Skip to content

Pharmacokinetic Study of Aztreonam-Avibactam in Severe Renal Impairment

AN OPEN-LABEL, PARALLEL-GROUP, PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF MULTIPLE INTRAVENOUS DOSES OF AZTREONAM AND AVIBACTAM IN SUBJECTS WITH SEVERE RENAL IMPAIRMENT AND NORMAL RENAL FUNCTION

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04486625
Enrollment
11
Registered
2020-07-24
Start date
2020-08-10
Completion date
2021-10-18
Last updated
2023-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency

Keywords

Infection

Brief summary

This Phase 1 study is being conducted to evaluate the effect of severe renal impairment on the PK, safety and tolerability of Aztreonam-Avibactam. Results from this study along with previous renal impairment data from each of the Aztreonam-Avibactam components will be used to confirm the proposed dosing adjustment in severe renal impairment which was based on modelling/simulation.

Interventions

500/167 mg ATM/AVI loading infusion, followed by 1500/500 mg ATM/AVI extended loading infusion, then 1500/500 mg ATM/AVI maintenance dose infusion every 6 hours

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy female subjects and/or male subjects between the ages of 18 and 75 years, inclusive. Male and female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use highly effective method(s) of contraception * Body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 40.5 kg/m2; and a total body weight \>50 kg (110 lb) * Stable renal function defined as \</=25% difference between 2 measurements of eGFR obtained on 2 separate occasions during the screening period that are at least 72 hours but no more than 14 days apart Specific Requirements for Healthy Subjects with Normal Renal Function * Normal renal function (eGFR\>/= 80 mL/min) at Screening based on the Day -2 value, using the MDRD formula adjusting for BSA * Demographically comparable to the group of subjects with severe impaired renal function Specific Requirements for Subjects with Severe Renal Impairment * Good general health commensurate with the population with chronic kidney disease. * Documented severe renal impairment indicated by eGFR \>15 -\</=30 mL/min but not requiring hemodialysis, using the MDRD formula adjusting for BSA

Exclusion criteria

* Positive urine drug test * History of regular alcohol use (within 6 months) exceeding 7 drinks/week for female or 14 drinks/week for male subjects * Treatment with an investigational product within 30 days or 5 half-lives preceding the first dose of investigational product (whichever is longer) * Subjects with abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests (AST, ALT, Total bilirubin, aPTT, PT, INR) at Screening * Pregnant females; breastfeeding females; fertile male subjects and female subjects of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use a highly effective method of contraception * Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs and dietary supplements within 7 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of investigational product. For subjects with severe renal impairment, concomitant medications may be given if considered necessary for the subject welfare (eg, standard therapy for underlying diseases), are not contraindicated with the study drug, and are unlikely to interfere with the PK/PD response of the study drug. Use of oral anticoagulants and potent inhibitors of OAT1 and/or OAT3 (eg, probenecid) are prohibited in all subjects. * Blood donation (excluding plasma donations) of approximately 1 pint or more within 60 days prior to dosing * History of sensitivity to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia * History of serious allergy, hypersensitivity or any serious reaction to aztreonam, carbapenem, monobactam or other beta-lactam antibiotics, avibactam, or any of the excipients of the respective (investigational) medicinal products * History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C * Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition * Past or current history of epilepsy or seizure disorders excluding febrile seizures of childhood

