Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Conditions
Keywords
upper airway, pharynx, collapsibility, compliance, drug-induced sleep endoscopy, hypoglossal stimulation
Brief summary
The current study is designed to examine underlying mechanisms of action of lingual muscles in the maintenance of airway patency during sleep. The investigators' major hypothesis is that specific tongue muscles are responsible for relieving upper airway obstruction during sleep.
Detailed description
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent upper airway obstruction due to inadequate muscle tone during sleep leading to nocturnal hypercapnia, repeated oxyhemoglobin desaturations and arousals. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the therapeutic mainstay for OSA, but adherence remains poor. The loss of motor input to the tongue during sleep has been implicated as a cause for upper airway collapse. Activation of tongue muscles with implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulators is an effective therapy for some OSA patients. Nevertheless, approximately 1/3 of OSA patients did not respond to hypoglossal nerve stimulation despite rigorous selection criteria, leaving large segments of CPAP intolerant patients at risk for OSA-related morbidity. Thus, there is a critical knowledge gap in the role of lingual muscle activity in the maintenance of airway patency. The current study is designed to examine underlying mechanisms of action of lingual muscles in the maintenance of airway patency during sleep. The investigators' major hypothesis is that specific tongue muscles are responsible for relieving upper airway obstruction during sleep. To address this hypothesis, the investigators will (1) selectively stimulate specific lingual muscle groups (viz., protrudors and retractors) and measure effects on airway patency during Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE). The investigators will (2) correlate responses in patency to alterations in tongue morphology (as assessed with ultrasound imaging). The investigators will (3) examine the impact of anatomic factors (e.g., the size of the maxillo-mandibular enclosure) on airway responses to stimulation. Patients will (4) undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determine the extent to which maxillo-mandibular size and tongue size and fat content compress pharyngeal structures. The investigators will (5) assess apnea severity and hypoglossal nerve stimulation with Inspire to measure response to therapy via split-night PSGs. The investigators will (6) examine digital morphometrics to quantify pharyngeal anatomy. A final goal is to (7) measure tongue force, as tongue force measurements may elucidate mechanisms of therapy response as related to neuromuscular control. The study will contain two distinct pathways, Study A and Study B, in order to efficiently execute the protocol. Study A will focus primarily on measurements obtained as part of routine clinical care. Study B will focus on enhanced imaging and physiology techniques in patients using lingual muscle stimulation (Inspire). Study A: * To determine the contribution of defects in upper airway function to the pathogenesis of airway obstruction at specific sites of pharyngeal collapse by characterizing upper airway pressure-flow/area relationships during DISE. * To determine the impact of jaw thrust and mouth closure maneuvers to functional determinants of upper airway obstruction at specific sites of pharyngeal collapse. * To examine effects of maxillo-mandibular restriction and tongue size on upper airway functional properties during DISE. Study B (In addition to the objectives for Study A): * To assess effects of stimulating specific lingual muscles on upper airway patency during natural sleep and drug-induced sleep * To assess whether craniofacial morphology predicts improvements in pharyngeal patency during sleep with stimulation.
Interventions
On/off responses will be assessed both during Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) and Polysomnography (PSG).
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Participants and investigators are aware of intervention status.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Study A Inclusion Criteria: • Scheduled to undergo DISE as part of routine clinical standard of care. Study B Inclusion Criteria: * Adults (≥ 22yrs) willing and capable of providing informed consent * Implanted with the MRI-conditional Inspire hypoglossal nerve stimulator (Model 3028 or later) * Compliant with Inspire therapy (\> 20 hours/week over 2+ weeks) as a standalone treatment for sleep-disordered breathing * Inspire remote model 2500 or later. Study B
Exclusion criteria
* MRI contraindications (claustrophobia, ferromagnetic implants/foreign bodies, etc.) * Inspire Implant Model 3024 * Inspire Remote Model 3032 * Patients who have fallen asleep while during resulting in an accident or "near miss" accident within 1 year prior to device implantation. * Inability to sleep in the supine position (by self-report) * History of severe difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep in the laboratory * Pregnant women
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pharyngeal Critical Pressure (Pcrit) | Collected during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (<1 day). | Upper airway collapsibility (Pcrit, cmH₂O): Pressure at which the upper airway closes during inspiration, with a higher value indicating greater collapsibility. Pcrit less than zero indicates that the airway remains open. Pcrit greater than or equal to zero indicates that the airway is closed. |
| Pharyngeal Opening Pressure (PhOP) | Collected during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (<1 day). | Measurement of upper airway collapsibility (cmH2O) |
| Pharyngeal Compliance | Unable to be determined | Pressure-area relationships |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of Pennsylvania
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 |
| Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) | 31.2 events/hr STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1 |
| BMI | 29.3 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 125 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 77 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 100 | 0 / 32 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 100 | 0 / 32 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 100 | 0 / 32 |