Skip to content

The INVIGORATE Trial: A Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.

The INVIGORATE Trial: A Randomized, Double-masked, Crossover Design, Vehicle-controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) Compared to Vehicle in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04207736
Enrollment
95
Registered
2019-12-23
Start date
2019-12-05
Completion date
2021-02-16
Last updated
2024-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Conjunctivitis

Keywords

reproxalap, INVIGORATE, ADX-102

Brief summary

The INVIGORATE Trial: A Randomized, Double-masked, Crossover Design, Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Detailed description

The INVIGORATE Trial: A Randomized, Double-masked, Crossover Design, Vehicle-controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) Compared to Vehicle in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC).

Interventions

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) dosed in the Environmental Exposure Chamber.

DRUGVehicle Ophthalmic Solution

Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution dosed in the Environmental Exposure Chamber.

Sponsors

Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* be at least 18 years of age of either gender and any race * have at least a two-year history of moderate-to-severe ragweed-induced allergic conjunctivitis based on principal investigator's judgement * have a positive skin prick test to ragweed pollen within the past year of screening

Exclusion criteria

* known contraindication or hypersensitivities to any components of the investigational product medication or components * history of uveitis, blepharitis, dry eye syndrome, herpes simplex keratitis, or herpes zoster keratitis; * presence of any ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or active ocular inflammation (e.g., follicular conjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis) within 14 days prior to screening * presence of any chronic ocular degenerative condition or ocular inflammation that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to worsen over the course of the clinical trial; * diagnosis of moderate-to-severe pinguecula or pterygium (particularly if it results in chronic erythema), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, significant conjunctival scarring, chemical burn, herpetic or neurotrophic keratitis, Cryopyrin Associated Periodic Syndrome (CAPS), or keratoconus * woman of childbearing potential who is pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject-Reported Ocular Itching Score Assessed Over 110 to 210 Minutes in the Allergy ChamberThe efficacy assessment period was 110 to 210 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for ocular itching on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = none, 4 = severe). The treatment comparison was performed using a mixed model repeated measures approach for a crossover trial with two treatment periods. The model included time point, treatment, treatment period, treatment sequence, and interaction between time point and treatment as fixed effects, and subject nested within treatment sequence as a repeated measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conjunctival Redness Score Assessed Over 12 to 212 Minutes in the Allergy ChamberThe efficacy assessment period was 12 to 212 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for conjunctival redness on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = none, 4 = extremely severe). The treatment comparison was performed using a mixed model repeated measures approach for a crossover trial with two treatment periods. The model included time point, treatment, treatment period, treatment sequence, and interaction between time point and treatment as fixed effects, and subject nested within treatment sequence as a repeated measure.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Ninety-five subjects were randomized in a crossover design trial; efficacy was assessed in an allergy chamber.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reproxalap (0.25%), Then Vehicle
Subjects first received reproxalap ophthalmic solution twice in a single day. After a washout period of approximately two weeks, subjects then received vehicle ophthalmic solution twice in a single day.
48
Vehicle, Then Reproxalap (0.25%)
Subjects first received vehicle ophthalmic solution twice in a single day. After a washout period of approximately two weeks, subjects then received reproxalap ophthalmic solution twice in a single day.
47
Total95

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVehicle, Then Reproxalap (0.25%)TotalReproxalap (0.25%), Then Vehicle
Age, Continuous41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.13
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.41
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants89 Participants44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants17 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants55 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants53 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants42 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 910 / 93
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 916 / 93
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 910 / 93

Outcome results

Primary

Subject-Reported Ocular Itching Score Assessed Over 110 to 210 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for ocular itching on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = none, 4 = severe). The treatment comparison was performed using a mixed model repeated measures approach for a crossover trial with two treatment periods. The model included time point, treatment, treatment period, treatment sequence, and interaction between time point and treatment as fixed effects, and subject nested within treatment sequence as a repeated measure.

Time frame: The efficacy assessment period was 110 to 210 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Reproxalap (0.25%)Subject-Reported Ocular Itching Score Assessed Over 110 to 210 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber0.94 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
VehicleSubject-Reported Ocular Itching Score Assessed Over 110 to 210 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber1.38 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Conjunctival Redness Score Assessed Over 12 to 212 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for conjunctival redness on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = none, 4 = extremely severe). The treatment comparison was performed using a mixed model repeated measures approach for a crossover trial with two treatment periods. The model included time point, treatment, treatment period, treatment sequence, and interaction between time point and treatment as fixed effects, and subject nested within treatment sequence as a repeated measure.

Time frame: The efficacy assessment period was 12 to 212 minutes in the allergy chamber; baseline was pre-Dose #1 for each treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Reproxalap (0.25%)Conjunctival Redness Score Assessed Over 12 to 212 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber0.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
VehicleConjunctival Redness Score Assessed Over 12 to 212 Minutes in the Allergy Chamber0.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026