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-state (AUC0-24,ss) of Aztreonam (ATM)Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4\*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3\*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval).
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Cmax of ATM was observed directly from data.
AUC0-24,ss of Avibactam (AVI)Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4\*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3\*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval).
Cmax of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Cmax of AVI was observed directly from data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression.
Clearance (CL) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Renal Clearance (CLr) of ATMIn Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau\*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2).
Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau) of ATMIn Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration\*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau%) of ATMIn Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100\*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
AUC0-tau of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The UC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).A
Tmax of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Ctau of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
t1/2 of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Time Tau (The Dosing Interval)(AUC0-tau) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The AUC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
CLr of AVIIn Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Vz of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau\*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2).
Vss of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.Vss was calculated by CL\*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time.
Ae0-tau of AVIIn Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration\*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Ae0-tau% of AVIIn Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100\*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function.
Number of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event attributed to the study medication. A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function.
Number of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataDays 1 to 3Categorical post-baseline vital signs included: (1) pulse rate: value less than (\<) 40 beats per minute (bpm), lager than (\>) 120 bpm; (2) supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP): value \<50 mmHg, change of more than or equal to (\>=) 20 mmHg increase, change of \>=20 mmHg decrease; (3) supine systolic blood pressure (SBP): value \<90 mmHg, change of \>=30 mmHg increase, change of \>=30 mmHg decrease.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)Days 1 to 3Criteria for ECG abnormalities: maximum QT interval \>500 milliseconds (msec); maximum QTc interval of \>=450 msec to less than or equal to (\<=) 480 msec, \>480 msec, and \>500 msec and a maximum change of \<30 change\<=60 or \>60 msec from baseline; maximum QTcF (Fridericia's Correction) interval of \>=450 msec to \<=480 msec, \>480 msec, and \>500 msec and a maximum change of \<30 change\<=60 or \>60 msec from baseline.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Days 1 to 3Following laboratory parameters were abnormal (without regard to baseline abnormality): hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, activated partial thromboplastin time, protein, urea nitrogen, creatinine, urate, urine glucose, and urine protein.
CL of AVIPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-state (Vss) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.Vss was calculated by CL\*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time.
Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) (Ctau) of ATMPredose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This was a Phase 1, open-label, parallel-group study where an intravenous (IV) loading dose (30-minute infusion) followed by multiple IV doses (3-hour infusion) of aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) were administered to participants with severe renal impairment (not on dialysis) (Cohort 1) and to healthy participants with normal renal function (Cohort 2).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Function
Participants with normal renal function received 30-minute IV loading dose infusion (500/167 mg aztreonam \[ATM\]/avibactam \[AVI\]), followed by 3-hour IV extended loading infusion (1500/500 mg ATM/AVI), then 3-hour 1500/500 mg ATM/AVI maintenance dose infusion every 6 hours on Days 1 to 3.
6
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairment
Participants with severe renal impairment (not on dialysis) received 30-minute IV loading dose infusion (675/255 mg aztreonam \[ATM\]/avibactam \[AVI\]), followed by 3-hour IV extended loading infusion (675/255 mg ATM/AVI), then 3-hour 675/255 mg ATM/AVI maintenance dose infusion every 8 hours on Days 1 to 3.
5
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionCohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentTotal
Age, Continuous
Mean
61.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
67.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
64.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.58
Body Weight98.65 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.354
101.06 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.068
99.75 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.491
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 63 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

AUC0-24,ss of Avibactam (AVI)

AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4\*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of AVI in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3\*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionAUC0-24,ss of Avibactam (AVI)164.8 ug*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentAUC0-24,ss of Avibactam (AVI)204.6 ug*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20
90% CI: [100.18, 153.97]
Primary

Cmax of AVI

The Cmax of AVI was observed directly from data.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionCmax of AVI11.08 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentCmax of AVI11.35 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14
90% CI: [87.55, 119.83]
Primary

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ATM

The Cmax of ATM was observed directly from data.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ATM57.34 Microgram per milliliter (ug/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of ATM43.34 Microgram per milliliter (ug/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11
90% CI: [66.1, 86.43]
Primary

Total Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-state (AUC0-24,ss) of Aztreonam (ATM)

AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 1 was calculated by 4\*AUC0-tau (tau = 6 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). AUC0-24,ss of ATM in Cohort 2 was calculated by 3\*AUC0-tau (tau = 8 hours), where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionTotal Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-state (AUC0-24,ss) of Aztreonam (ATM)922.9 Microgram*hour per milliliter (ug*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentTotal Daily Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to 24 Hours at Steady-state (AUC0-24,ss) of Aztreonam (ATM)733.5 Microgram*hour per milliliter (ug*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16
90% CI: [66.52, 94.96]
Secondary

Ae0-tau of AVI

The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration\*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionAe0-tau of AVI465.6 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentAe0-tau of AVI270.0 mgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17
Secondary

Ae0-tau% of AVI

The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100\*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionAe0-tau% of AVI93.19 Percent of doseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentAe0-tau% of AVI119.9 Percent of doseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-state (Vss) of ATM

Vss was calculated by CL\*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionApparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-state (Vss) of ATM23.70 LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentApparent Volume of Distribution at Steady-state (Vss) of ATM18.46 LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of ATM

