Skip to content

A Methodology Development Clinical Trial of Reproxalap in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber

An Exploratory Clinical Trial Evaluating Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03709121
Enrollment
70
Registered
2018-10-17
Start date
2018-10-02
Completion date
2019-03-20
Last updated
2025-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conjunctivitis, Allergic

Keywords

reproxalap, ADX-102, allergic conjunctivitis

Brief summary

An Exploratory Clinical Trial Evaluating Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) in Subjects with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC)

Interventions

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) dosed twice.

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%) dosed twice.

DRUGVehicle Ophthalmic Solution

Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution dosed twice.

Sponsors

Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* be at least 18 years of age of either gender and any race * have at least a two-year history of moderate-to-severe ragweed-induced allergic conjunctivitis based on principal investigator's judgement * have a positive skin prick test to ragweed pollen within the past year of screening

Exclusion criteria

* known contraindication or hypersensitivities to any components of the investigational product medication or components * history of uveitis, blepharitis, dry eye syndrome, herpes simplex keratitis, or herpes zoster keratitis; * presence of any ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or active ocular inflammation (e.g., follicular conjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis) within 14 days prior to screening * presence of any chronic ocular degenerative condition or ocular inflammation that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to worsen over the course of the clinical trial; * presence of any chronic ocular degenerative condition or ocular inflammation that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to worsen over the course of the clinical trial * diagnosis of moderate-to-severe pinguecula or pterygium (particularly if it results in chronic erythema), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, significant conjunctival scarring, chemical burn, herpetic or neurotrophic keratitis, Cryopyrin Associated Periodic Syndrome (CAPS), or keratoconus * woman of childbearing potential who is pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject-Reported Ocular Itching ScoreEfficacy was assessed from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber.Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular itching score from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber using a 0 -100 millimeter visual analogue scale (0 = none, 100 = severe) was assessed. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline included itching score as a dependent variable, treatment, period, and interaction of treatment and period as fixed effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject-Reported Ocular Tearing ScoreEfficacy was assessed from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber.Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular tearing score from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber using a 4-point scale (0 = none, 3 = severe) was assessed. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline included itching score as a dependent variable, treatment, period, and interaction of treatment and period as fixed effects.
Investigator-Assessed Conjunctival Redness ScoreEfficacy was assessed from 0 to 210 minutes in the allergen chamber.Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for investigator-assessed conjunctival redness from 0 to 210 minutes in the allergen chamber using a 9-point scale with half unit increments (0 = normal, 4 = prominent) was assessed. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline included itching score as a dependent variable, treatment, period, and interaction of treatment and period as fixed effects.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Seventy subjects were randomized in a three-way crossover design trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reproxalap (0.25%), Then Reproxalap (0.5%), Then Vehicle
Reproxalap (0.25%) was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry, then there was a 14-day washout (Washout #1), then Reproxalap (0.5%) was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry, then there was a 14-day (Washout #2), then Vehicle was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry.
22
Reproxalap (0.5%), Then Vehicle, Then Reproxalap (0.25%)
Reproxalap (0.5%) was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry, then there was a 14-day washout (Washout #1), then Vehicle) was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry, then there was a 14-day (Washout #2), then Reproxalap (0.25%) was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry.
25
Vehicle, Then Reproxalap (0.25%), Then Reproxalap (0.5%)
Vehicle was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry, then there was a 14-day washout (Washout #1), then Reproxalap (0.25%) was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry, then there was a 14-day (Washout #2), then Reproxalap (0.5%) was administered once 5 minutes before and 90 minutes after allergen chamber entry.
23
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReproxalap (0.25%), Then Reproxalap (0.5%), Then VehicleReproxalap (0.5%), Then Vehicle, Then Reproxalap (0.25%)Vehicle, Then Reproxalap (0.25%), Then Reproxalap (0.5%)Total
Age, Customized
Mean
45.50 years48.84 years46.17 years46.9 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants23 Participants18 Participants61 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 Participants5 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other - Mixed
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
15 Participants17 Participants13 Participants45 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
22 participants25 participants23 participants70 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants16 Participants14 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants9 Participants9 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 670 / 690 / 67
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 6756 / 695 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 670 / 690 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Subject-Reported Ocular Itching Score

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular itching score from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber using a 0 -100 millimeter visual analogue scale (0 = none, 100 = severe) was assessed. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline included itching score as a dependent variable, treatment, period, and interaction of treatment and period as fixed effects.

Time frame: Efficacy was assessed from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber.

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Reproxalap (0.25%)Subject-Reported Ocular Itching Score16.410 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6195
Reproxalap (0.5%)Subject-Reported Ocular Itching Score16.964 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.615
VehicleSubject-Reported Ocular Itching Score22.310 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6188
Secondary

Investigator-Assessed Conjunctival Redness Score

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for investigator-assessed conjunctival redness from 0 to 210 minutes in the allergen chamber using a 9-point scale with half unit increments (0 = normal, 4 = prominent) was assessed. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline included itching score as a dependent variable, treatment, period, and interaction of treatment and period as fixed effects.

Time frame: Efficacy was assessed from 0 to 210 minutes in the allergen chamber.

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Reproxalap (0.25%)Investigator-Assessed Conjunctival Redness Score0.5004 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0458
Reproxalap (0.5%)Investigator-Assessed Conjunctival Redness Score0.5462 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0457
VehicleInvestigator-Assessed Conjunctival Redness Score0.6497 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0458
Secondary

Subject-Reported Ocular Tearing Score

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular tearing score from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber using a 4-point scale (0 = none, 3 = severe) was assessed. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measures for change from baseline included itching score as a dependent variable, treatment, period, and interaction of treatment and period as fixed effects.

Time frame: Efficacy was assessed from 0 to 212 minutes in the allergen chamber.

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Reproxalap (0.25%)Subject-Reported Ocular Tearing Score0.8777 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0615
Reproxalap (0.5%)Subject-Reported Ocular Tearing Score0.8915 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0613
VehicleSubject-Reported Ocular Tearing Score1.0507 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0614

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026