Hookworm Infections
Conditions
Keywords
Mebendazole, Chewable tablet, Hookworm, Soil-transmitted helminths, Efficacy, Safety, Acceptability
Brief summary
The rational of this study is to provide evidence on the safety and efficacy of a new chewable tablet of mebendazole compared to the standard tablet in preschool- and school-aged children infected with hookworm.
Interventions
Treatment with one of the two formulations of mebendazole. The only difference between both arms is the type of formulation of the drug: chewable versus swallowable tablet.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female children aged between 3 and 12 years; * Written informed consent signed by caregiver; * Was examined by a study physician before treatment; * Provided two stool samples at baseline; * Hookworm EPG \> 100 and at least two Kato-Katz thick smears slides with more than one hookworm egg;
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant; * Presence or history of major systemic or chronic illnesses, as assessed by a medical doctor, such as can upon initial clinical assessment; * Suffers from severe anemia (Hb \< 80 g/l); * Received anthelminthic treatment or metronidazole within past four weeks. * Attending other clinical trials during the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Geometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| CR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris Trichiura | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment. |
| Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100). |
| CR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment. |
| Cure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment. |
| Arithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100). |
| Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100). |
| Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100). |
| Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides. | Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment | Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100). |
Countries
Tanzania
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole A single 500 mg dose of the new chewable mebendazole tablets will be administered to each child in this arm.
Mebendazole: Treatment with one of the two formulations of mebendazole. The only difference between both arms is the type of formulation of the drug: chewable versus swallowable tablet. | 197 |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole A single 500 mg dose of the standard swallowable mebendazole tablets will be administered to each child in this arm.
Mebendazole: Treatment with one of the two formulations of mebendazole. The only difference between both arms is the type of formulation of the drug: chewable versus swallowable tablet. | 196 |
| Total | 393 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Total | Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 9.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 | 9.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 | 9.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2 |
| Height | 130.8 centimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 | 130.7 centimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 | 130.5 centimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 |
| Hemoglobin | 123.5 grams per liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 | 122.5 grams per liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 | 121.5 grams per liter STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 80 Participants | 167 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 116 Participants | 226 Participants | 110 Participants |
| Weight | 26.0 kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 | 25.7 kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 | 25.4 kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 197 | 0 / 196 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 14 / 197 | 15 / 196 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 197 | 0 / 196 |
Outcome results
Geometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | Geometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | 68.5 percentage change in hookworm egg counts |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Geometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | 70.8 percentage change in hookworm egg counts |
Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides | 98.7 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides | 99.8 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts |
Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura | 52.9 percentage change in T. trich egg counts |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura | 50.9 percentage change in T. trich egg counts |
Arithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | Arithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | 38.2 percentage change in hookworm egg counts |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Arithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | 28.1 percentage change in hookworm egg counts |
CR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides
Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | CR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides | 95.3 percentage of participants |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | CR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides | 97.8 percentage of participants |
CR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris Trichiura
Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | CR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris Trichiura | 9.8 percentage of participants |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | CR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris Trichiura | 7.3 percentage of participants |
Cure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against Hookworm
Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | Cure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | 12.7 percentage of participants |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Cure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against Hookworm | 11.2 percentage of participants |
Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides.
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides. | 99.9 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides. | 99.9 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts |
Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole | Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura | 73.3 percentage change in T. trich egg counts |
| Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole | Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura | 74.2 percentage change in T. trich egg counts |