Skip to content

Study of Lemborexant for Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder and Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study With Open-Label Extension Phase of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant in Subjects With Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder and Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03001557
Enrollment
63
Registered
2016-12-23
Start date
2016-12-20
Completion date
2020-04-17
Last updated
2021-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder

Keywords

Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia, sleep, circadian rhythms

Brief summary

This study will be conducted to determine the dose response of lemborexant (LEM) on the change from baseline in actigraphy-derived sleep-related parameters, wake-related parameters, and circadian-rhythm related parameters. Following the eligibility screening period, eligible participants will be assigned at random to 1 of 4 doses of LEM or to placebo for 4 weeks. After a 2-week follow-up period, eligible participants may enter an open-label extension period for up to 30 months or until the program discontinuation.

Interventions

Lemborexant 2.5 mg tablets

Lemborexant 5 mg tablets

Lemborexant 10 mg tablets

DRUGLemborexant 15 mg

Lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg tablets

Lemborexant-matched placebo tablets

Sponsors

Purdue Pharma LP
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(Core Study): * Male or female, age 60 to 90 years at the time of informed consent * Able to provide informed consent. If a participant lacks capacity to consent in the investigator's opinion, the participant's assent should be obtained, if required in accordance with local laws, regulations and customs, and the written informed consent of a legal representative should be obtained (capacity to consent and definition of legal representative should be determined in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations). * Documentation of diagnosis with Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD-D) on the basis of the National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association Diagnostic Guidelines * Mini Mental State Examination 10 to 26 at Screening * Meets criteria for Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder, Irregular Sleep-Wake Type (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition) and the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, as follows: Complaint by the participant or caregiver of difficulty sleeping during the night and/or excessive daytime sleepiness associated with multiple irregular sleep bouts during a 24-hour period * Frequency of complaint of sleep and wake fragmentation ≥3 days per week * Duration of complaint of sleep and wake fragmentation ≥3 months * During the Screening Period, mean actigraphy-derived sleep efficiency (aSE) \<87.5% within the defined nocturnal sleep period and mean actigraphy-derived wake efficiency (aWE) \<87.5% during the defined wake period * Confirmation by actigraphy of a combination of sleep bouts of \>10 minutes during the wake period plus wake bouts of \>10 minutes during the sleep period, totaling at least 4 bouts per 24 hours period, ≥ 3 days per week * Ambulatory and living in the community or in a residence not classified as a skilled nursing facility (an assisted living facility with separate living quarters where participants and their caregivers reside is acceptable) * Willing not to start a behavioral or other treatment program for sleep or wake difficulties and not to start a new treatment for other symptoms of AD-D during participation in the study * Has a reliable and competent caregiver (or caregiver and informants) who can accompany the participant to study visits, administer study medication on a nightly basis and provide information on the status of the participant * For participants taking a cholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine, dosing regimen must have been stable for at least 3 months Inclusion Criteria (Extension Phase): * Completed the Core Study (End of Study \[EOS\] Visit). Participants who participated in the Core Study and completed the EOS Visit within 30 days may return to participate in the Extension Phase as long as there are no contraindications due to ongoing adverse events or prohibited medications. Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers: * Able to provide informed consent * Spends at least 10 hours per week with the participant * Able to meet caregiver requirements * Willing to provide information on himself/herself regarding sleep quality and caregiver Burden