The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau\*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of ATM24.25 Liters (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of ATM18.79 Liters (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Time Tau (The Dosing Interval)(AUC0-tau) of ATM

The AUC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Time Tau (The Dosing Interval)(AUC0-tau) of ATM230.8 ug*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Time Tau (The Dosing Interval)(AUC0-tau) of ATM244.3 ug*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Secondary

AUC0-tau of AVI

The UC0-tau was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).A

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionAUC0-tau of AVI41.19 ug*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentAUC0-tau of AVI68.31 ug*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20
Secondary

Clearance (CL) of ATM

The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionClearance (CL) of ATM6.499 Liters per hour (L/hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentClearance (CL) of ATM2.761 Liters per hour (L/hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Secondary

CL of AVI

The CL was calculated by dose/AUC0-tau, where AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionCL of AVI12.16 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentCL of AVI3.295 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20
Secondary

CLr of AVI

The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionCLr of AVI11.30 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentCLr of AVI3.948 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36
Secondary

Ctau of AVI

The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionCtau of AVI3.100 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentCtau of AVI5.597 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Secondary

Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau) of ATM

The Ae0-tau was the sum of (urine concentration\*sample volume). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionCumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau) of ATM1047 Milligram (mg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentCumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau) of ATM361.2 Milligram (mg)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Criteria for ECG abnormalities: maximum QT interval \>500 milliseconds (msec); maximum QTc interval of \>=450 msec to less than or equal to (\<=) 480 msec, \>480 msec, and \>500 msec and a maximum change of \<30 change\<=60 or \>60 msec from baseline; maximum QTcF (Fridericia's Correction) interval of \>=450 msec to \<=480 msec, \>480 msec, and \>500 msec and a maximum change of \<30 change\<=60 or \>60 msec from baseline.

Time frame: Days 1 to 3

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTc interval value >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)450 msec<= QTcF interval value <=480 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTc interval value >480 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF interval value >480 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)30 msec< QTc interval change <=60 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF interval value >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)450 msec<= QTc interval value <=480 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)30 msec< QTcF interval change <=60 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTc interval change >60 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF interval change >60 msec0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT interval value > 500 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF interval change >60 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QT interval value > 500 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)450 msec<= QTc interval value <=480 msec2 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTc interval value >480 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTc interval value >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)30 msec< QTc interval change <=60 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTc interval change >60 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)450 msec<= QTcF interval value <=480 msec2 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF interval value >480 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF interval value >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)30 msec< QTcF interval change <=60 msec0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs Data

Categorical post-baseline vital signs included: (1) pulse rate: value less than (\<) 40 beats per minute (bpm), lager than (\>) 120 bpm; (2) supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP): value \<50 mmHg, change of more than or equal to (\>=) 20 mmHg increase, change of \>=20 mmHg decrease; (3) supine systolic blood pressure (SBP): value \<90 mmHg, change of \>=30 mmHg increase, change of \>=30 mmHg decrease.

Time frame: Days 1 to 3

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataPulse rate <40 bpm0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataPulse rate >120 bpm0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine DBP <50 mmHg0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine DBP change >=20 mmHg increase0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine DBP change >=20 mmHg decrease0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine SBP <90 mmHg0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine SBP change >=30 mmHg increase0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine SBP change >=30 mmHg decrease0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine SBP change >=30 mmHg decrease0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataPulse rate <40 bpm0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine DBP change >=20 mmHg decrease0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataPulse rate >120 bpm0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine SBP change >=30 mmHg increase1 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine DBP <50 mmHg0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine SBP <90 mmHg0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Categorical Post-Baseline Vital Signs DataSupine DBP change >=20 mmHg increase0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

Following laboratory parameters were abnormal (without regard to baseline abnormality): hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, activated partial thromboplastin time, protein, urea nitrogen, creatinine, urate, urine glucose, and urine protein.

