Skip to content

Treatment With Human Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Severe Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Human Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04288102
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-02-28
Start date
2020-03-05
Completion date
2020-07-09
Last updated
2020-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Corona Virus Disease 2019(COVID-19)

Brief summary

COVID-19 caused clusters of severe respiratory illness and was associated with 2% mortality. No specific anti-viral treatment exists. The mainstay of clinical management is largely symptomatic treatment, with organ support in intensive care for seriously ill patients. Cellular therapy, using mesenchymal stem cells has been shown to reduce nonproductive inflammation and affect tissue regeneration and is being evaluated in patients with ARDS. This clinical trial is to inspect the safety and efficiency of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for severe COVID-19.

Detailed description

The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has unprecedentedly spread in the worldwide and been declared as a pandemic by the world health organization. COVID-19 is characterized by sustained cytokines production and hyper-inflammation, can cause clusters of severe respiratory illness with a fatality rate around 2-5%. There are currently no prophylactic vaccine and no specific antiviral treatment agents available recommended for COVID-19. Therefore, it is urgent to find a safe and effective therapeutic approach to COVID-19. During the last decade, the promising features of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), including their regenerative properties and ability to differentiate into diverse cell lineages, have generated great interest among researchers whose work has offered intriguing perspectives on cell-based therapies for various diseases. These findings seem to highlight that the beneficial effect of MSC-based treatment could be principally due by the immunomodulation and regenerative potential of these cells. MSCs could significantly reduce the pathological changes of lung and inhibit the cell-mediated immune inflammatory response induced by influenza virus in animal model . MSCs has been shown to reduce nonproductive inflammation and affect tissue regeneration and is being evaluated in patients with ARDS. Our phase I preliminary data of parallel assignment study(NCT04252118) showed that three doses of MSCs was safe in patients with COVID-19. Randomized control trial is needed to assess efficacy and safety. The investigators will do a prospective, double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial to assess treatment with three intravenous doses of MSCs compared with placebo. 90 severe COVID-19 patients will be recruited in China. 60 patients will receive i.v. transfusion 3 times of MSCs (4.0\*10E7 cells per time) and the standard of care as the treated group. In addition, the 30 patients will receive placebo and standard of care as control group. Change in lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, day28 and 90, change in consolidation/ ground-glass lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, 28 and 90, time to clinical improvement in 28 days, mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) dyspnea scale, 6-minute walk test, maximum vital capacity (VCmax), Diffusing Capacity (DLCO), oxygen saturation, oxygenation index, duration of oxygen therapy, side effects, immunological characteristics (immune cells, inflammatory factors, etc.) will be evaluated during the 90 days follow up.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALUC-MSCs

3 does of UC-MSCs(4.0\*10E7 cells per time) intravenously at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6.

3 does of placebo(intravenously at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6)

Sponsors

Huoshenshan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province
CollaboratorOTHER
The General Hospital of Central Theater Command
CollaboratorOTHER
Vcanbio Cell and Gene Engineering Corp., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Beijing 302 Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, aged at 18 years (including) -75 years old 2. Hospitalized 3. Laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from any diagnostic sampling source 4. Pneumonia that is judged by computed tomography 5. In accordance with any one of the following : 1)dyspnea (RR ≥ 30 times / min), 2)finger oxygen saturation ≤ 93% in resting state, 3)arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) / oxygen absorption concentration (FiO2) ≤ 300MMHG, 4)pulmonary imaging shows that the focus progress \> 50% in 24-48 hours 6. Interstitial lung damage is judged by computed tomography.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy, lactation and those who are not pregnant but do not take effective contraceptives measures; 2. Patients with malignant tumor, other serious systemic diseases and psychosis; 3. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials; 4. Inability to provide informed consent or to comply with test requirements. 5. Co-Infection of HIV, tuberculosis, influenza virus, adenovirus and other respiratory infection virus. 6. Invasive ventilation 7. Shock 8. Combined with other organ failure( need organ support) 9. Interstitial lung damage caused by other reasons ( in 2 weeks) 10. The pulmonary imaging revealed the interstitial damage of lungs before the COVID-19 confirmed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 28.Day 28Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in consolidation lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, 28 and 90.Day 10, Day 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Change in ground-glass lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, 28 and 90.Day 10, Day 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Pulmonary fibrosis - related morphological features in CT scan at day 90 a. cord-like shadow b. honeycomb-like shadows c. interlobular septal thickening d. intralobular interstitial thickening e. pleural thickeningDay 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Lung densitometry: Change in total voxel 'weight' in lesion area voxel 'weight'=voxel density (in HU) × voxel volume (in voxel)Day 10, Day 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Lung densitometry: volumes histogram of lung density distribution (<-750, -750~-300, -300~50, >50) at day 10, 28 and 90.Day 10, Day 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Time to clinical improvement in 28 days.Day 28Clinical improvement defined as a one-point deduction from baseline in a 6 ordinal scale: 1. Not hospitalized; 2. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 3. Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 6. Death.
Oxygenation index( PaO2/FiO2)Day 6, Day 10, Day 28Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Duration of oxygen therapy(days)Day 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Blood oxygen saturationDay 6, Day 10, Day 28Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Change in lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10 and 90Day 10, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Maximum vital capacity (VCmax)Baseline, Day 10, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)Baseline, Day 10, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement
mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) dyspnea scaleDay 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement No limitation of activities, discharged from hospital =Score 1; Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy=Score 2; Oxygen by mask or nasal prongs-Score 3; Non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen=Score 4; Mechanical ventilation or ECMO=Score 5; Death=Score 6.
Changes of absolute lymphocyte counts and subsets from baseline to day 6, 10, 28 and 90.Day 6, Day 10, Day 28, Day 90Marker of Immunological function
Changes of cytokine/chemokine levels from baseline to day 6, 10, 28 and 90.Day 6, Day 10, Day 28, Day 90Marker of Immunological function
Adverse eventsDay 0 through Day 90Safety endpoints
Serious adverse eventsDay 0 through Day 90Safety endpoints
All-cause mortalityDay 0 through Day 90Safety endpoints
6-minute walk testDay 28, Day 90Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026