Skip to content

The Role of Stress Neuromodulators in Decision Making Under Risk and Selective Attention to Threat

The Role of Stress Neuromodulators in Decision Making Under Risk

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04359147
Acronym
SID
Enrollment
167
Registered
2020-04-24
Start date
2019-11-01
Completion date
2021-12-22
Last updated
2022-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Yohimbine, Hydrocortisone, Yohimbine + Hydrocortisone, Placebo

Brief summary

Incidental affective states, i.e., affective states can influence decision making and selective attention to threatening information. Acute stress is such an affective state and is a powerful contextual modulator of decision-making processes and selective attention to threat. In terms of physiological and neurohormonal changes, the stress response has been well characterized: Exposure to stress elicits an array of autonomic, endocrine, and behavioral responses. The physiological stress response is mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the locus coeruleus noradrenergic (LC-NA) system with cortisol and norepinephrine (NE) as their end products. There is compelling evidence that the stress hormones cortisol and NE influence cognitive processes. However, only very few studies so far used pharmacological approaches to specify the role of stress neuromodulators on decision making and selective attention to threat and these studies are hardly comparable due to differences in the experimental design, e.g., the decision making task used. Furthermore, the neural underpinnings of stress effects on decision making and selective attention to threat are uninvestigated so far. The aim of the proposed project is to clarify the role of the major stress neuromodulators, NE and cortisol, in their contribution to different processes related to decision making under risk and selective attention to threat. To this end, combined precise pharmacological stimulation, behavioral modeling, and fMRI methods will be applied to systematically disentangle the effects of stress hormones on risk attitudes and loss aversion as well as their relation to neural correlates of processing subjective value and risk. Using pharmacological manipulation, the influence of noradrenergic and glucocorticoid activity on decision making under risk at the behavioral, computational, and neural level will be investigated. In addition, the influence of noradrenergic and glucocorticoid activity on selective attention to threat at the behavioural and neural level using a dot-probe paradigm with fearful and neutral faces will be examined. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four groups: (A) yohimbine, (B) hydrocortisone, (C) yohimbine and hydrocortisone, or (D) placebo.

Interventions

Effects on neural correlates of decision-making under risk and selective attention to threat

DRUGHydrocortisone

Effects on neural correlates of decision-making under risk and selective attention to threat

Effects on neural correlates of decision-making under risk and selective attention to threat

DRUGPlacebo

Effects on neural correlates of decision-making under risk and selective attention to threat

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Right-handed * High-school diploma

Exclusion criteria

* Former and present DSM-5 axis I disorders according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) * Permanent medication of any kind * Medical conditions associated with adrenal dysfunction or well-known impact on HPA activity or cognitive function * Steroid use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response45 + 12 minutesIn both tasks
Risk and loss-aversion, choice consistency45 minutesBehavioural outcome of the decision-making under risk task modeled using prospect theory (PT)
Patch-leaving times45 minutesBehavioural outcome of the decision-making under risk task including a foraging task part using marginal value theory
Attentional bias to fearful faces12 minutesBehavioural outcome of the dot-probe task

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Salivary cortisol3 hoursTreatment check
Salivary alpha amylase3 hoursTreatment check
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure3 hoursTreatment check
Heart rate3 hoursTreatment check

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026