Skip to content

TACE Combined With PD-1 Knockout Engineered T Cell in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Safety and Effect Assessment of TACE in Combination With Autologous PD-1 Knockout Engineered T Cells by Percutaneous Infusion in the Paitents With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04417764
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-06-05
Start date
2019-06-20
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

CRISPR Cas 9, TACE, PD-1 knockout engineered T cells, Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, Locally administered treatment

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)combined with percutaneous transhepatic PD-1 knockout engineered T cell infusion in the Paitents with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Blood and tissue samples will also be collected for research purposes.

Detailed description

This is a clinical study to investigate the safety and effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with PD-1 knockout engineered T cells in the Paitents with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. TACE would block the blood supply of the tumor to achieve ischemic, hypoxic andnecrotic effects. The PD-1 knockout engineered T cells were also prepared from autologous origin using CRISPR Cas9 technology. The patients performed one TACE treatment followed by 3 cycles of PD-1 edited T cells by percutaneous infusion in the peripheral of tumor under the guide of CT every four weeks. The safety and clinical efficacy will be evaluated. biomarkers and immunological markers will be monitored.

Interventions

PROCEDURETranscatheter arterial chemoembolization

The patients are plan to operated by Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE).

The PD-1 knockout engineered T cells are prepared from autologous origin using CRISPR Cas9 technology. The patients are plan to receive 3 or more cycles of PD-1 knockout engineered T cells infusion by percutaneous fine needle liver puncture with a 4-weeks interval. A total of 1 to 3× 10\^9 PD-1 edited T cells will be infused each cycle. Patients continued receiving treatment unless they had unacceptable adverse effects, or progressive disease confirmed by CT or they withdrew consent.

Sponsors

Central South University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma; 2. More than 18 years old; 3. Patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma by histopathology or imagings; 4. Liver function ChildPugh ≤7 points, Physical strength score ECOG-pts 0-1 points; 5. Maximum tumor diameter ≤10cm, tumor number ≤10, no vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis; 6. Other organs of the whole body function well; 7. Sign the informed consent; 8. Passed the review by the ethics committee.

Exclusion criteria

1. Less than 18 or more than 70 years old; 2. Lack of autonomous decision-making ability; 3. ECOG score \>2, cachexia or multiple organ failure; 4. Metastases; The tumor was diffuse or metastasized widely and the expected survival time was less than 3 months. 5. Uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction with a history of bleeding; Organ transplant; 6. Patients with severe autoimmune diseases; Iodine contrast agent allergy; High allergic constitution; 7. The main portal vein was completely blocked by cancer embolism, with little collateral vascular formation; 8. Severe infection; AIDS, syphilis infection; 9. T cell lymphoma; 10. Patients with mental illness, severe trauma or other stress conditions; 11. Pregnant or nursing women; 12. Abnormal peripheral blood routine detection; 13. Failing to comply with the study protocol to complete the diagnosis and treatment project; Failed ethics committee review.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Adverse Eventsup to 2 yearsNumber of participants with Adverse Events using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.03) in patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response Rateup to 12 monthsTo evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) ,refers to the proportion of patients whose tumors shrink to a certain extent and remain unchanged for a certain period of time, including patients with CR+PR.Tumors are assessed at baseline, the 8th week, the 16th week,the 24th week, and once every 12 weeks during the treatment and follow-up period per RECIST1.1.
Time to First Responseup to 2 yearsTo evaluate time to first response, defined as the time from the first cell infusion to the first observed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
Duration of Responseup to 2 yearsTo evaluate the duration of response (DOR), defined as the time from the first observed CR or PR to the first observed PD or death from any cause.
Progression Free Survivalup to 2 yearsTo evaluate the progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the first cell infusion to the first observed PD or death from any cause.
Overall Survivalup to 2 yearsTo evaluate the overall survival (OS), defined as the time from the first cell infusion to death.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWei Wang, MD
cjr.wangwei@vip.163.com86-0731-88618411

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026