Time frame: Days 1 to 3

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Hemoglobin (gram per deciliter [g/dL]) <0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN)0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Hematocrit (%) <0.8*LLN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Erythrocytes (10^6 per cubic millimeter [10^6/mm^3]) <0.8*LLN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Lymphocytes (10^3 per cubic millimeter [10^3/mm^3]) <0.8*LLN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*upper limit of normal (ULN)0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Activated partial thromboplastin time (second) >1.1*ULN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Protein (g/dL) <0.8*LLN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urea Nitrogen (milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) >1.3*ULN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Creatinine (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urate (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urine glucose (mg/dL) >=10 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urine protein (mg/dL) >=10 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urine glucose (mg/dL) >=13 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Hemoglobin (gram per deciliter [g/dL]) <0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN)3 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Protein (g/dL) <0.8*LLN1 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Hematocrit (%) <0.8*LLN3 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urate (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN3 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Erythrocytes (10^6 per cubic millimeter [10^6/mm^3]) <0.8*LLN4 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urea Nitrogen (milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) >1.3*ULN5 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Lymphocytes (10^3 per cubic millimeter [10^3/mm^3]) <0.8*LLN1 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Urine protein (mg/dL) >=11 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*upper limit of normal (ULN)1 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Creatinine (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN5 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)Activated partial thromboplastin time (second) >1.1*ULN1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event attributed to the study medication. A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function.

Time frame: Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with AEs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with serious AEs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with severe AEs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continue study0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with dose reduced or temporary discontinuation due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continue study0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with AEs3 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with serious AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with dose reduced or temporary discontinuation due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Treatment-related)Participants with severe AEs0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: (1) results in death; (2) is life threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) results in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that is considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to at least 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A severe AE is defined as a event interferes significantly with participant's usual function.

Time frame: Day 1 up to at least 28 days after last dose of study medication (maximum of 33 days).

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with AEs2 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with serious AEs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with severe AEs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continue study0 Participants
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with dose reduced or temporary discontinuation due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants discontinued study drug due to AEs and continue study0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with AEs3 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants discontinued from study due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with serious AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with dose reduced or temporary discontinuation due to AEs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (All-causality)Participants with severe AEs0 Participants
Secondary

Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) (Ctau) of ATM

The Ctau was observed directly from data. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionObserved Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) (Ctau) of ATM21.43 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentObserved Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) (Ctau) of ATM18.55 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24
Secondary

Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau%) of ATM

The Ae0-tau was calculated by 100\*Ae0-tau/dose, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau. The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionPercent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau%) of ATM69.68 Percent of doseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentPercent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine up to Time Tau (Ae0-tau%) of ATM53.51 Percent of doseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Secondary

Renal Clearance (CLr) of ATM

The CLr was calculated by Ae0-tau/AUC0-tau, where Ae0-tau was cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine up to time tau and AUC0-tau was area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for normal renal function (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for severe renal impairment (Cohort 2).

Time frame: In Cohort 1, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion. In Cohort 2, at predose on Day 3, during 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 hours after the start of a maintenance dose infusion.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionRenal Clearance (CLr) of ATM4.527 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentRenal Clearance (CLr) of ATM1.477 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23
Secondary

t1/2 of AVI

The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal Functiont1/2 of AVI3.188 HoursStandard Deviation 0.071391
Cohort 2: Severe Renal Impairmentt1/2 of AVI6.524 HoursStandard Deviation 1.6469
Secondary

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of ATM

The t1/2 was calculated by loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of ATM2.605 HoursStandard Deviation 0.34944
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of ATM4.902 HoursStandard Deviation 1.4286
Secondary

Time for Cmax (Tmax) of ATM

The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionTime for Cmax (Tmax) of ATM2.92 Hours
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentTime for Cmax (Tmax) of ATM2.92 Hours
Secondary

Tmax of AVI

The Tmax was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionTmax of AVI2.46 Hours
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentTmax of AVI2.92 Hours
Secondary

Vss of AVI

Vss was calculated by CL\*MRT, where CL was clearance and MRT was mean residence time.

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionVss of AVI37.37 LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentVss of AVI27.78 LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Secondary

Vz of AVI

The Vz was calculated by dose/(AUC0-tau\*kel), where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve and AUC0-tau was area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau (the dosing interval). The dosing interval (tau) was 6 hours for the normal renal function group (Cohort 1) and 8 hours for the severe renal impairment group (Cohort 2).

Time frame: Predose, 2, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours after start of a maintenance dose infusion on Day 3.

Population: The analysis population included all participants treated with study medication who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Normal Renal FunctionVz of AVI55.83 LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Cohort 2: Severe Renal ImpairmentVz of AVI30.14 LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026