under the guidance of the investigator.
Changes in Serum Gastrin at Week 2 and 4 of Treatment Compared with the BaselineWeek 2 and Week 4Serum gastrin testing will be conducted at the central laboratory. The change between the serum gastrin values collected at Weeks 2 and 4 relative to baseline.
Measurement of the PK ProfileWeek 2 and Week 4Plasma concentrations of X842 and its metabolites are measured to determine X842 exposure in patients.
Number of Subjects Reporting Who Had One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Up to 6 weeksAdverse event is defined as any adverse medical event that is observed in a subject who is receiving a drug treatment or in a clinical study, and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Number of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Clinical Laboratory assessment of blood serumUp to 6 weeksNumber of subjects with any markedly abnormal values in laboratory tests of blood serum collected throughout study is reported.
Proportion of Subjects Whose Reflux Esophagitis LA Grade is Decreased by ≥1 as Confirmed by Endoscopy at Week 4 of Treatment4 weeksThe endoscopic results must describe RE severity according to the LA grading criteria.
Number of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Clinical Laboratory assessment of urineUp to 6 weeksNumber of subjects with any markedly abnormal values in laboratory tests of urine collected throughout study is reported.collected throughout study is reported.
Number of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsUp to 6 weeksThe investigator or the sub-investigator interpreted the ECG using one of the following categories: within normal limits, abnormal but not clinically significant, or abnormal and clinically significant.
Vital signs of body temperatureUp to 6 weeks°C = degrees Celsius
Vital signs of blood pressureUp to 6 weeksBlood pressure measurements included systolic (mmHg) and diastolic (mmHg).
Number of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Clinical Laboratory assessment of bloodUp to 6 weeksNumber of subjects with any markedly abnormal values in laboratory tests of blood collected throughout study is reported.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026