Skip to content

Barley Bread and Metabolic Disease

Whole Barley Bread: Effect on the Risk of Metabolic Disease and Other Health Effects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02867215
Acronym
Barleybread
Enrollment
14
Registered
2016-08-15
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to compare the metabolic effects of consuming whole barley bread and whole wheat bread, in healthy subjects. Also, to investigate the effect of whole grain flour on mineral status.

Detailed description

Generally, diet can be improved in order to lower diet-related diseases risk. However, the increasing prevalence rates of diet-related diseases indicate that, in practice, people's diet does not follow the recommendations. The intake of whole flour foods is consistently associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in epidemiological studies, although the mechanisms of this association are unclear. Here the aim is to compare the metabolic effects and mineral status of consumption of diet containing wholemeal barley bread versus whole meal wheat bread in healthy subjects. The intervention was designed as a randomized, cross over trial of 3-weeks duration. A total of 14 participants was included in the study. In one period subjects received WBB bread; in the second period, subjects received WWB bread. This bread is based on the recipe of Egyptian Baladi bread but formed in Danish buns form. Participants incorporated this bread into their normal habitual diet with regard to the study restrictions about other cereal food products. At the beginning and end of each intervention period blood was drawn and urine collected and stored for later analysis. The primary outcomes of this study are evaluation of LDL-c, insulin and glucose levels evaluated by analysis of fasting blood samples. Furthermore, selected measures to evaluate SCFA level in blood is to be evaluated. Secondary outcomes include mineral status.

Interventions

120g barley bread per day for 3 weeks.

120g wheat bread per day for 3 weeks.

Sponsors

University of Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 53 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Like and tolerate wheat/ barley bread products. * Age: 20 - 53 years * Body mass index (BMI): 23 - 30 kg/m2 * Weight stable (\<3 kg weight change during the last 6 months) * Apparently healthy * Informed consent signed * Freezer capacity for 1 week bread provision * Can attend all visits required for the study

Exclusion criteria

* Wheat/gluten or barley intolerance * Smoking on a daily basis * Lactating (or lactating within 6 weeks prior to study start), pregnant (or pregnant within 3 months prior to study start) or wish to become pregnant during the study * Diagnosed with any form of diabetes or cardiovascular disease * Reported chronic gastrointestinal disorders * Taking dietary supplements during or one month prior to the study * Lack of cooperation and adherence to the protocol * Use of prescription medication will be evaluated on an individual basis * Blood donation within 3 months prior to study start or during the study * Participation in other clinical trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LDL-c levels evaluated by analysis of fasting blood samples8-9 weeksEvaluated by analysis of fasting blood samples
Glucose levels evaluated by analysis of fasting blood samples8-9 weeksEvaluated by analysis of fasting blood samples
Insulin levels evaluated by analysis of fasting blood samples8-9 weeksEvaluated by analysis of fasting blood samples

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mineral status8-9 weeksEvaluation depends on the mineral. Either by Atom absorption, ICP-MS or spectrometry

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026