Exclusion criteria

* A diagnosis of vascular dementia, dementia following multiple strokes, or any synucleinopathy / Lewy body disorder. This includes Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Parkinson's disease with or without dementia. * A current diagnosis of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or central sleep apnea, or current use of continuous positive airways pressure even if mild severity of OSA, restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement disorder (with awakenings), or narcolepsy * An Apnea-Hypopnea Index or equivalent ≥15 events/hour on diagnostic sleep study conducted prior to Baseline or within 6 months of Screening * A clinically significant movement disorder that would affect the differentiation of sleep and wake by the actigraphy analytic algorithm * Current symptoms or history during the past year of Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder or sleep-related violent behavior * Probable Major Depression, as evidenced by score \>10 on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia at Screening * Unable to tolerate wearing the actigraph. At a minimum, participants must be able to wear the actigraph for 5 complete days out of 7 days' data. A day will be considered complete as long as data from 90% of the 24-hour period are able to be scored. * Excessive caffeine use that in the opinion of the investigator contributes to the participant's Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (ISWRD) * History of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the previous 2 years * Reports habitually consuming more than 14 drinks containing alcohol per week or habitually consumes alcohol within 3 hours before bedtime and unwilling to limit alcohol intake to 2 or fewer drinks per day or forego having alcohol within 3 hours before bedtime for the duration of his/her participation in the study * Known to be human immunodeficiency virus positive * Active viral hepatitis (B or C) as demonstrated by positive serology at Screening * A prolonged QTcF interval (QTcF \>450 milliseconds\[ms\]) as demonstrated by a repeated electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening (repeated only if initial ECG indicates a QTcF interval \>450 ms) (participants with evidence of bundle branch block are not excluded if the block is not clinically significant, as documented by the investigator in the source document) * Current evidence of clinically significant disease that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments * Any history of a medical or psychiatric condition other than Alzheimer's Disease dementia that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments * History of malignancy within the previous 5 years except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ * Any suicidal ideation with intent with or without a plan, at the time of or within 6 months of Screening, as indicated by answering Yes to questions 4 and 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the electronic version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS) * Any suicidal behavior within the past 10 years based on the eC-SSRS * History of violence toward the caregiver or others * Scheduled for surgery using general anesthesia during the study * Used any prohibited prescription or over-the-counter concomitant medications within 1 week or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before starting actigraphy during Screening * Used any modality of treatment for ISWRD between Screening and Randomization based on approaches related to circadian rhythms, including phototherapy (light therapy), melatonin and melatonin agonists * Failed treatment with Belsomra (efficacy and/or safety) following treatment with an appropriate dose and of adequate duration in the opinion of the investigator * Transmeridian travel across more than 3 time zones between Screening and Randomization, or plans to travel across more than 3 time zones during the study * Hypersensitivity to lemborexant or to its excipients * Currently enrolled in another clinical trial, except for observational studies with no treatment component * Used any investigational drug or device before informed consent (ie, within 30 days or 5× the investigational drug half-life whichever is longer or 6 months for potential disease-modifying drugs) * Previously participated in any clinical trial of lemborexant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1The SFI was defined as the sum of a movement index (MI) and a fragmentation index (FI) during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per time in bed (TBI) multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of less than or equal to (\<=) 1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (%) (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number \<=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number \<=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number \<=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1The WFI were calculated as the sum of an immobility index (II) and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1Intradaily variability gives an indication of irregular sleep-wake rhythm disorder (ISWRD) by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 3M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 4M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 1AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline, Week 2AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Day 29The CGIC-ISWRD scale is a validated categorical measure of change in the participant's clinical condition between baseline and follow-up visits. It relies on both direct examination of the participant and an interview of the informant. The instrument consisted of 3 parts: a guided baseline interview administered to the participant and an informant, a follow-up interview administered to the participant and an informant, and a clinician's rating review. The baseline interview served as a reference for future ratings. During the baseline interview, the rater evaluated participant regarding domains of (1) sleep and wake symptoms; (2) mood and behavioral symptoms; (3) attention/arousal; and (4) social functioning. In the follow-up interview, a 7-pointscale was used, from 1 = marked improvement, 4 = no change, to 7 = marked worsening, to score each of the 4 domains and to provide a global score (1 \[marked improvement\] to 7 \[marked worsening\]).
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Baseline, Day 29The NPI-10 assessed a wide range of behaviors seen in dementia for both frequency and severity. It is a 10 item questionnaire with the following domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/liability and aberrant motor behavior. The total score was summarized and analyzed. This scale was administered with the caregiver as proxy for the participant. The total score was a sum of the 10 domains, where the score of each domain was calculated as frequency (scale: 1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) \* Severity (scale: 1=Mild to 3=Severe). Each domain has a maximum score of 12 and all domains were equally weighted for total score, thus the range for the total score is 0 to 120 with 0 being completely healthy to 120 which is the worse score participant could get.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Baseline, Day 29The SDI is an expanded version of one item of the NPI. It described the frequency, severity, and caregiver burden of sleep-disturbed behaviors during a period prior to its administration. The SDI consists of the 7 sub questions relating to sleep from the NPI sleep disturbance item. Each of the sub questions is a separate question with frequency, severity, and caregiver distress rated by the caregiver with respect to the patient-participant for the 2 weeks prior to the visit. The SDI score is derived as the product of the average of the frequency ratings and the average of the severity ratings (range: 0-12 \[worst\]).
Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Baseline, Day 133, 223, 313, 343, 373, 403, 493, 583, 673, and 763The SDI is an expanded version of one item of the NPI. It described the frequency, severity, and caregiver burden of sleep-disturbed behaviors during a period prior to its administration. The SDI consists of the 7 sub questions relating to sleep from the NPI sleep disturbance item. Each of the sub questions is a separate question with frequency, severity, and caregiver distress rated by the caregiver with respect to the patient-participant for the 2 weeks prior to the visit. The SDI score is derived as the product of the average of the frequency ratings and the average of the severity ratings (range: 0-12 \[worst\]).
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)First dose of study drug (Day 1) to 14 days after last dose of study drug (approximately up to 2 years 7 months)

Countries

Japan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 57 investigative sites in the United States, Japan and United Kingdom from 20 Dec 2016 to 17 Apr 2020.

