Skip to content

Standard Oxygen Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Impact on Mortality of an Oxygenation Strategy Including Standard Oxygen Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04468126
Acronym
SOHO
Enrollment
1504
Registered
2020-07-13
Start date
2021-01-19
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Failure, Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, de novo respiratory failure, high-flow nasal oxygen, standard oxygen

Brief summary

First-line therapy of patients with acute respiratory failure consists in oxygen delivery through standard oxygen, high-flow nasal oxygen therapy through cannula or non-invasive ventilation. Non-invasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is not recommended. In a large randomized controlled study, high-flow nasal oxygen has been described as superior to non-invasive ventilation and standard oxygen in terms of mortality but not of intubation. Paradoxically in immunocompromised patients, high-flow nasal oxygen has not been shown to be superior to standard oxygen. To improve the level of evidence of daily clinical practice, we propose comparing high-flow nasal oxygen versus standard oxygen, in terms of mortality in all patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Interventions

Standard low flow oxygen therapy through facemask or non-rebreathing mask at least 10 L/min.

Humidified and heated oxygen with a gas flow at least 50 l/min through nasal cannula and inspired fraction of oxygen adjusted in order to maintain a SpO2 between 92 and 96%

Sponsors

Poitiers University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All consecutive patients older than 18 years with an acute hypoxemic respiratory failure will be enrolled if they meet all the following criteria: * Respiratory rate \>25 breaths/min whatever the oxygen support * Pulmonary infiltrate, * PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 mmHg * Informed consent from the patient or relatives.

Exclusion criteria

* PaCO2 \> 45 mm Hg * Need for emergent intubation: pulse oximetry \< 90% with maximum oxygen support, respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest, or Glasgow coma scale below 8 points * Hemodynamic instability defined by signs of hypoperfusion or use of vasopressors \> 0.3 µg/kg/min * Glasgow coma scale equal to or below 12 points * Exacerbation of chronic lung disease including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (grade 3 or 4 of Gold classification), or another chronic lung disease with long term oxygen or ventilatory support * Cardiogenic pulmonary edema as main reason for acute respiratory failure * Coronavirus SARS-2 infection as reason for acute respiratory failure (the SOHO-COVID study has been completed) * Post-extubation respiratory failure within 7 days after extubation, * Post-operative patients within 7 days after abdominal or cardiothoracic surgery, * Do not intubate order; * Already included in the study, refusal to participate or participation in another interventional study with the same primary outcome. * Patients without any healthcare insurance scheme or not benefiting from it through a third party, * Persons under law protection, namely minors, pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality at 28 days after randomizationDay 28Death between randomization and 28 days after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failure of the oxygenation strategy between randomization and D28Day 28Intubation between randomization and D28
Mortality in ICU, in hospital, and day 90Day 90Death between randomization and end of stay in ICU, hospital. Death between randomization and day 90.
Number of ventilation free days at Day 28Day 28days alive and without intubation between day 1 and day 28
Duration of ICU and hospital stayDay 90ICU and hospital stay between randomisation and end of stay in ICU and hospital
Complications during the ICU stayDay 90Complications during the ICU stay include: septic shock, nosocomial pneumonia, cardiac arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest.
DyspneaHour 1feeling is evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, indicating marked improvement (+2), slight improvement (+1), no change (0), slight deterioration (-1) and marked deterioration (-2)
ComfortHour [1;6]comfort is evaluated using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, from 0, i.e. "no discomfort", to100, i.e. "maximal imaginable discomfort"
Level of oxygenationHour [1;6]Oxygenation is assessed by arterial blood gas sample
Organ Failure during the 48 hours after intubation.Day 28Organ failure is evaluated by the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score during the 48 hours after intubation.
Duration between the time when prespecified criteria of intubation are met and intubationDay 28interval between the time when prespecified criteria of intubation are met and intubation
Duration between treatment initiation and intubationDay 28Interval between treatment initiation and intubation

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJean-Pierre FRAT, PhD

CHU Poitiers

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026