Skip to content

Early Valve Replacement Guided by Biomarkers of LV Decompensation in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe AS

Early Valve Replacement Guided by Biomarkers of Left Ventricular Decompensation in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03094143
Acronym
EVoLVeD
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2017-03-29
Start date
2017-07-21
Completion date
2032-06-30
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular

Brief summary

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease in the Western world. It is caused by progressive narrowing of the aortic valve leading to increased strain on the heart muscle which has to work increasingly hard to pump blood through the narrowed valve. Over time the heart muscle thickens to generate more force, but eventually the heart fails leading to death if the valve is not replaced with an operation. No medical treatments exist to stop or reverse the heart valve narrowing. Current clinical guidelines suggest that an operation should be performed only when symptoms develop or the heart muscle is visibly weak on cardiac ultrasound scanning. However, symptoms can be difficult to interpret and in many patients the heart muscle has become irreversibly damaged and the heart fails to recover following surgery. Using MRI scans of the heart, the investigators have identified heart scarring which seems to develop as the heart muscle thickens. Several studies now show that people who have developed this scarring are more likely to suffer poor outcomes including death. The investigators have also identified clinical risks that predict the presence of scarring. The investigators propose a study where patients with severe aortic stenosis but no indications for valve replacement as per current guidelines are assessed for those clinical risks. If a participant's risk of having scarring is higher they will undergo a cardiac MRI scan. If scarring is present participants will be randomised to routine clinical care, or referral for valve replacement surgery. Participants with no evidence of scarring will be randomised routine care with study follow or not. The investigators of this study hypothesize that early surgery will lead to fewer complications and reduced risk of death compared to standard care.

Interventions

The choice of either surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) will be made by the local clinical team according to local policies. In patients undergoing surgical replacement the choice of surgical technique and type of valve replacement used will be at the discretion of the operating surgeon. Patients found to have significant coronary artery disease requiring concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery will not be excluded. Similarly the choice of TAVI valve and need for percutaneous coronary intervention will be made by the TAVI heart team. The procedure should be performed as soon as possible and ideally within four months of randomisation and allocation to group A.

Sponsors

University of Edinburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER
Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The result of the cardiac MRI will be blinded to care provider, participant and investigator. Group A will be unblinded, as participants can only enter group A if mid-wall fibrosis is present. Groups B and C will appear identical and the groups combined so the presence of mid-wall fibrosis will be blinded. Group D will be unblinded, as participants can only enter group D if mid-wall fibrosis is not present. Outcome assessors will be blinded to allocation in all groups where outcome is adjudicated (groups A, B and C)

Intervention model description

\ 1000 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis will be screened across the sites (this is how we have defined enrollment below). Patients at high risk of left ventricular decompensation based on high-sensitivity troponin or ECG will proceed to CMR. Participants are randomised based on the result of the cardiac MRI. Participants who have mid wall fibrosis (heart scarring) are randomised to receive either early surgical intervention (group A) or routine care (group B). Participants who have no mid wall fibrosis are randomised to routine care with study follow up (group C) or without study follow up (group D).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve jet velocity ≥4.0 m/s, or aortic valve area indexed to body surface area \<0.6cm2/m2 with aortic jet velocity ≥3.5m/s) 2. Age over 18 years 3. No symptoms attributable to aortic stenosis that require aortic valve replacement

Exclusion criteria

1. Deemed lower risk for mid-wall fibrosis on screening 2. Planned cardiac surgery 3. Previous valve replacement 4. Severe hypertension (systolic \>180 or diastolic \>110 mmHg) 5. Acute pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock 6. Left ventricular ejection fraction \<50% on cardiac MRI 7. Significant abnormalities on cardiac MRI that would prevent enrolment 8. Coexistent severe aortic regurgitation or mitral regurgitation 9. Coexistent mitral stenosis greater than mild in severity 10. Coexistent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or cardiac amyloidosis 11. Any contraindication to MRI scanning (such as permanent pacemaker) 12. Advanced renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2) 13. Pregnancy or breast feeding 14. Patient judged to be unfit to be considered for aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation 15. Patient declines to consider undergoing valve replacement surgery or transcatheter aortic valve implantation 16. Inability to give informed consent 17. Previous randomisation into this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of all-cause mortality or unplanned aortic stenosis-related hospitalisationRandomisation through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)The first event of all-cause mortality or unplanned aortic stenosis-related hospitalisation Unplanned aortic stenosis-related hospitalisation is defined as an unplanned admission with syncope, heart failure, chest pain or arrhythmia (ventricular arrhythmia or second or third degree heart block) attributed to aortic stenosis. This endpoint will be adjudicated by two independent investigators blinded to the details of randomisation following review of the case notes and hospital records.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortalityRandomisation through to study completion, an average of 2.75 years
Cardiovascular deathRandomisation through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)
AS-related deathRandomisation through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)AS-related death is a death where aortic stenosis has been listed as a contributory cause by the clinical care team on the patient's official death certificate.
Sudden cardiac deathRandomisation through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)
Unplanned aortic-stenosis related hospitalisationRandomisation through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)Unplanned aortic stenosis-related hospitalisation is defined as an unplanned admission with syncope, heart failure, chest pain or arrhythmia (ventricular arrhythmia or second or third degree heart block) attributed to aortic stenosis.
WHODAS 2.0 (12 item)At study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic assessment instrument developed by WHO to provide a standardized method for measuring health and disability across cultures.
LV systolic functionRandomisation through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)The development of LV systolic dysfunction (EF \<50% quantitatively or at least mild LV dysfunction qualitatively)
NYHA statusAt study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)Self reported patient symptoms on a scale of I-IV (I = No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, IV = Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.)
Permanent pacemaker insertion, cardiac resynchronisation therapy or automated implantable cardioverter defibrillatorRandomisation to through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)To compare between study arms the number of participants who have had a permanent pacemaker insertion, cardiac resynchronisation therapy or automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator
StrokeRandomisation through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)
EndocarditisRandomisation to through to study completion (mean follow up is expected to be an average of 2.75 years)To compare between study arms the number of participants who have endocarditis
Post-operative complications following aortic valve intervention30 days post aortic valve intervention

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMarc Dweck

University of Edinburgh

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026