Skip to content

The Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care Trial

The Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03668236
Acronym
CLASSIC
Enrollment
1554
Registered
2018-09-12
Start date
2018-11-27
Completion date
2022-11-16
Last updated
2025-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Keywords

Fluid resuscitation, Critical care, Intensive care, Crystalloid, IV fluid therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to assess patient important benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction vs. standard care fluid therapy in patients with septic shock.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Septic shock is common, often lethal, costly, and associated with prolonged suffering among survivors and relatives. Traditionally, intravenous (IV) fluids are used to optimise the circulation, and the use of higher volumes is recommended by international guidelines. There is, however, no high-quality evidence to support this. In contrast, data from cohort studies, small trials and systematic reviews in sepsis and large trials in other settings and patient groups suggest potential benefits from restriction of IV fluids in patients with septic shock. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the CLASSIC trial is to assess the benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction vs. standard care on patient-important outcome measures in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. DESIGN: CLASSIC is an international, multicentre, parallel-grouped, open-labelled, centrally randomised, stratified, outcome assessor- and analyst-blinded trial. POPULATION: Adult ICU patients who have septic shock and have received at least 1 L of IV fluid in the last 24-hours. EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTION: In the IV fluid restriction group no IV fluids should be given in the ICU unless extenuating circumstances occur, including signs of severe hypoperfusion, overt fluid loss or a failing GI tract with a total fluid input of less than 1 L per day. In these circumstances, IV fluid may be given in measured amounts. CONTROL INTERVENTION: In the standard care group there will be no upper limit for the use of IV fluids. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes are serious adverse events in the ICU (ischemic events or severe acute kidney injury); serious adverse reactions in the ICU; days alive without life support at day 90; days alive and out of hospital at day 90 and mortality, health-related quality of life and cognitive function at 1-year. TRIAL SIZE: A total of 1554 participants will be randomised to allow the detection of a 15% relative risk reduction (7% absolute) in the restrictive vs. standard care group in 90-day mortality with a power of 80%.

Interventions

Types of fluid to be used in both intervention groups: * IV fluids given for circulatory impairment: Only isotonic crystalloids are to be used as per the Scandinavian guideline for fluid resuscitation * Fluids given to substitute overt loss: Isotonic crystalloids are to be used. If large amounts of ascites are tapped, then human albumin may be used * Fluids used for dehydration: Water or isotonic glucose should be used * Fluids used for electrolyte disturbances: Fluids should be chosen to substitute the specific deficiency, including water in the case of severe hypernatremia * Blood products are only to be used on specific indications including severe bleeding, severe anaemia and prophylactic in case of severe coagulopathy

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC)
CollaboratorOTHER
Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Anders Perner, MD, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessor- and analyst-blinded trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All the following criteria must be fulfilled: * Aged 18 years or above * Admitted to the ICU or plan to be admitted to the ICU regardless of trial participation * Septic shock defined according to the Sepsis-3 criteria: * Suspected or confirmed site of infection or positive blood culture AND * Ongoing infusion of vasopressor/inotrope agent to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 65 mmHg or above AND * Lactate of 2 mmol/L or above in any plasma sample performed within the last 3-hours * Have received at least 1 L of IV fluid (crystalloids, colloids or blood products) in the last 24-hours prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who fulfil any of the following criteria will be excluded: * Septic shock for more than 12 hours at the time of screening as these patients are no longer early in their course * Life-threatening bleeding as these patients need specific fluid/blood product strategies * Acute burn injury of more than 10% of the body surface area as these patients need a specific fluid strategy * Known pregnancy * Consent not obtainable as per the model approved for the specific site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
90-day MortalityDay 90 after randomisationAl cause mortality at 90 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs) to IV Crystalloids in the ICU.Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 daysThe pre-specified SARs to IV crystalloids were: Generalized tonic-clonic seizures, anaphylactic reactions, central pontine myelinolysis, severe hypernatremia, severe hyperchloremic acidosis, and severe metabolic alkalosis. Data on the outcome measures, including SARs, were obtained from patient medical records by the trial investigators or their delegates.
Days Alive at Day 90 Without Life Support (Vasopressor / Inotropic Support, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Renal Replacement Therapy)Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days
Days Alive and Out of Hospital at Day 90Day 90 after randomisation
Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the ICUUntil ICU discharge, maximum 90 daysSAEs were defined as ischaemic events (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia) or as a new episode of severe acute kidney injury (modified KDIGO-3)
Health-related Quality of Life 1 Year After Randomisation1 year after randomisationMeasured using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (comprising 5 questions with a score from 1 to 5 each and a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100). Participants who have died will be assigned the lowest possible scores.
Cognitive Function 1-year After Randomisation1-year after randomisationAssessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) MINI score validated for telephone use. Mini MoCA consists of 4 cognitive dimensions: attention (immediate recall of 5 words), executive functions and language (1-min verbal fluency), orientation (6 items on date and geographic orientation), and memory (delayed recall and recognition of 5 previously learned words). The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with lower values indicating worse cognitive function. To correct for any educational effect on the cognitive test, 1 point is added for participants with 12 years of education or less (scores were truncated at the maximum upper value of 30 points) Participants who had died were assigned the value 0.
All-cause Mortality at 1-year After Randomisation1-year after randomisation

