Skip to content

PORTEC-4a: Molecular Profile-based Versus Standard Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Endometrial Cancer

Randomised Phase III Trial of Molecular Profile-based Versus Standard Recommendations for Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Women With Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: PORTEC-4a Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03469674
Acronym
PORTEC-4a
Enrollment
550
Registered
2018-03-19
Start date
2016-06-10
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer Stage I, Endometrial Cancer Stage II

Keywords

Radiotherapy, Vaginal brachytherapy, Molecular risk factors

Brief summary

This is prospective, multicenter, randomised phase III trial among women with endometrial cancer with high-intermediate risk features to investigate the role of an integrated clinicopathological and molecular risk profile to determine if participants should receive no adjuvant therapy, vaginal brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy based on a favourable, intermediate or unfavourable profile as compared to standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy.

Detailed description

Adjuvant therapy for women with endometrial cancer has increasingly been tailored to prognostic factors to prevent overtreatment and select those women for adjuvant treatment who will have a clinically relevant reduction of the risk of relapse by the adjuvant treatment. Risk profiles have traditionally been based on clinicopathological factors such as age, stage, grade, LVSI and depth of invasion. Newer, both molecular-genetic (the cancer genome atlas subgroups) or immunohistochemistry-based (L1-CAM) risk factors have become available which are strongly related to outcomes and risk of cancer spread. In a comprehensive analysis of the PORTEC-1 and-2 biobank an integrated clinicopathological and molecular risk profile was determined which separated the current high-intermediate risk group of endometrial cancer in 3 separate groups (favourable, intermediate or unfavourable) with clearly separated outcomes, which is now prospectively tested in the clinic to determine adjuvant treatment. This is the first randomised trial using the molecular risk factors to assign adjuvant treatment for women with stage I-II high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer.

Interventions

Internal radiation of the vaginal vault using a vaginal cylinder, 21 Gy in 3 out-patient sessions over 2 weeks

RADIATIONExternal beam radiotherapy

External beam pelvic radiotherapy on a linear accelerator, 48.6 Gy in 27 out-patients sessions over 5.5 weeks

OTHERObservation

No radiation therapy, but active follow-up and quality of life questionnaires as in the groups who have adjuvant treatment

Sponsors

Dutch Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands
CollaboratorOTHER
Leiden University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Evaluation of outcomes is done without information on randomised arm

Intervention model description

2:1 randomisation to adjuvant treatment assignment based on the integrated molecular risk profile or standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed endometrioid type endometrial carcinoma, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I, with one of the following combinations of stage, grade, age, and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI): 1. Stage IA, grade 3 (any age, with or without LVSI) 2. Stage IB, grade 1 or 2 and age \>60 years 3. Stage IB, grade 1-2 with documented LVSI 4. Stage IB, grade 3 without LVSI 5. Stage II (microscopic), grade 1 * World Health Organization (WHO)-performance status 0-2 * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Any other stage and type of endometrial carcinoma * Histological types serous carcinoma or clear cell carcinoma (at least 10% if mixed type), or undifferentiated or neuroendocrine carcinoma * Uterine sarcoma (including carcinosarcoma) * Previous malignancy (except for non-melanomatous skin cancer) \< 5 yrs * Previous pelvic radiotherapy * Expected interval between the operation and start of radiotherapy exceeding 8 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaginal recurrence5 yearsTotal vaginal recurrence and vaginal recurrence as first failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events5 yearsTreatment-related symptoms according to CTCAE v 4.0
Health-related cancer-specific quality of life5 yearsCancer-specific quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQC-30) - clinically relevant changes on QLQC30 functioning scales, general quality of life and general cancer symptoms
Endometrial cancer-related symptoms and quality of life5 yearsEndometrial cancer-related specific symptoms (EORTC EN24 module)- clinically relevant changes on these scales (quite a bit/very much vs no or mild symptoms)
Relapse-free survival5 yearsRelapse-free survival (survival without relapse)
Survival5 yearsOverall survival (all-cause death)
Pelvic recurrence (total)5 yearsTotal pelvic recurrences
Pelvic recurrence as first failure5 yearsPelvic recurrence as first failure
Distant recurrence (total)5 yearsTotal distant recurrences
Distant recurrence as first failure5 yearsDistant recurrence as first failure
Endometrial cancer related health care costs5 yearsAll hospital based health care costs used with primary treatment or during followup for treatment of adverse events and/or treatment for relapse
5-year vaginal control including treatment for relapse5 yearsLong-term local control including salvage treatment for local relapse

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence (vaginal and total) per risk profile5 yearsVaginal, pelvic and distant relapse split by risk profile and compared between the 2 arms

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026