Skip to content

Bread Study: Comparison of the Tolerance of Spelt and Wheat Bread

Comparison of the Tolerance of Spelt and Wheat Bread in Humans With Suspected NCWS Considering Different Manufacturing Processes of Bread

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04401956
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-05-26
Start date
2020-05-15
Completion date
2021-09-07
Last updated
2021-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity, Wheat Intolerance

Keywords

Human Nutrition, NCWS, Spelt, Wheat Bread

Brief summary

This project aims to verify the hypothesis that spelt products are more tolerable than bread wheat products in a target group of individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity. In addition, the influence of different manufacturing processes will be considered.

Detailed description

Wheat cereals are known to be capable of triggering wheat allergy and celiac disease. The prevalence of both diseases is about 1%. Recently, another clinical entity was described, the non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). The origin and mechanisms of NCWS are unclear at present, but the existence of this new disease entity has been proven by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge tests. Three different grain components have been proposed as triggers of NCWS, gluten, α-amylase trypsin inhibitors or fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs). It is reported that individuals with self-diagnosed NCWS quite often tolerate spelt products much better, even though spelt shows a higher gluten content than bread wheat products. Therefore, the question arises whether this putative spelt tolerance can be confirmed on an objective basis and whether the underlying molecular mechanisms can be elucidated. So far, human study addressing such questions are lacking. This project aims to verify the hypothesis that spelt products are more tolerable than bread wheat products in a target group of individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity. In addition, the influence of different manufacturing processes on wheat sensitivity will be revealed. For this purpose, the trial involves individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity and spelt tolerance. Six different kinds of bread will be tested, including 4 wheat and spelt breads, each of them produced following a traditional or a conventional way. Aim of this part is to objective bread wheat and spelt intolerance in a defined population. To find out whether FODMAPs or gluten affect the tolerance of bread, two additional breads will be tested, a gluten-free bread with added gluten and a gluten-free bread with added FODMAPs.

Interventions

OTHERbread

Different types of bread

Sponsors

University of Hohenheim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 ≤70 years * Signed declaration of consent * Willingness to adhere to the prescribed diet for the duration of the study * Subjective bread wheat intolerance * No known spelled intolerance * No acute or chronic gastrointestinal diseases (e.g. celiac disease / wheat allergy) * No participation in another clinical trial (current or within the past 30 days) * Gluten-containing diet at least 6 weeks before the start of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Taking intestinal therapeutics, antibiotics, immunosuppressants or similar * Pregnancy / lactation * Relevant violations of the nutritional protocol * Occurrence of relevant diseases (possibly individual decision) * Revocation of consent * Accommodation in a clinic or similar facility based on an official or judicial order

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of IBS-SSS Total scoreStudy examinations are at baseline, after wash out phases (day 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 38) and after bread intervention phases (day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42).)IBS-SSS Total score will be collected with a questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extraintestinal SymptomsStudy examinations are at baseline, after wash out phases (day 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 38) and after bread intervention phases (day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42).)The study team will ask the participants for typical extraintestinal symptoms in NCWS like headache, foggy-mind, nausea, heartburn, exhaustion
Blood and fecal markersStudy examinations are at baseline and after bread intervention phases (day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42).Change of blood- and fecal markers that will reveal inflammation or intestinal permeability (Anti-gliadin Immunglobulin G antibody, lipase, ferritin, zonulin, calprotectin and lactoferrin)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026