Pre-assignment details

In Core phase, a total of 214 participants were screened, of which 151 were screen failures and 63 were randomized and enrolled in to the study. Of these 63 participants, 62 received the study treatment (1 participant was inadvertently randomized but did not receive any study drug). In Extension phase, a total of 25 participants who completed the Core Phase, gave consent to join Extension phase were enrolled and treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched Placebo
Participants received two lemborexant-matched placebo, tablets, orally, once daily, immediately (within 5 minutes) before the bedtime at night for 28 consecutive nights in 4-week treatment period.
12
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mg
Participants received one lemborexant 2.5 mg and one lemborexant-matched placebo, tablets, orally, once daily, immediately (within 5 minutes) before the bedtime at night for 28 consecutive nights in 4-week treatment period.
12
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mg
Participants received one lemborexant 5 mg and one lemborexant-matched placebo, tablets, orally, once daily, immediately (within 5 minutes) before the bedtime at night for 28 consecutive nights in 4-week treatment period.
13
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mg
Participants received one lemborexant 10 mg and one lemborexant-matched placebo, tablets, orally, once daily, immediately (within 5 minutes) before the bedtime at night for 28 consecutive nights in 4-week treatment period.
13
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mg
Participants received one lemborexant 5 mg and one lemborexant 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily, immediately (within 5 minutes) before the bedtime at night for 28 consecutive nights in 4-week treatment period.
12
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Core PhaseRandomized but not treated00100000
Extension PhaseAdministrative Reason00000133
Extension PhaseAdverse Event00000200
Extension PhaseLoss of caregiver00000010
Extension PhaseLost to Follow-up00000021
Extension PhaseOthers00000130
Extension PhaseWithdrawal by Subject00000152

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCore Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgTotal
Age, Continuous75.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15
76.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.32
76.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.98
71.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.05
71.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11
74.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.94
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants8 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants10 Participants9 Participants7 Participants4 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants9 Participants9 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants6 Participants8 Participants6 Participants10 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants6 Participants5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 130 / 130 / 120 / 50 / 140 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 123 / 123 / 134 / 136 / 124 / 510 / 145 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 130 / 130 / 121 / 52 / 141 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of Treatment

AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline7396.9 activity countStandard Deviation 2728.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-141.1 activity countStandard Deviation 1583.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline10300.6 activity countStandard Deviation 4235.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-471.6 activity countStandard Deviation 3414.4
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline10994.8 activity countStandard Deviation 3601.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1285.8 activity countStandard Deviation 1788.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-123.0 activity countStandard Deviation 2784.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline9405.0 activity countStandard Deviation 5133.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline9970.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4905.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1323.0 activity countStandard Deviation 2436
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of Treatment

AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline7396.9 activity countStandard Deviation 2728.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2146.8 activity countStandard Deviation 1603.7
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline10300.6 activity countStandard Deviation 4235.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-708.9 activity countStandard Deviation 2934.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline10994.8 activity countStandard Deviation 3601.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 297.6 activity countStandard Deviation 2105.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-782.7 activity countStandard Deviation 2141.4
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline9405.0 activity countStandard Deviation 5133.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline9970.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4905.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-79.3 activity countStandard Deviation 1672.5
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of Treatment

AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline7396.9 activity countStandard Deviation 2728.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 31.1 activity countStandard Deviation 1862.7
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline10300.6 activity countStandard Deviation 4235.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-721.0 activity countStandard Deviation 3502.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline10994.8 activity countStandard Deviation 3601.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3805.6 activity countStandard Deviation 2195.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-713.7 activity countStandard Deviation 2178.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline9405.0 activity countStandard Deviation 5133.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline9970.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4905.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-239.7 activity countStandard Deviation 2592.5
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of Treatment

AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline7396.9 activity countStandard Deviation 2728.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 41357.3 activity countStandard Deviation 1801.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline10300.6 activity countStandard Deviation 4235.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1058.0 activity countStandard Deviation 2170.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline10994.8 activity countStandard Deviation 3601.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-132.9 activity countStandard Deviation 840.7
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4249.4 activity countStandard Deviation 2694.7
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline9405.0 activity countStandard Deviation 5133.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline9970.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4905.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-297.1 activity countStandard Deviation 1608.2
p-value: 0.298495% CI: [-2440.854, 762.678]MMRM
p-value: 0.421895% CI: [-962.835, 2266.678]MMRM
p-value: 0.565595% CI: [-1998.44, 1103.95]MMRM
p-value: 0.868695% CI: [-1706.478, 1445.272]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of Treatment

L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1163.5 activity countStandard Deviation 373.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 285.8 activity countStandard Deviation 525.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1266.4 activity countStandard Deviation 678.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-259.8 activity countStandard Deviation 244.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1163.2 activity countStandard Deviation 591.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-218.7 activity countStandard Deviation 321.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2218.5 activity countStandard Deviation 455.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1257.1 activity countStandard Deviation 836.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1490.4 activity countStandard Deviation 963.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-246.1 activity countStandard Deviation 637.6
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of Treatment

L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1163.5 activity countStandard Deviation 373.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3299.2 activity countStandard Deviation 1070.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1266.4 activity countStandard Deviation 678.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-265.3 activity countStandard Deviation 507
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1163.2 activity countStandard Deviation 591.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-233.0 activity countStandard Deviation 369.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-114.6 activity countStandard Deviation 376.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1257.1 activity countStandard Deviation 836.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1490.4 activity countStandard Deviation 963.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-396.1 activity countStandard Deviation 543.9
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of Treatment

