Skip to content

Ertugliflozin for Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy of Ertugliflozin on Reduction of Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation Secondary to Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04231331
Acronym
EFFORT
Enrollment
128
Registered
2020-01-18
Start date
2020-11-04
Completion date
2023-11-15
Last updated
2025-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Brief summary

In patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular (LV) dilation, adverse LV remodeling causes tethering of mitral valve (MV) preventing sufficient coaptation of normal leaflets and resulting in functional MR. Because secondary functional MR usually develops as a result of LV dysfunction, guideline-directed medical therapy for HF forms the mainstay of therapy. However, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) fail to reverse adverse LV remodeling and functional MR, and the morbidity and mortality of patients with functional MR remain high despite standard medical therapy. Randomized trials to explore cardiovascular (CV) benefit of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor have been performed and showed a significant reduction on the risk of CV death or hospitalization for HF. However, its effect on cardiac structure and function was not evaluated and further mechanistic studies are needed to interpret beneficial clinical effects of the SGLT2 inhibitors. Based on studies demonstrating SGLT2 inhibitors' favorable effects on LV modeling, investigators hypothesize that SGLT2 inhibitor, ertugliflozin, is effective on improving MR in patients with functional MR secondary to LV dysfunction and try to examine this hypothesis in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparison study using echocardiography.

Detailed description

In patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular (LV) dilation, adverse LV remodeling causes tethering of mitral valve (MV) preventing sufficient coaptation of normal leaflets and resulting in functional MR. Because secondary functional MR usually develops as a result of LV dysfunction, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF forms the mainstay of therapy. However, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) fail to reverse adverse LV remodeling and functional MR, and the morbidity and mortality of patients with functional MR remain high despite standard medical therapy. A recent randomized trial (COAPT) proved that reduction of functional MR by transcatheter MV repair resulted in a lower rate of hospitalization for HF and lower mortality in patients with HF and significant secondary MR, but more than two-thirds of such patients either died or were hospitalized for HF within 5 years. Thus, optimization of GDMT for timely reduction of functional MR is important, because the persistence of severe functional MR despite GDMT contributes to a vicious cycle of deterioration and leads to irreversible LV dysfunction and a poorer prognosis. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce cardiac preload and afterload by natriuresis and lowering arterial stiffness, similar to the neprilysin inhibitor that facilitates sodium excretion and has vasodilating effects. Randomized trials to explore cardiovascular (CV) benefit of the SGLT2 inhibitor have been performed and showed a significant reduction on the risk of CV death or hospitalization for HF. Based on remarkable outcomes of recent clinical trials, SGLT2 inhibitors are recommended for HF with reduced EF and can be beneficial in HF with preserved EF. These outcome trials of SGLT2 inhibitors did not examine their effects on cardiac structure and function, and small imaging trials reported conflicting results in terms of the effect of a SGLT2 inhibitor on LV remodeling in patients with HFrEF and diabetes. Despite current recommendations of SGLT2 inhibitors for HF, SGLT2 inhibitors are rarely used in patients with HF with functional MR, as shown in the COAPT trial, because their effects on cardiac remodeling and functional MR are uncertain. The EFFORT trial (Ertugliflozin for Functional Mitral Regurgitation) was designed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the SGLT2 inhibitor, ertugliflozin, on functional MR. The major hypothesis of this trial was that ertugliflozin would be superior to placebo in reducing functional MR associated with HF with mildly or moderately reduced EF.

Interventions

Ertugliflozin 5mg qd for 12 months

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo qd for 12 months

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must agree to the study protocol and provide written informed consent * Outpatients ≥ 20 years of age, male or female * Non-diabetic or type2 DM patients with HbA1c 7.0-10.5% * Patients with secondary functional MR (stage B and C) and LV dysfunction * Symptoms due to coronary ischemia or heart failure may be present but symptoms due to MR should be absent * Normal mitral valve leaflets and chords * Regional or global wall motion abnormalities with mild or severe tethering of leaflet * MR whose ERO \> 0.10 cm2 and which lasted \> 6 months under medical treatment with a β-blocker and an ACE inhibitor (or ARB) * 35% \< LV ejection fraction \< 50% * Dyspnea of NYHA functional class II or III * Titration of HF medications should be completed and patients must take a stable, optimized dose of a β-blocker and an ACE inhibitor (or ARB) for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry

Exclusion criteria

* History of hypersensitivity or allergy to the study drug, drugs of similar chemical classes, or SGLT-2 as well as known or suspected contraindications to the study drug * Current use or prior use of a SGLT-2 inhibitor or combined SGLT-1 and 2 inhibitor * Known history of angioedema * Any evidence of structural mitral valve disease, including prolapse of mitral leaflets and rupture of chords or papillary muscles * Current acute decompensated heart failure or dyspnea of NYHA functional class IV * Medical history of hospitalization within 6 weeks * Symptomatic hypotension and/or a SBP \< 100 mmHg at screening * Estimated GFR \< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 * History of ketoacidosis * Evidence of hepatic disease as determined by any one of the following: AST or ALT values exceeding 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening visit (Visit 0), history of hepatic encephalopathy, history of esophageal varices, or history of portacaval shunt. * Acute coronary syndrome, stroke, major CV surgery, PCI within 3 months * Substantial myocardial ischemia requiring coronary revascularization, a plan of coronary revascularization or mitral valve intervention within 1 year * Indication of cardiac resynchronization therapy, a plan of heart transplantation or implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy * History of severe pulmonary disease * Significant aortic valve disease * Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using a barrier method plus a hormonal method * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women * Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of EROABaseline and 12 monthsChange of effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) of functional mitral regurgitation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of End-systolic Volume IndexBaseline and 12 monthsLeft ventricular end-systolic volume was measured with the use of echocardiography. Left ventricular end-systolic volume index was obtained by dividing end-systolic volume by body surface area.
Change of End-diastolic Volume IndexBaseline and 12 monthsLeft ventricular end-diastolic volume was measured with the use of echocardiography. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index was obtained by dividing end-diastolic volume by body surface area.
Change of Regurgitant VolumeBaseline and 12 monthsChange of regurgitant volume of functional mitral regurgitation
Change of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal StrainBaseline and 12 monthsMyocardial strain is a measure of percenage shortening of myocardium. Myocardial strain measurement was performed with a semiautomated alogithm using speckle-tracking echocardiogrphy. Measurements of eft ventricular global longitudinal strain were made in the 3 standard apical views and averaged.
Change of LA End-systolic Volume IndexBaseline and 12 monthsLeft atrial end-systolic volume was measured with the use of echocardiography. Left atrial end-systolic volume index was obtained by dividing end-systolic volume by body surface area.
Change of NT-proBNPBaseline and 12 monthsChange of NT-proBNP (N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide)

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle, where all randomized patients were included in the group to which they were originally allocated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo
65
Ertugliflozin
Ertugliflozin
63
Total128

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboErtugliflozinTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants13 Participants28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
50 Participants50 Participants100 Participants
Age, Continuous67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Atrial fibrillation32 Participants33 Participants65 Participants
Diabetes9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants23 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants40 Participants78 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 650 / 63
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 650 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 651 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Change of EROA

Change of effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) of functional mitral regurgitation

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: Primary analysis included all 114 patients who completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange of EROA0.03 square cmStandard Deviation 0.12
ErtugliflozinChange of EROA-0.05 square cmStandard Deviation 0.06
Comparison: Based on our previous study, we assumed a common baseline mean EROA of 0.21 cm2 with a common standard deviation of 0.11 cm2. Given these assumptions, we calculated that a sample size of 204 patients randomly assigned to two groups, would provide 90% power to detect a difference of 0.05 cm2 in the EROA between the ertugliflozin and placebo groups, using a two-sided t test with an alpha level of 0.05.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change of End-diastolic Volume Index

Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was measured with the use of echocardiography. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index was obtained by dividing end-diastolic volume by body surface area.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange of End-diastolic Volume Index-5.7 mL/square mStandard Deviation 17.2
ErtugliflozinChange of End-diastolic Volume Index-4.7 mL/square mStandard Deviation 11
Secondary

Change of End-systolic Volume Index

Left ventricular end-systolic volume was measured with the use of echocardiography. Left ventricular end-systolic volume index was obtained by dividing end-systolic volume by body surface area.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange of End-systolic Volume Index-3.6 mL/square mStandard Deviation 13.4
ErtugliflozinChange of End-systolic Volume Index-4.1 mL/square mStandard Deviation 8.1
Secondary

Change of LA End-systolic Volume Index

Left atrial end-systolic volume was measured with the use of echocardiography. Left atrial end-systolic volume index was obtained by dividing end-systolic volume by body surface area.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange of LA End-systolic Volume Index3.2 mL/square mStandard Deviation 17.7
ErtugliflozinChange of LA End-systolic Volume Index-2.8 mL/square mStandard Deviation 13.8
Secondary

Change of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain

Myocardial strain is a measure of percenage shortening of myocardium. Myocardial strain measurement was performed with a semiautomated alogithm using speckle-tracking echocardiogrphy. Measurements of eft ventricular global longitudinal strain were made in the 3 standard apical views and averaged.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain0.10 percent change of myocardial lengthStandard Deviation 2.68
ErtugliflozinChange of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain-1.34 percent change of myocardial lengthStandard Deviation 2.57
Secondary

Change of NT-proBNP

Change of NT-proBNP (N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide)

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange of NT-proBNP126 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1112
ErtugliflozinChange of NT-proBNP-154 pg/mLStandard Deviation 815
Secondary

Change of Regurgitant Volume

Change of regurgitant volume of functional mitral regurgitation

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange of Regurgitant Volume39.3 mLStandard Deviation 31.1
ErtugliflozinChange of Regurgitant Volume24.6 mLStandard Deviation 14.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026