Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of a New Chewable Versus the Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole Against Hookworm

Efficacy and Safety of a New Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole Versus the Swallowable, Standard Tablet of Mebendazole Against Hookworm Infections in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03995680
Acronym
CHEW_MEB_PEMBA
Enrollment
397
Registered
2019-06-24
Start date
2019-07-12
Completion date
2019-10-09
Last updated
2020-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hookworm Infections

Keywords

Mebendazole, Chewable tablet, Hookworm, Soil-transmitted helminths, Efficacy, Safety, Acceptability

Brief summary

The rational of this study is to provide evidence on the safety and efficacy of a new chewable tablet of mebendazole compared to the standard tablet in preschool- and school-aged children infected with hookworm.

Interventions

Treatment with one of the two formulations of mebendazole. The only difference between both arms is the type of formulation of the drug: chewable versus swallowable tablet.

Sponsors

Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri
CollaboratorOTHER
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female children aged between 3 and 12 years; * Written informed consent signed by caregiver; * Was examined by a study physician before treatment; * Provided two stool samples at baseline; * Hookworm EPG \> 100 and at least two Kato-Katz thick smears slides with more than one hookworm egg;

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant; * Presence or history of major systemic or chronic illnesses, as assessed by a medical doctor, such as can upon initial clinical assessment; * Suffers from severe anemia (Hb \< 80 g/l); * Received anthelminthic treatment or metronidazole within past four weeks. * Attending other clinical trials during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against HookwormBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentEggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris TrichiuraBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentCure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris TrichiuraBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentEggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).
CR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris LumbricoidesBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentCure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Cure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against HookwormBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentCure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Arithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against HookwormBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentEggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).
Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris TrichiuraBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentEggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).
Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris LumbricoidesBaseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentEggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).
Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides.Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatmentEggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).

Countries

Tanzania

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Chewable Tablet of Mebendazole
A single 500 mg dose of the new chewable mebendazole tablets will be administered to each child in this arm. Mebendazole: Treatment with one of the two formulations of mebendazole. The only difference between both arms is the type of formulation of the drug: chewable versus swallowable tablet.
197
Swallowable Tablet of Mebendazole
A single 500 mg dose of the standard swallowable mebendazole tablets will be administered to each child in this arm. Mebendazole: Treatment with one of the two formulations of mebendazole. The only difference between both arms is the type of formulation of the drug: chewable versus swallowable tablet.
196
Total393

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSwallowable Tablet of MebendazoleTotalChewable Tablet of Mebendazole
Age, Continuous9.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
9.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
9.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Height130.8 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
130.7 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
130.5 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Hemoglobin123.5 grams per liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
122.5 grams per liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
121.5 grams per liter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
80 Participants167 Participants87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
116 Participants226 Participants110 Participants
Weight26.0 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
25.7 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
25.4 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1970 / 196
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 19715 / 196
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1970 / 196

Outcome results

Primary

Geometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm

Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleGeometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm68.5 percentage change in hookworm egg counts
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleGeometric Mean Egg Reduction Rate (ERR) of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm70.8 percentage change in hookworm egg counts
Secondary

Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides

Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleArithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides98.7 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleArithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides99.8 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts
Comparison: The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ERRs and the difference between ERRs were estimated via bootstrap resampling. Superiority was claimed if the 95% confidence interval of the difference in ERRs did not include unity. Logistic regression models were used to assess efficacy in terms of CRs. In a subsequent analysis an adjusted logistic regression (adjustment for age, sex, weight and baseline infection intensity) was performed.95% CI: [-7.8, 12.6]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Arithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura

Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleArithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura52.9 percentage change in T. trich egg counts
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleArithmetic ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura50.9 percentage change in T. trich egg counts
Secondary

Arithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm

Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)\*100).

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleArithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm38.2 percentage change in hookworm egg counts
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleArithmetic ERR of the Two Formulations of Mebendazole Against Hookworm28.1 percentage change in hookworm egg counts
Secondary

CR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides

Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleCR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides95.3 percentage of participants
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleCR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides97.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

CR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris Trichiura

Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleCR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris Trichiura9.8 percentage of participants
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleCR of Both Mebendazole Regimens Against Trichuris Trichiura7.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against Hookworm

Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleCure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against Hookworm12.7 percentage of participants
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleCure Rate (CR) of Mebendazole Against Hookworm11.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides.

Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleGeometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides.99.9 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleGeometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Ascaris Lumbricoides.99.9 percentage change in A. lumbr egg counts
Secondary

Geometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura

Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))\*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the outcome measure entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)\*100).

Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) and sometime between 14 and 21 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Chewable Tablet of MebendazoleGeometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura73.3 percentage change in T. trich egg counts
Swallowable Tablet of MebendazoleGeometric ERR of Both Mebendazole Formulations Against Trichuris Trichiura74.2 percentage change in T. trich egg counts

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026