Skip to content

CRyoAblation vs AntiaRrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Trial

CRyoAblation vs AntiaRrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03716934
Acronym
craft
Enrollment
196
Registered
2018-10-23
Start date
2018-06-27
Completion date
2022-04-18
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing the relative efficacy and safety of cryoablation of PVs using the Arctic Front Advance® balloon catheter with antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with persistent AF.

Detailed description

The ablation of pulmonary veins is a very effective treatment for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The benefit of the isolation of pulmonary veins in persistent atrial fibrillation seems to be minor and the level of scientific evidence available requires additional clinical trials to define the value of ablation in this type of patients. The symptomatology of atrial fibrillation recurrences is variable among patients and among differens moments in the same patient. Pharmacological treatment and ablation have been used to reduce the symptomatology of atrial fibrillation recurrences and to increase the proportion of asymptomatic recurrences. Different forms of electrical monitoring of the heart rate are used to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention. Frequents monitoring periods provide the information of the heart rate and the effect of any intervention. The Confirm RX heart monitor® (Abbott) is a subcutaneous implantable device that provides continuous monitoring of the heart rate for more than 3 years without any effect on cardiac function. This implantable Holter automatically detects and saves atrial and ventricular arrhythmic episodes. The device can be analyzed in person or remotely, and can help to make decisions regarding anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic treatment of patients, while representing a powerful research tool for evaluate the effectiveness of different therapeutic options. This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study that compares the relative efficacy and safety of cryoablation of pulmonary veins using the Arctic Front Advance® balloon catheter with antiarrhythmic treatment in patients with persistent atrial fibrilation.

Interventions

DEVICEArctic Front Advance® balloon catheter

Cryoablation of bidirectional block of all pulmonary veins

The drug will be chosen based on the preference of the researcher / responsible physician and current clinical practice guidelines.

DEVICEConfirm RX heart monitor® (Abbott)

Is a subcutaneous implantable device that provides continuous monitoring of the heart rate for more than 3 years without any effect on cardiac function

Sponsors

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrilation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with atrial fibrilation for more than one year at baseline * Atrial fibrilation prior ablation * Age\> 75 years or \<18 years * Hyperthyroidism * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy * Severe valvular disease (stenosis or regurgitation) * Carriers of cardiac valves * Anteroposterior diameter of left atrium\> 50 mm (left parasternal long axis) * Contraindications for anticoagulation * Left atrial thrombus * Anemia * Active infection * Pregnancy * Atrial fibrilation secondary to transient, avoidable or correctable causes (hyperthyroidism, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, drugs, hydroelectrolytic alterations ...) * Life expectancy of less than 24 months * Participation in another non-purely observational study * Patients unable to understand treatment and / or study and / or providing adequate informed consent * Any condition, that in the opinion of the physician responsible for the patient, contraindicates any of the treatments of the study * Microalbuminemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival time with atrial fibrilation, auricular flutter or tachycardiaUp to 9 months.Survival time without atrial fibrilation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of more than 2 minutes duration detected by Holter
Presence of death or one major complications.first monthPresence of death or one of the following major complications: Stroke, systemic embolism, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, need for transfusion, diaphragmatic paralysis lasting more than 24 hours or causing respiratory failure, atrioesophageal fistula, stenosis of pulmonary veins, Sustained (\> 30 sec) or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia, Syncope secondary to bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias, Need for hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes or related to the study treatments, Any Serious Adverse Reaction or Serious Adverse Event related to the study treatments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patient with need to consult the emergency room or hospitalization due to cardiovascular eventsfirst monthNumber of patients that need to consult the emergency room or hospitalization due to cardiovascular events
Percentage of patients without atrial fibrilation, flutter or tachycardiafirst monthNumber of patients without atrial fibrilation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of more than 2 minutes
Percentage of patient with need for ablation or re-ablation not scheduledfirst monthNumber of patients that need a ablation or re-ablation not scheduled
Percentage of patient with need a change or suspension of antiarrhythmic due to inefficiencyfirst monthNumber of patients that need a change or suspension of antiarrhythmic due to inefficiency
Percentage of patient with cardioversionfirst monthNumber of patients that need cardioversion

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026