Skip to content

TRANSFORM-HF: ToRsemide compArisoN With furoSemide FORManagement of Heart Failure

TRANSFORM-HF: ToRsemide compArisoN With furoSemide FORManagement of Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03296813
Acronym
TRANSFORM-HF
Enrollment
2973
Registered
2017-09-28
Start date
2018-07-11
Completion date
2022-07-29
Last updated
2025-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

loop diuretic

Brief summary

TRANSFORM-HF is a large-scale, pragmatic, randomized, unblinded clinical effectiveness study comparing torsemide versus furosemide as treatment for heart failure. Approximately 6,000 patients with heart failure will be enrolled. The primary objective of the TRANSFORM-HF study is to compare the treatment strategy of torsemide versus furosemide on clinical outcomes over 12 months in patients with heart failure who are hospitalized.

Detailed description

* This study will be a randomized, unblinded, two-arm, multi-center clinical trial of patients with heart failure who are hospitalized. Heart failure need not be the reason for hospitalization. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either oral torsemide OR oral furosemide prior to hospital discharge. Oral dosing of torsemide compared to furosemide will be 1mg:2mg. The specific loop diuretic dose will be at the discretion of the treating physician with the above noted conversion. * Trial enrollment occurs before hospital discharge, at the discretion of the healthcare provider. * As appropriate, adherence to the randomized medication will be encouraged during the remainder of hospitalization and will continue post-discharge. Patients will receive follow-up per standard care without any additional study-specific visits. * Patients will have 30-day, 6-month and 12-month follow-up phone contacts for assessments of vital status, interval hospitalizations, adherence, and quality of life. Central follow-up and collection of hospital discharge summaries via IRB-approved mechanisms. Subsets of patients enrolled early in the study have additional phone contacts beyond 12 months, up to 30 months, at six month intervals, to document vital status.

Interventions

Loop diuretic

DRUGFurosemide

Loop diuretic

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study will be a randomized, unblinded, two-arm, multi-center clinical trial of patients with heart failure who are hospitalized. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either oral torsemide OR oral furosemide prior to hospital discharge.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient hospitalized (≥ 24 hours or over a change in calendar date) with worsening of chronic heart failure, or new diagnosis of heart failure AND meets one of the following criteria: 1. Has a left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤40% within 24 months prior to and including index hospitalization by any method (with most recent value used to determine eligibility) 2. Has an elevated natriuretic peptide level (either NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide or B-type natriuretic peptide) during index hospitalization as measured by local laboratory (with most recent value used to determine eligibility) 2. Plan for a daily outpatient oral loop diuretic regimen upon hospital discharge with anticipated need for long-term loop diuretic use 3. ≥ 18 years of age 4. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. End-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy 2. Inability or unwillingness to comply with the study requirements 3. History of heart transplant or actively listed for heart transplant 4. Implanted left ventricular assist device or implant anticipated \<3 months 5. Pregnant or nursing women 6. Malignancy or other non-cardiac condition limiting life expectancy to \<12 months 7. Known hypersensitivity to furosemide, torsemide, or related agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause Mortality, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDIup to 30 monthsDeath information was obtained from the Call Center through 30 months for patients 1-500, through 24 months for patients 501-1000, through 18 months for patients 1001-1500, and through 12 months for the remaining patients (except those who were randomized \< 12 months when the study was stopped by the DSMB). Also death information was obtained through searches of the 2018-2021 National Death Index (NDI) database.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause Mortality or All-cause Hospitalization, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI (for Death)up to 12 monthsThe time-to-event analysis of all-cause mortality or all-cause primary re-hospitalization was based on the time from randomization through death or the first primary re-hospitalization through 12 months. Patients who died or whose first all-cause re-hospitalization was after month 12 were censored at month 12. Patients who did not have a re-hospitalization and were alive were censored at the minimum of the time of the last re-hospitalization assessment or month 12.
Total Re-hospitalizations, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Callup to 12 monthsTotal all-cause primary re-hospitalization was defined as a hospitalization after the index hospitalization through month 12 that met one of the following criteria: 1.) at least a 24-hour stay (or a change in calendar date if the time of admission/discharge is not available) or 2.) reported as an in-patient admission by the patient/proxy with an admission date (complete or month and year) and no discharge date (i.e., length of stay could not be derived). Unit of measurement is the total number of re-hospitalizations for each subject (e.g., if a subject had 3 re-hospitalizations, then the outcome is 3 for the subject).
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone CallBaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 monthsQOL as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) (range, 0-100 with 100 indicating best health status). The KCCQ was administered prior to randomization (collected by the site) and at Months 1, 6 and 12 (ascertained at the Call Center visits). The outcome is the least square means in Torsemide and Furosemide groups where the difference = Torsemide mean minus Furosemide mean at the monthly assessment.
Symptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 1, month 6, month 12Depression was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) over 12 months. The PHQ-2 inquires about the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure) over the past two weeks. The responses to the questions are scored 0 = Not at all, 1 = Several days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day. The PHQ-2 total score is obtained by adding the score for each question. The PHQ-2 total score ranges from 0-6. Reported as the number of patients with a total score \<3 versus \>=3.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

