Skip to content

A Study to Test the Combination of Tiotropium and Olodaterol Using the Respimat® Inhaler in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Who Have Different Abilities to Inhale

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy of Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol, Fixed Dose Combination (5 mcg/5mcg) vs. Placebo Delivered by Respimat Inhaler in Patients With Moderate to Severe COPD, Stratified by Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate [TRONARTO].

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04223843
Enrollment
213
Registered
2020-01-10
Start date
2020-01-08
Completion date
2020-09-29
Last updated
2021-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Brief summary

To demonstrate the efficacy of inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol via Respimat® on lung function in patients with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with optimal and sub-optimal Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate (PIFR). Disease severity (moderate to severe) is based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines (GOLD 2 - 3)

Interventions

Oral Inhalation

DRUGPlacebo

Oral Inhalation

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with International Council on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation prior to admission to the trial. * Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older. * All patients must have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and must meet the following spirometric criteria: patients with a post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) \>30% and \<80% of predicted normal (European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), \[R94-1408\]); and a postbronchodilator FEV1/ Functional Residual Capacity (FVC) \<70%, at the screening visit. * Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack years * Patients should meet the peak inspiratory flow rate criteria (optimal or sub-optimal) at the time of randomization depending on which strata is available for inclusion in the study. * Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the patient information. * Patients are expected to be able to perform, according to investigator's judgment, all trial related procedures including: * Technically acceptable pulmonary function tests (spirometry) * Use of In-Check DIAL G16 device to measure peak inspiratory flow rate. * Inhale medication in a competent manner (in the opinion of the investigator) from the Respimat® device * Perform technically acceptable body plethysmography measurements. This is applicable only to patients who will consent to the optional trial procedure at the selected sites.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a significant disease other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; a significant disease defined as a disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, and referring to the warnings to be observed as quoted in the locally applicable SmPC or prescribing information, could (i) put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial, (ii) influence the results of the trial, or (iii) cause concern regarding the patient's ability to participate in the trial. * Patients who have had a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation that required treatment with antibiotics, systemic steroids (oral or intravenous) or hospitalization in the 6 weeks prior to screening visit or during the screening period. * Patients who experienced two or more moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (exacerbation that required treatment with antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids), or one or more exacerbation leading to hospitalization within a year prior to visit 1. * Patients with a history of asthma. For patients with allergic rhinitis or atopy, source documentation is required to verify that the patient does not have asthma. * Patients taking inhaled corticosteroids (including combinations, e.g. inhaled corticosteroids / Long-Acting β2-agonist) in the 6 months prior to screening visit. * Patients being treated with oral corticosteroid medication due to reasons other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation within 6 weeks prior to the screening visit. * Patients who have completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the 6 weeks prior to screening visit or patients who are currently in a pulmonary rehabilitation program. * Further criteria apply

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) After 4 Weeks of Treatment.At baseline and at week 4: 10 minutes (min) prior and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min and 1 hour (h), 2h and 3h after drug administration, respectively.FEV1 AUC0-3h was calculated as the area under the FEV1-time curve from 0 to 3h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3h) to report in liters. Mean is adjusted mean. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to test the primary endpoint. Each of the tests were considered confirmatory only if all previous tests were successful.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 4 Weeks of TreatmentAt baseline and at week 4.Change from baseline in trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) after 4 weeks of treatment.

Countries

Germany, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy of 5µg/5µg inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol (Tio+Olo) via Respimat® on lung function in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with optimal and sub-optimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR).