L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1163.5 activity countStandard Deviation 373.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4293.1 activity countStandard Deviation 662.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1266.4 activity countStandard Deviation 678.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-334.0 activity countStandard Deviation 476.4
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1163.2 activity countStandard Deviation 591.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-344.5 activity countStandard Deviation 419.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 430.5 activity countStandard Deviation 772.5
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1257.1 activity countStandard Deviation 836.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1490.4 activity countStandard Deviation 963.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-160.7 activity countStandard Deviation 471.3
p-value: 0.029495% CI: [-739.177, -40.569]MMRM
p-value: 0.024395% CI: [-751.67, -54.319]MMRM
p-value: 0.420995% CI: [-489.805, 207.752]MMRM
p-value: 0.039895% CI: [-717.87, -17.82]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of Treatment

L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1163.5 activity countStandard Deviation 373.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1200.9 activity countStandard Deviation 633.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1266.4 activity countStandard Deviation 678.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-259.8 activity countStandard Deviation 450.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1163.2 activity countStandard Deviation 591.8
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-243.2 activity countStandard Deviation 333.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-211.6 activity countStandard Deviation 378.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1257.1 activity countStandard Deviation 836.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1490.4 activity countStandard Deviation 963.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-434.2 activity countStandard Deviation 509.1
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of Treatment

aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline76.34 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.559
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.14 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 5.766
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline77.64 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.883
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 12.43 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 3.91
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline78.45 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.844
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 13.87 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 4.646
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.17 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 5.861
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline76.38 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.037
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline77.35 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.624
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.05 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 4.475
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of Treatment

aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline69.74 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 12.609
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.59 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 4.177
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline70.57 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.669
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-2.41 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 6.726
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline72.53 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.473
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 11.09 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 6.793
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-1.55 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 9.216
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline67.19 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.523
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline70.67 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.221
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-2.37 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 8.779
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of Treatment

aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline76.34 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.559
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-1.31 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.004
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline77.64 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.883
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 22.17 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 2.833
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline78.45 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.844
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 21.65 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 4.644
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-1.41 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 5.896
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline76.38 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.037
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline77.35 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.624
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.07 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 5.449
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of Treatment

aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline76.34 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.559
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.30 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 10.552
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline77.64 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.883
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 31.68 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 3.229
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline78.45 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.844
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.91 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.571
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-1.49 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 4.442
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline76.38 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.037
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline77.35 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.624
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 31.10 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.112
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of Treatment

aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline76.34 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.559
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.78 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 9.555
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline77.64 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.883
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 41.68 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 4.696
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline78.45 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.844
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.00 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 5.547
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1.04 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 5.92
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline76.38 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.037
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline77.35 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.624
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.81 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.735
p-value: 0.109995% CI: [-0.741, 7.096]MMRM
p-value: 0.157695% CI: [-1.119, 6.723]MMRM
p-value: 0.61695% CI: [-4.777, 2.857]MMRM
p-value: 0.713595% CI: [-3.16, 4.585]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of Treatment

aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline69.74 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 12.609
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 22.14 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 2.773
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline70.57 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.669
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-1.54 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 6.55
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline72.53 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.473
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 21.04 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 7.511
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-3.16 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 12.816
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline67.19 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.523
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline70.67 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.221
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.63 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 5.617
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of Treatment

aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline69.74 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 12.609
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 31.64 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 5.451
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline70.57 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.669
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-2.37 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 6.239
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline72.53 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.473
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 32.34 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 8.37
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-4.99 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.479
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline67.19 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.523
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline70.67 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.221
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-1.83 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 5.579
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of Treatment

aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 42.03 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 6.841
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline69.74 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 12.609
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline70.57 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.669
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-2.29 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 7.724
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 43.62 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 8.586
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline72.53 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.473
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline67.19 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.523
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-2.65 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 9.627
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline70.67 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 11.221
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.43 percentage of wake timeStandard Deviation 5.848
p-value: 0.177795% CI: [-8.481, 1.608]MMRM
p-value: 0.56395% CI: [-3.564, 6.479]MMRM
p-value: 0.048295% CI: [-9.946, -0.041]MMRM
p-value: 0.303695% CI: [-7.599, 2.413]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of Treatment

IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.45 ratioStandard Deviation 0.173
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.04 ratioStandard Deviation 0.083
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.47 ratioStandard Deviation 0.111
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.089
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.49 ratioStandard Deviation 0.118
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.04 ratioStandard Deviation 0.115
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.00 ratioStandard Deviation 0.155
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.46 ratioStandard Deviation 0.16
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.41 ratioStandard Deviation 0.104
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.06 ratioStandard Deviation 0.063
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of Treatment

Intradaily variability gives an indication of irregular sleep-wake rhythm disorder (ISWRD) by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.90 ratioStandard Deviation 0.272
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.06 ratioStandard Deviation 0.218
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.98 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.237
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.271
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline1.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.33
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.278
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of Treatment

Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.05 ratioStandard Deviation 0.132
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.90 ratioStandard Deviation 0.272
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.14 ratioStandard Deviation 0.325
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.98 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.235
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.07 ratioStandard Deviation 0.143
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline1.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.33
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.05 ratioStandard Deviation 0.234
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of Treatment

Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.06 ratioStandard Deviation 0.243
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.90 ratioStandard Deviation 0.272
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.07 ratioStandard Deviation 0.246
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.98 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.00 ratioStandard Deviation 0.241
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.06 ratioStandard Deviation 0.311
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline1.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.33
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.219
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of Treatment

Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.324
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.90 ratioStandard Deviation 0.272
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.196
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.98 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.157
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.12 ratioStandard Deviation 0.274
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.295
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline1.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.33
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.10 ratioStandard Deviation 0.222
p-value: 0.242195% CI: [-0.06, 0.232]MMRM
p-value: 0.866195% CI: [-0.155, 0.131]MMRM
p-value: 0.425195% CI: [-0.085, 0.199]MMRM
p-value: 0.724895% CI: [-0.116, 0.166]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of Treatment

IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.45 ratioStandard Deviation 0.173
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.06 ratioStandard Deviation 0.093
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.47 ratioStandard Deviation 0.111
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.101
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.49 ratioStandard Deviation 0.118
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.133
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.06 ratioStandard Deviation 0.091
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.46 ratioStandard Deviation 0.16
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.41 ratioStandard Deviation 0.104
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.09 ratioStandard Deviation 0.085
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of Treatment

IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.45 ratioStandard Deviation 0.173
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.104
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.47 ratioStandard Deviation 0.111
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.107
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.49 ratioStandard Deviation 0.118
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.115
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.04 ratioStandard Deviation 0.136
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.46 ratioStandard Deviation 0.16
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.41 ratioStandard Deviation 0.104
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.04 ratioStandard Deviation 0.075
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of Treatment

IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.45 ratioStandard Deviation 0.173
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.098
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.47 ratioStandard Deviation 0.111
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.119
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.49 ratioStandard Deviation 0.118
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.08 ratioStandard Deviation 0.092
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.127
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.46 ratioStandard Deviation 0.16
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.41 ratioStandard Deviation 0.104
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.00 ratioStandard Deviation 0.102
p-value: 0.299195% CI: [-0.094, 0.029]MMRM
p-value: 0.286195% CI: [-0.028, 0.095]MMRM
p-value: 0.093895% CI: [-0.113, 0.009]MMRM
p-value: 0.861895% CI: [-0.055, 0.066]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of Treatment

The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number \<=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline58.51 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.923
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 22.52 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 11.845
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline53.87 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.594
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-6.91 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 5.994
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline50.07 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.493
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-4.95 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.399
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.34 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 14.194
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline54.75 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.38
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline54.78 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.338
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-3.18 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.971
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of Treatment

The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number \<=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline58.51 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.923
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-3.30 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.512
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline53.87 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.594
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-2.79 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 7.541
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline50.07 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.493
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-5.22 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 11.974
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.36 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 9.018
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline54.75 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.38
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline54.78 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.338
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-4.92 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 9.572
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of Treatment

The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number \<=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline58.51 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.923
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1.39 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 19.383
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline53.87 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.594
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1.35 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.821
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline50.07 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.493
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1.96 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.459
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.45 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 13.389
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline54.75 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.38
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline54.78 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.338
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1.68 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.683
p-value: 0.158295% CI: [-12.24, 2.045]MMRM
p-value: 0.096195% CI: [-13.332, 1.122]MMRM
p-value: 0.844995% CI: [-6.262, 7.623]MMRM
p-value: 0.374795% CI: [-10.178, 3.897]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of Treatment

The SFI was defined as the sum of a movement index (MI) and a fragmentation index (FI) during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per time in bed (TBI) multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of less than or equal to (\<=) 1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (%) (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline58.51 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.923
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-1.43 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 9.294
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline53.87 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.594
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-5.80 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 11.388
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline50.07 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 12.493
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-8.16 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.802
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-2.55 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 11.756
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline54.75 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.38
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline54.78 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.338
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-3.52 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.882
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of Treatment

The WFI were calculated as the sum of an immobility index (II) and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline92.43 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.547
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.14 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 6.968
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline85.72 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.137
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 14.22 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 9.988
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline86.53 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.705
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-2.18 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 10.571
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 12.01 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 13.017
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline94.76 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline87.96 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.928
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 13.25 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 13.006
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of Treatment

The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline92.43 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.547
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-3.76 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 3.94
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline85.72 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.137
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 24.12 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.671
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline86.53 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.705
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-2.36 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 11.453
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 25.09 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 19.006
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline94.76 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline87.96 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.928
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 21.78 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 9.271
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of Treatment

The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline92.43 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.547
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-1.65 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 7.98
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline85.72 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.137
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 34.70 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 9.674
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline86.53 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.705
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-3.69 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 13.236
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 36.88 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.704
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline94.76 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline87.96 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.928
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 32.10 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.631
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of Treatment