2973 patients consented. 114 not randomized due to patient decision, PI decision, discharge before randomization occurred, died prior to randomization, or did not meet one or more eligibility criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Torsemide
Oral dosing of torsemide compared to furosemide will be 1mg:2-4mg. Torsemide: Loop diuretic
1,431
Furosemide
Oral dosing of torsemide compared to furosemide will be 1mg:2-4mg. For patients receiving loop diuretics other than furosemide, conversion to furosemide equivalents will be as follows: 1 mg oral torsemide = 2-4 mg oral furosemide 1 mg oral or intravenous bumetanide = 40 mg oral furosemide Furosemide: Loop diuretic
1,428
Total2,859

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTorsemideTotalFurosemide
Age, Continuous64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
75 Participants155 Participants80 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1355 Participants2700 Participants1345 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
9 Participants12 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
37 Participants63 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
474 Participants968 Participants494 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
65 Participants123 Participants58 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
13 Participants20 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
831 Participants1668 Participants837 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1431 Participants2859 Participants1428 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
498 Participants1055 Participants557 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
933 Participants1804 Participants871 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
373 / 1,431374 / 1,428
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

All-cause Mortality, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI

Death information was obtained from the Call Center through 30 months for patients 1-500, through 24 months for patients 501-1000, through 18 months for patients 1001-1500, and through 12 months for the remaining patients (except those who were randomized \< 12 months when the study was stopped by the DSMB). Also death information was obtained through searches of the 2018-2021 National Death Index (NDI) database.

Time frame: up to 30 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TorsemideAll-cause Mortality, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI373 Participants
FurosemideAll-cause Mortality, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI374 Participants
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide is superior to furosemide with respect to all-cause mortality among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.76595% CI: [0.885, 1.18]Regression, Cox
Secondary

All-cause Mortality or All-cause Hospitalization, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI (for Death)

The time-to-event analysis of all-cause mortality or all-cause primary re-hospitalization was based on the time from randomization through death or the first primary re-hospitalization through 12 months. Patients who died or whose first all-cause re-hospitalization was after month 12 were censored at month 12. Patients who did not have a re-hospitalization and were alive were censored at the minimum of the time of the last re-hospitalization assessment or month 12.

Time frame: up to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TorsemideAll-cause Mortality or All-cause Hospitalization, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI (for Death)677 Participants
FurosemideAll-cause Mortality or All-cause Hospitalization, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI (for Death)704 Participants
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide is superior to furosemide with respect to all-cause mortality or first all-cause hospitalization through month 12 among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.11395% CI: [0.826, 1.02]Regression, Cox
Secondary

All-cause Mortality or All-cause Hospitalization, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI (for Death)

All-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization over 30 days

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TorsemideAll-cause Mortality or All-cause Hospitalization, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI (for Death)149 Participants
FurosemideAll-cause Mortality or All-cause Hospitalization, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call or NDI (for Death)157 Participants
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide is superior to furosemide with respect to all-cause mortality or first all-cause hospitalization through day 30 among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.6195% CI: [0.753, 1.181]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call