Pre-assignment details

Only patients that met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were included in this trial. Prior to the initiation of any trial-related procedure, all patients were informed about the trial verbally and in writing by the investigator. Each patient signed and dated an Informed Consent Form (ICF) according to the local regulatory and legal requirements.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tio+Olo (5μg/5μg) - Sub-optimal PIFR
A fixed dose combination of 5 microgram (μg)/5μg (two times 2.5µg/2.5µg) tiotropium + olodaterol (Tio+Olo) inhalation solution was administered orally once daily via Respimat inhaler in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and with sub-optimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) (\<60 Liter(L)/minute (min)) over a 4-week treatment period.
55
Matching Placebo - Sub-optimal PIFR
2 inhalation solutions of matching placebo were administered orally once daily via Respimat inhaler in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and with sub-optimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) (\<60 L/min) over a 4-week treatment period.
55
Tio+Olo (5μg/5μg ) - Optimal PIFR
A fixed dose combination of 5μg/5μg (two times 2.5µg/2.5µg) tiotropium + olodaterol (Tio+Olo) inhalation solution was administered orally once daily via Respimat inhaler in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and with sub-optimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) (≥60 L/min) over a 4-week treatment period.
51
Matching Placebo - Optimal PIFR
2 inhalation solutions of matching placebo were administered orally once daily via Respimat inhaler in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and with optimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) (≥60 L/min) over a 4-week treatment period.
52
Total213

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTio+Olo (5μg/5μg) - Sub-optimal PIFRTotalMatching Placebo - Optimal PIFRTio+Olo (5μg/5μg ) - Optimal PIFRMatching Placebo - Sub-optimal PIFR
Age, Continuous64 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79
64.96 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.25
65.88 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.43
62.80 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.48
67.05 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.54
Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 hours (AUC0-3h)1.224 Liter (L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.06
1.324 Liter (L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.467
1.523 Liter (L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.074
1.388 Liter (L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.07
1.277 Liter (L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.079
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
51 Participants203 Participants51 Participants50 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants109 Participants20 Participants24 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants104 Participants32 Participants27 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1060 / 107
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1060 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1061 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) After 4 Weeks of Treatment.

FEV1 AUC0-3h was calculated as the area under the FEV1-time curve from 0 to 3h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3h) to report in liters. Mean is adjusted mean. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to test the primary endpoint. Each of the tests were considered confirmatory only if all previous tests were successful.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 4: 10 minutes (min) prior and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min and 1 hour (h), 2h and 3h after drug administration, respectively.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): This patient set was nested within the TS and included all patients who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement for at least 1 efficacy endpoint. Only patients with non-missing endpoint results were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tio+Olo (5μg/5μg) - Sub-optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) After 4 Weeks of Treatment.0.250 Liter (L)Standard Error 0.033
Matching Placebo - Sub-optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) After 4 Weeks of Treatment.-0.086 Liter (L)Standard Error 0.031
Tio+Olo (5μg/5μg ) - Optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) After 4 Weeks of Treatment.0.333 Liter (L)Standard Error 0.032
Matching Placebo - Optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) After 4 Weeks of Treatment.0.012 Liter (L)Standard Error 0.031
Comparison: H0: There is no difference in the mean FEV1 AUC0-3 change from baseline between Tio+Olo and matching placebo.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.246, 0.425]ANCOVA
Comparison: H0: There is no difference in the mean FEV1 AUC0-3h change from baseline between Tio+Olo and matching placebo.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.233, 0.409]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 4 Weeks of Treatment

Change from baseline in trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) after 4 weeks of treatment.

Time frame: At baseline and at week 4.

Population: FAS: This patient set was nested within the TS and included all patients who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measurement for at least 1 efficacy endpoint. Only patients with non-missing endpoint results were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tio+Olo (5μg/5μg) - Sub-optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 4 Weeks of Treatment0.095 LiterStandard Error 0.031
Matching Placebo - Sub-optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 4 Weeks of Treatment-0.106 LiterStandard Error 0.03
Tio+Olo (5μg/5μg ) - Optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 4 Weeks of Treatment0.177 LiterStandard Error 0.03
Matching Placebo - Optimal PIFRChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) After 4 Weeks of Treatment-0.040 LiterStandard Error 0.029
Comparison: H0: There is no difference in the mean trough FEV1 change from baseline between Tio+Olo and matching placebo.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.117, 0.286]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: H0: There is no difference in the mean trough FEV1 change from baseline between Tio+Olo and matching placebo.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.135, 0.299]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026