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

No patients were excluded from the trial prior to group assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fluid Restriction Group
No IV fluids unless one of the extenuating circumstances occurred (additional details in protocol section)
755
Standard-care
No upper limit for IV fluids (additional details in protocol section).
776
Total1,531

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
1-year Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject1715
90-day Follow-upLost to Follow-up31
90-day Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject32
Baseline CharacteristicsLost to Follow-up95

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFluid Restriction GroupStandard-careTotal
Age, Continuous71 years70 years70 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
755 Participants776 Participants1531 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
303 Participants324 Participants627 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
452 Participants452 Participants904 Participants
Volume of intravenous fluid 24 hr before randomization3200 ml3000 ml3068 ml

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
385 / 764383 / 781
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7550 / 776
serious
Total, serious adverse events
221 / 755238 / 776

Outcome results

Primary

90-day Mortality

Al cause mortality at 90 days

Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation

Population: Primary outcome data were missing from six patients in the restrictive-fluid group and three in the standard-fluid group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fluid Restriction Group90-day Mortality323 Participants
Standard-care90-day Mortality329 Participants
Secondary

All-cause Mortality at 1-year After Randomisation

Time frame: 1-year after randomisation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fluid Restriction GroupAll-cause Mortality at 1-year After Randomisation385 Participants
Standard-careAll-cause Mortality at 1-year After Randomisation383 Participants
Secondary

Cognitive Function 1-year After Randomisation

Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) MINI score validated for telephone use. Mini MoCA consists of 4 cognitive dimensions: attention (immediate recall of 5 words), executive functions and language (1-min verbal fluency), orientation (6 items on date and geographic orientation), and memory (delayed recall and recognition of 5 previously learned words). The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with lower values indicating worse cognitive function. To correct for any educational effect on the cognitive test, 1 point is added for participants with 12 years of education or less (scores were truncated at the maximum upper value of 30 points) Participants who had died were assigned the value 0.

Time frame: 1-year after randomisation

Population: In total, 82 patients in the restrictive group and 98 in the standard group had missing data (either completely missing or partially missing) for Mini MOCA.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fluid Restriction GroupCognitive Function 1-year After Randomisation0 Units on a scale
Standard-careCognitive Function 1-year After Randomisation0 Units on a scale
Secondary

Days Alive and Out of Hospital at Day 90

Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation

Population: All secondary outcome data were missing for 23 patients (15 patients in the restrictive-fluid group and 8 in the standard-fluid group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fluid Restriction GroupDays Alive and Out of Hospital at Day 9021 days
Standard-careDays Alive and Out of Hospital at Day 9033 days
Secondary

Days Alive at Day 90 Without Life Support (Vasopressor / Inotropic Support, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Renal Replacement Therapy)

Time frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days

Population: All secondary outcome data were missing for 23 patients (15 patients in the restrictive-fluid group and 8 in the standard-fluid group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fluid Restriction GroupDays Alive at Day 90 Without Life Support (Vasopressor / Inotropic Support, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Renal Replacement Therapy)77 days
Standard-careDays Alive at Day 90 Without Life Support (Vasopressor / Inotropic Support, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Renal Replacement Therapy)77 days
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life 1 Year After Randomisation

Measured using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (comprising 5 questions with a score from 1 to 5 each and a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100). Participants who have died will be assigned the lowest possible scores.

Time frame: 1 year after randomisation

Population: In total, 46 patients in the restrictive group and 55 in the standard group had missing data (either completely missing or partially missing) for EQ-5D-5L index values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fluid Restriction GroupHealth-related Quality of Life 1 Year After Randomisation0 EQ-5D-5L index values
Standard-careHealth-related Quality of Life 1 Year After Randomisation0 EQ-5D-5L index values
Secondary

Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the ICU

SAEs were defined as ischaemic events (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia) or as a new episode of severe acute kidney injury (modified KDIGO-3)

Time frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days

Population: All secondary outcome data were missing for 23 patients (15 patients in the restrictive-fluid group and 8 in the standard-fluid group). In the analysis of SAEs in the ICU, additional 9 patients (5 in the restrictive-fluid group and 4 in the standard-fluid group) had missing data for severe acute kidney injury. One of the 5 patients in the restrictive-fluid group had another SAE; thus only 8 patients had missing data in the composite outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fluid Restriction GroupNumber of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the ICU221 Participants
Standard-careNumber of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the ICU238 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs) to IV Crystalloids in the ICU.

The pre-specified SARs to IV crystalloids were: Generalized tonic-clonic seizures, anaphylactic reactions, central pontine myelinolysis, severe hypernatremia, severe hyperchloremic acidosis, and severe metabolic alkalosis. Data on the outcome measures, including SARs, were obtained from patient medical records by the trial investigators or their delegates.

Time frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days

Population: All secondary outcome data were missing for 23 patients (15 patients in the restrictive-fluid group and 8 in the standard-fluid group).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fluid Restriction GroupNumber of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs) to IV Crystalloids in the ICU.31 Participants
Standard-careNumber of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs) to IV Crystalloids in the ICU.32 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026