QOL as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) (range, 0-100 with 100 indicating best health status). The KCCQ was administered prior to randomization (collected by the site) and at Months 1, 6 and 12 (ascertained at the Call Center visits). The outcome is the least square means in Torsemide and Furosemide groups where the difference = Torsemide mean minus Furosemide mean at the monthly assessment.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months

Population: Participants with both baseline and monthly KCCQ-CSS scores available (i.e., change from baseline at the month assessment could be analyzed).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
TorsemideChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone CallBaseline to Month 670.61 score on a scale
TorsemideChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone CallBaseline to Month 169.52 score on a scale
TorsemideChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone CallBaseline to Month 1270.00 score on a scale
FurosemideChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone CallBaseline to Month 168.22 score on a scale
FurosemideChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone CallBaseline to Month 671.01 score on a scale
FurosemideChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by Follow-up Phone CallBaseline to Month 1269.98 score on a scale
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide improves the QOL at 1 month compared to Furosemide as assessed by the KCCQ among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.19495% CI: [-0.66, 3.26]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide improves the QOL at 6 months compared to Furosemide as assessed by the KCCQ among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.71895% CI: [-2.53, 1.74]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide improves the QOL at 12 months compared to Furosemide as assessed by the KCCQ among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.98795% CI: [-2.26, 2.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Symptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

Depression was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) over 12 months. The PHQ-2 inquires about the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure) over the past two weeks. The responses to the questions are scored 0 = Not at all, 1 = Several days, 2 = More than half the days, and 3 = Nearly every day. The PHQ-2 total score is obtained by adding the score for each question. The PHQ-2 total score ranges from 0-6. Reported as the number of patients with a total score \<3 versus \>=3.

Time frame: Month 1, month 6, month 12

Population: Participants with data available at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TorsemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 12PHQ-2 score > = 395 Participants
TorsemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 1PHQ-2 score > = 3148 Participants
TorsemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 6PHQ-2 score < 3658 Participants
TorsemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 6PHQ-2 score > = 3113 Participants
TorsemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 12PHQ-2 score < 3533 Participants
TorsemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 1PHQ-2 score < 3790 Participants
FurosemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 12PHQ-2 score < 3537 Participants
FurosemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 1PHQ-2 score < 3813 Participants
FurosemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 6PHQ-2 score > = 3119 Participants
FurosemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 1PHQ-2 score > = 3150 Participants
FurosemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 12PHQ-2 score > = 382 Participants
FurosemideSymptoms of Depression as Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)Month 6PHQ-2 score < 3672 Participants
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide reduces symptoms of depression at 1 month compared to Furosemide as assessed by the PHQ-2 among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.904Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide reduces symptoms of depression at 6 months compared to Furosemide as assessed by the PHQ-2 among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.829Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide reduces symptoms of depression at 12 months compared to Furosemide as assessed by the PHQ-2 among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.342Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Total Re-hospitalizations, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call

Total all-cause primary re-hospitalization was defined as a hospitalization after the index hospitalization through month 12 that met one of the following criteria: 1.) at least a 24-hour stay (or a change in calendar date if the time of admission/discharge is not available) or 2.) reported as an in-patient admission by the patient/proxy with an admission date (complete or month and year) and no discharge date (i.e., length of stay could not be derived). Unit of measurement is the total number of re-hospitalizations for each subject (e.g., if a subject had 3 re-hospitalizations, then the outcome is 3 for the subject).

Time frame: up to 12 months

Population: Participants who had at least one re-hospitalization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TorsemideTotal Re-hospitalizations, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call940 re-hospitalizations
FurosemideTotal Re-hospitalizations, as Measured by Follow-up Phone Call987 re-hospitalizations
Comparison: To determine whether torsemide is superior to furosemide with respect to total all-cause hospitalizations through month 12 among patients hospitalized for heart failure.p-value: 0.36695% CI: [0.836, 1.068]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026