The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of \<=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline92.43 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.547
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-3.01 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 10.62
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline85.72 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 16.137
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 44.55 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 10.93
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline86.53 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 18.705
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-6.93 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 14.428
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 42.77 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 13.407
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline94.76 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 17.262
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline87.96 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 15.928
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 41.22 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Deviation 8.054
p-value: 0.199195% CI: [-2.624, 12.313]MMRM
p-value: 0.298295% CI: [-11.263, 3.518]MMRM
p-value: 0.066495% CI: [-0.474, 14.025]MMRM
p-value: 0.414895% CI: [-4.344, 10.379]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of Treatment

RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.73 ratioStandard Deviation 0.136
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.00 ratioStandard Deviation 0.073
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.79 ratioStandard Deviation 0.141
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.063
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.82 ratioStandard Deviation 0.089
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.052
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.05 ratioStandard Deviation 0.112
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.77 ratioStandard Deviation 0.165
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline0.76 ratioStandard Deviation 0.148
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.05 ratioStandard Deviation 0.091
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of Treatment

RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.73 ratioStandard Deviation 0.136
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.143
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.79 ratioStandard Deviation 0.141
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.088
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.82 ratioStandard Deviation 0.089
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.04 ratioStandard Deviation 0.063
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.09
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.77 ratioStandard Deviation 0.165
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline0.76 ratioStandard Deviation 0.148
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 30.06 ratioStandard Deviation 0.08
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of Treatment

RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.73 ratioStandard Deviation 0.136
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.00 ratioStandard Deviation 0.117
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.79 ratioStandard Deviation 0.141
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.06
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.82 ratioStandard Deviation 0.089
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.05 ratioStandard Deviation 0.049
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.136
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.77 ratioStandard Deviation 0.165
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline0.76 ratioStandard Deviation 0.148
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 40.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.069
p-value: 0.463895% CI: [-0.034, 0.074]MMRM
p-value: 0.032295% CI: [0.005, 0.115]MMRM
p-value: 0.914495% CI: [-0.051, 0.056]MMRM
p-value: 0.036495% CI: [0.004, 0.11]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of Treatment

RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.73 ratioStandard Deviation 0.136
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.101
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.79 ratioStandard Deviation 0.141
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.08
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.82 ratioStandard Deviation 0.089
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.03 ratioStandard Deviation 0.067
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.096
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.77 ratioStandard Deviation 0.165
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline0.76 ratioStandard Deviation 0.148
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.07 ratioStandard Deviation 0.073
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of Treatment

aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline18.36 minutesStandard Deviation 4.62
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 20.25 minutesStandard Deviation 2.999
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline20.65 minutesStandard Deviation 3.638
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.88 minutesStandard Deviation 4.679
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline23.13 minutesStandard Deviation 5.919
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-2.52 minutesStandard Deviation 5.965
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.80 minutesStandard Deviation 2.961
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline19.84 minutesStandard Deviation 3.364
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline23.30 minutesStandard Deviation 10.862
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-3.95 minutesStandard Deviation 8.98
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of Treatment

aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline18.36 minutesStandard Deviation 4.62
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.14 minutesStandard Deviation 3.249
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline20.65 minutesStandard Deviation 3.638
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-1.17 minutesStandard Deviation 4.056
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline23.13 minutesStandard Deviation 5.919
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-3.80 minutesStandard Deviation 3.701
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.68 minutesStandard Deviation 2.292
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline19.84 minutesStandard Deviation 3.364
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline23.30 minutesStandard Deviation 10.862
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-4.15 minutesStandard Deviation 10.264
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of Treatment

aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline18.36 minutesStandard Deviation 4.62
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 41.00 minutesStandard Deviation 4.568
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1.31 minutesStandard Deviation 3.639
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline20.65 minutesStandard Deviation 3.638
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline23.13 minutesStandard Deviation 5.919
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-2.80 minutesStandard Deviation 5.727
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline19.84 minutesStandard Deviation 3.364
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.03 minutesStandard Deviation 2.307
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-5.30 minutesStandard Deviation 9.745
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline23.30 minutesStandard Deviation 10.862
p-value: 0.959995% CI: [-2.452, 2.579]MMRM
p-value: 0.854195% CI: [-2.817, 2.342]MMRM
p-value: 0.811795% CI: [-2.745, 2.16]MMRM
p-value: 0.227495% CI: [-4.113, 1]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of Treatment

aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline20.32 minutesStandard Deviation 6.625
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-0.32 minutesStandard Deviation 7.904
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline20.40 minutesStandard Deviation 5.14
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 21.79 minutesStandard Deviation 12.957
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline20.62 minutesStandard Deviation 5.898
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 24.71 minutesStandard Deviation 13.845
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 21.54 minutesStandard Deviation 6.333
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline21.89 minutesStandard Deviation 4.885
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline21.94 minutesStandard Deviation 7.79
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 22.57 minutesStandard Deviation 6.708
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of Treatment

aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline20.32 minutesStandard Deviation 6.625
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-2.88 minutesStandard Deviation 7.928
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline20.40 minutesStandard Deviation 5.14
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 33.67 minutesStandard Deviation 7.833
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline20.62 minutesStandard Deviation 5.898
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.52 minutesStandard Deviation 4.595
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-0.64 minutesStandard Deviation 5.482
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline21.89 minutesStandard Deviation 4.885
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline21.94 minutesStandard Deviation 7.79
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 32.76 minutesStandard Deviation 7.489
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of Treatment

aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline20.32 minutesStandard Deviation 6.625
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1.26 minutesStandard Deviation 8.621
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline20.40 minutesStandard Deviation 5.14
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-0.43 minutesStandard Deviation 8.053
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline20.62 minutesStandard Deviation 5.898
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 43.16 minutesStandard Deviation 8.14
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-2.03 minutesStandard Deviation 4.947
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline21.89 minutesStandard Deviation 4.885
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline21.94 minutesStandard Deviation 7.79
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 43.38 minutesStandard Deviation 12.354
p-value: 0.396695% CI: [-2.601, 6.465]MMRM
p-value: 0.138195% CI: [-1.125, 7.897]MMRM
p-value: 0.548795% CI: [-3.104, 5.778]MMRM
p-value: 0.058195% CI: [-0.153, 8.793]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of Treatment

M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline8560.4 activity countStandard Deviation 2631.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2232.7 activity countStandard Deviation 1829.1
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline11567.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4266.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-968.8 activity countStandard Deviation 2885.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline12158.1 activity countStandard Deviation 3639.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-121.1 activity countStandard Deviation 2137.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-564.2 activity countStandard Deviation 1975.7
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline10662.1 activity countStandard Deviation 5023.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentBaseline11460.5 activity countStandard Deviation 4954.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of TreatmentChange at Week 2-325.4 activity countStandard Deviation 1585.4
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of Treatment

M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline8560.4 activity countStandard Deviation 2631.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3300.3 activity countStandard Deviation 2094.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline11567.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4266.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-986.2 activity countStandard Deviation 3502
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline12158.1 activity countStandard Deviation 3639.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3572.6 activity countStandard Deviation 2216
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-828.3 activity countStandard Deviation 1970.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline10662.1 activity countStandard Deviation 5023.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentBaseline11460.5 activity countStandard Deviation 4954.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of TreatmentChange at Week 3-635.8 activity countStandard Deviation 2413.6
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of Treatment

M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline8560.4 activity countStandard Deviation 2631.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 41650.4 activity countStandard Deviation 1815.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline11567.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4266.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-1392.1 activity countStandard Deviation 2249.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline12158.1 activity countStandard Deviation 3639.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-477.4 activity countStandard Deviation 963.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4279.8 activity countStandard Deviation 2204
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline10662.1 activity countStandard Deviation 5023.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentBaseline11460.5 activity countStandard Deviation 4954.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of TreatmentChange at Week 4-457.8 activity countStandard Deviation 1788.7
p-value: 0.116295% CI: [-2878.587, 326.226]MMRM
p-value: 0.778195% CI: [-1382.85, 1837.777]MMRM
p-value: 0.425595% CI: [-2170.342, 929.179]MMRM
p-value: 0.467295% CI: [-2160.337, 1004.697]MMRM
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of Treatment

M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline8560.4 activity countStandard Deviation 2631.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 159.7 activity countStandard Deviation 1832.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline11567.0 activity countStandard Deviation 4266.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-731.4 activity countStandard Deviation 3373.5
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline12158.1 activity countStandard Deviation 3639.9
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 142.5 activity countStandard Deviation 1789.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-334.6 activity countStandard Deviation 2659.2
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline10662.1 activity countStandard Deviation 5023.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline11460.5 activity countStandard Deviation 4954.3
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-111.2 activity countStandard Deviation 2558
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of Treatment

aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline18.36 minutesStandard Deviation 4.62
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 12.15 minutesStandard Deviation 2.539
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline20.65 minutesStandard Deviation 3.638
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 10.09 minutesStandard Deviation 4.056
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline23.13 minutesStandard Deviation 5.919
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-1.12 minutesStandard Deviation 5.202
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.40 minutesStandard Deviation 3.394
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline19.84 minutesStandard Deviation 3.364
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline23.30 minutesStandard Deviation 10.862
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-3.19 minutesStandard Deviation 10.405
Primary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of Treatment

aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline20.32 minutesStandard Deviation 6.625
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-1.65 minutesStandard Deviation 5.078
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline20.40 minutesStandard Deviation 5.14
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-1.99 minutesStandard Deviation 2.825
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline20.62 minutesStandard Deviation 5.898
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.51 minutesStandard Deviation 6.522
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 1-0.82 minutesStandard Deviation 5.722
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline21.89 minutesStandard Deviation 4.885
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentBaseline21.94 minutesStandard Deviation 7.79
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of TreatmentChange at Week 11.54 minutesStandard Deviation 5.378
Other Pre-specified

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29

The NPI-10 assessed a wide range of behaviors seen in dementia for both frequency and severity. It is a 10 item questionnaire with the following domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/liability and aberrant motor behavior. The total score was summarized and analyzed. This scale was administered with the caregiver as proxy for the participant. The total score was a sum of the 10 domains, where the score of each domain was calculated as frequency (scale: 1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) \* Severity (scale: 1=Mild to 3=Severe). Each domain has a maximum score of 12 and all domains were equally weighted for total score, thus the range for the total score is 0 to 120 with 0 being completely healthy to 120 which is the worse score participant could get.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 29

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Baseline3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.13
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.64
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.23
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Baseline13.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.77
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Baseline7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.32
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.85
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Baseline6.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.27
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.95
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Change at Day 293.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.02
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29Baseline5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.73
Other Pre-specified

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29

The SDI is an expanded version of one item of the NPI. It described the frequency, severity, and caregiver burden of sleep-disturbed behaviors during a period prior to its administration. The SDI consists of the 7 sub questions relating to sleep from the NPI sleep disturbance item. Each of the sub questions is a separate question with frequency, severity, and caregiver distress rated by the caregiver with respect to the patient-participant for the 2 weeks prior to the visit. The SDI score is derived as the product of the average of the frequency ratings and the average of the severity ratings (range: 0-12 \[worst\]).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 29

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point were included for the assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Baseline0.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.692
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-0.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.078
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Baseline1.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.576
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-0.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.616
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Baseline0.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.653
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.503
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.574
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Baseline0.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.748
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Baseline1.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.708
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29Change at Day 29-0.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Other Pre-specified

Core Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29

The CGIC-ISWRD scale is a validated categorical measure of change in the participant's clinical condition between baseline and follow-up visits. It relies on both direct examination of the participant and an interview of the informant. The instrument consisted of 3 parts: a guided baseline interview administered to the participant and an informant, a follow-up interview administered to the participant and an informant, and a clinician's rating review. The baseline interview served as a reference for future ratings. During the baseline interview, the rater evaluated participant regarding domains of (1) sleep and wake symptoms; (2) mood and behavioral symptoms; (3) attention/arousal; and (4) social functioning. In the follow-up interview, a 7-pointscale was used, from 1 = marked improvement, 4 = no change, to 7 = marked worsening, to score each of the 4 domains and to provide a global score (1 \[marked improvement\] to 7 \[marked worsening\]).

Time frame: Day 29

Population: The FAS included group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Marked improvement1 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Marked worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Moderate worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal improvement4 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Moderate improvement1 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: No change6 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal worsening3 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: No change5 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Moderate improvement0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Marked improvement0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Moderate worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal improvement4 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Marked worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: No change4 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Marked improvement0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Moderate improvement2 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal improvement4 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal worsening2 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Moderate worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Marked worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal improvement5 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal worsening3 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Moderate improvement1 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Marked worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Moderate worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Marked improvement0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: No change3 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal improvement3 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Marked worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score : Moderate worsening0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Minimal worsening1 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Moderate improvement0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: Marked improvement0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgCore Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29Global score: No change7 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.

The SDI is an expanded version of one item of the NPI. It described the frequency, severity, and caregiver burden of sleep-disturbed behaviors during a period prior to its administration. The SDI consists of the 7 sub questions relating to sleep from the NPI sleep disturbance item. Each of the sub questions is a separate question with frequency, severity, and caregiver distress rated by the caregiver with respect to the patient-participant for the 2 weeks prior to the visit. The SDI score is derived as the product of the average of the frequency ratings and the average of the severity ratings (range: 0-12 \[worst\]).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 133, 223, 313, 343, 373, 403, 493, 583, 673, and 763

Population: The safety analysis set included the group of extension phase participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment in extension phase. Here overall number analyzed N are the participants who were evaluable for the outcome measure. Number analyzed n are the participants who were evaluable for the outcome measure for given categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Baseline1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.948
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 343 (Visit 16)0.60 score on a scale
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 133 (Visit 9)1.40 score on a scale
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 223 (Visit 12)-0.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.693
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 763 (Visit 22)-0.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.354
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Baseline0.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.728
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 133 (Visit 9)-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 313 (Visit 15)-0.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.574
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 343 (Visit 16)0.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.061
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 373 (Visit 17)-0.20 score on a scale
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 403 (Visit 18)-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.539
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 493 (Visit 19)-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.115
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 583 (Visit 20)-0.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.071
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 673 (Visit 21)-0.30 score on a scale
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 583 (Visit 20)-0.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.354
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 403 (Visit 18)-0.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.656
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 223 (Visit 12)0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.306
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Baseline1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.331
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 313 (Visit 15)-0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.266
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 133 (Visit 9)-0.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.473
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 493 (Visit 19)-0.10 score on a scale
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 343 (Visit 16)0.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.919
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.Change at Day 673 (Visit 21)-0.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.071
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Time frame: First dose of study drug (Day 1) to 14 days after last dose of study drug (approximately up to 2 years 7 months)

Population: The safety analysis set included the group of randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs4 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant-matched PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs3 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs3 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs4 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs6 Participants
Core Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Extension Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs4 Participants
Extension Phase: Lemborexant 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 Participants
Extension Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs2 Participants
Extension Phase: Lemborexant 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs10 Participants
Extension Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs5 Participants
Extension Phase: Lemborexant 15 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026